On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:35:36AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I think there are three points of issue related it.
>
>
> 1) We will ship libGLU or not?
>
> Perhaps, YES.
> I agree your point, currenlty We can not disable libGLU
> cleanly (described one more problem on 2).
>
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines
>> Changed paths:
>>M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:35:36AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I think there are three points of issue related it.
>
>
> 1) We will ship libGLU or not?
>
> Perhaps, YES.
> I agree your point, currenlty We can not disable libGLU
> cleanly (described one more problem on 2).
>
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines
>> Changed paths:
>>M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-16
Severity: normal
Kernel version: 2.4.21-rc6-ac1
Libc version: 2.2.5-11.5
I have two different monitors that I'm trying to use in a dual-head
configuration, if only just to experiment with it. The I2C monitor info
detection isn't working on the second he
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:12:44PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I object to killing off the X-forked GLU package at this point for that
> > reason
> > and others.
>
> I'm looking forward to hearing them.
>
> Anyway, I agree that the commi
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:28:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:46:57PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:07:50AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > > Author: daniel
> > > Date: 2003-06-22 03:07:42 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
> > > New Rev
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:20:41PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:54:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I've merged Savage, fixed libGL's PICness, and it seems to build OK on
> > i386. I'm going to merge SiS and get a build run on all architectures
> > pos
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:23:08PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 03:17:08PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >We still need to have the debian bug 187374 fixed for
> > 4.3.0-0pre1v1.
>
> 1) It would be smart if you spoke to the whole team maintaining XFree86,
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-16
Severity: normal
Kernel version: 2.4.21-rc6-ac1
Libc version: 2.2.5-11.5
I have two different monitors that I'm trying to use in a dual-head
configuration, if only just to experiment with it. The I2C monitor info
detection isn't working on the second he
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines
> Changed paths:
>M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
>M /branches/4.3.0/sid/
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:17, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> I wish you'd both calm down a little bit about this issue.
>
> I have the impression that we're perfectly calm.
I feel that Branden's use of "calm" here is in the sense that the
changes have been c
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:17, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Mmm, I'm liking libgl1-xfree86. My original name for the DRM sources was
> > > xfree86-drm-src, but that later got renamed.
> >
> > Not too bad, methinks.
>
> I don't like i
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:12:44PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I object to killing off the X-forked GLU package at this point for that reason
> > and others.
>
> I'm looking forward to hearing them.
>
> Anyway, I agree that the commit in
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:11, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Why isn't Mesa 5's libGL built as well?
> >
> > *sigh* How many times will we have to walk this through yet?
> >
> > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:28:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:46:57PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:07:50AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > > Author: daniel
> > > Date: 2003-06-22 03:07:42 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
> > > New Rev
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:20:41PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:54:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I've merged Savage, fixed libGL's PICness, and it seems to build OK on
> > i386. I'm going to merge SiS and get a build run on all architectures
> > pos
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:54:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I'm going to merge SiS and get a build run on all architectures
> possible (i386 finished, powerpc is finishing); Branden, the Mesa stuff
> is in your court, as I can't really pick either way.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:04:08AM -0500,
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:23:08PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 03:17:08PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >We still need to have the debian bug 187374 fixed for
> > 4.3.0-0pre1v1.
>
> 1) It would be smart if you spoke to the whole team maintaining XFree86,
rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines
Changed paths:
M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIF
retitle 198344 xserver-xfree86: [nv] GeForce2 MX not supported in XFree86 4.1.0
tag 198344 + upstream
reassign 198344 xserver-xfree86
thanks
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 03:34:33PM -0700, mpbuss1 wrote:
> Package: xfree86-common
It looks like you're probably using version 4.1.0-16 of this package.
The
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 238
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.ia64
branches/4.3.0/sid/de
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:04:06PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Is the X Strike Force repository on necrotic.deadbeast.net set
> up to allow anonymous checkouts of the debian directories with svn?
No.
> ps The web view of the repository at
>
> http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cg
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 15:23, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> >
> > + * stop building libGLU: that can be taken care of by libglu1-mesa, or
> > +whatever implementation people feel like using.
> > +
> > + * completely new na
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:04:08AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Log:
> This is a biggie:
> * Trash xlibmesa-glu.* (use libglu1-mesa).
> * Rename xlibmesa-gl* to libgl1-xfree86*.
> * Rename xlibmesa-dri to libgl1-xfree86-dri.
> * Rename xlibmesa-drm-src to xfree86-drm-src.
Why d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 198344 xserver-xfree86: [nv] GeForce2 MX not supported in XFree86
> 4.1.0
Bug#198344: Package: xfree86-common
Changed Bug title.
