XFree86 4.1.0 and Gtk+

2001-08-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Looking at various bug reports, I find myself mighty confused. Checking XFree86 CVS, I have confirmed that the numeric reordering hack for core fonts did go into 4.1.0 (fontdir.c, 3.15 through 3.17, 3.17 is tagged all of xf-4_1_99_1, xf-4_1_0-bindist, xf-4_1_0, xf-4_1-branch, xf-4_0_99_902, xf-4_0

XFree86 4.1.0 and Gtk+

2001-08-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Looking at various bug reports, I find myself mighty confused. Checking XFree86 CVS, I have confirmed that the numeric reordering hack for core fonts did go into 4.1.0 (fontdir.c, 3.15 through 3.17, 3.17 is tagged all of xf-4_1_99_1, xf-4_1_0-bindist, xf-4_1_0, xf-4_1-branch, xf-4_0_99_902, xf-4_

TEST PLASE IGNORE

2001-08-27 Thread LordZe
TEST PLEASE IGNORE. LordZe--> Un Computer sicuro è un computer spento. -> Di Maria Antonio System Administrator -Credito Italiano- Italy(MI) UIN 123773221 /join #linux-mi (ircnet) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)

TEST PLASE IGNORE

2001-08-27 Thread LordZe
TEST PLEASE IGNORE. LordZe--> Un Computer sicuro è un computer spento. -> Di Maria Antonio System Administrator -Credito Italiano- Italy(MI) UIN 123773221 /join #linux-mi (ircnet) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) ---