> tag 198344 + upstream
Bug#198344: xserver-xfree86: [nv] GeForce2 MX not supported in XFree86 4.1.0
There were no
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:46:57PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:07:50AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > Author: daniel
> > Date: 2003-06-22 03:07:42 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
> > New Revision: 228
> >
> > Added:
> >branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/061_sava
retitle 198386 xserver-xfree86: [s3] driver slows down system clock
tag 198386 + moreinfo
thanks
If you'd mail the bug address with your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 and
/var/log/XFree86.0.log files, it would be most helpful.
--
G. Branden Robinson| When dogma enters the brain, all
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:54:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've merged Savage, fixed libGL's PICness, and it seems to build OK on
> i386. I'm going to merge SiS and get a build run on all architectures
> possible (i386 finished, powerpc is finishing); Branden, the Mesa stuff
> is in
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:38:44AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Jerome Lacoste [Fri, Jun 20 2003, 07:49:55PM]:
>
> > I solved my problem by downgrading from XFree 4.3 to XFree 4.2.1 as
> > packaged by blade
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~blade/woody/i386/
>
> It was not packaged
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Mmm, I'm liking libgl1-xfree86. My original name for the DRM sources was
> > xfree86-drm-src, but that later got renamed.
>
> Not too bad, methinks.
I don't like it. Are these things really XFree86 X xserver specific, or
just DRI
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 10:48:40AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> The current debian/README claims that this is an early prototypical version
> of
> the dbs in use in the packaging of X. I was wondering if it would be useful
> for me to look into updating X to use the dbs that is current.
Yes, p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 198386 xserver-xfree86: [s3] driver slows down system clock
Bug#198386: Starting new X (4.2.1) on old S3 card slows down system clock.
Changed Bug title.
> tag 198386 + moreinfo
Bug#198386: xserver-xfree86: [s3] driver slows down system clock
T
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 03:17:08PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Daniel,
>We still need to have the debian bug 187374 fixed for
> 4.3.0-0pre1v1.
1) It would be smart if you spoke to the whole team maintaining XFree86,
not just Daniel Stone.
2) No, we don't "need" that weak symbols bug fixed.
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines
> Changed paths:
>M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
>M /branches/4.3.0/sid/
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Why isn't Mesa 5's libGL built as well?
>
> *sigh* How many times will we have to walk this through yet?
>
> The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular,
> the former can't use direct rendering, while th
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:17, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> I wish you'd both calm down a little bit about this issue.
>
> I have the impression that we're perfectly calm.
I feel that Branden's use of "calm" here is in the sense that the
changes have been c
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:17, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Mmm, I'm liking libgl1-xfree86. My original name for the DRM sources was
> > > xfree86-drm-src, but that later got renamed.
> >
> > Not too bad, methinks.
>
> I don't like i
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:11, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Why isn't Mesa 5's libGL built as well?
> >
> > *sigh* How many times will we have to walk this through yet?
> >
> > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:54:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I'm going to merge SiS and get a build run on all architectures
> possible (i386 finished, powerpc is finishing); Branden, the Mesa stuff
> is in your court, as I can't really pick either way.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:04:08AM -0500,
rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines
Changed paths:
M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIF
retitle 198344 xserver-xfree86: [nv] GeForce2 MX not supported in XFree86 4.1.0
tag 198344 + upstream
reassign 198344 xserver-xfree86
thanks
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 03:34:33PM -0700, mpbuss1 wrote:
> Package: xfree86-common
It looks like you're probably using version 4.1.0-16 of this package.
The
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-22 11:37:38 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 237
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.diff
Log:
revert latest change of #063 patch, and add Note about libGLU.
libGLU weak dependency problem should be fixed even if Debian
will not sh
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 238
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.ia64
branches/4.3.0/sid/de
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 15:23, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> >
> > + * stop building libGLU: that can be taken care of by libglu1-mesa, or
> > +whatever implementation people feel like using.
> > +
> > + * completely new na
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:04:06PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Is the X Strike Force repository on necrotic.deadbeast.net set
> up to allow anonymous checkouts of the debian directories with svn?
No.
> ps The web view of the repository at
>
> http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cg
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:04:08AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Log:
> This is a biggie:
> * Trash xlibmesa-glu.* (use libglu1-mesa).
> * Rename xlibmesa-gl* to libgl1-xfree86*.
> * Rename xlibmesa-dri to libgl1-xfree86-dri.
> * Rename xlibmesa-drm-src to xfree86-drm-src.
Why d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 198344 xserver-xfree86: [nv] GeForce2 MX not supported in XFree86 4.1.0
Bug#198344: Package: xfree86-common
Changed Bug title.
> tag 198344 + upstream
Bug#198344: xserver-xfree86: [nv] GeForce2 MX not supported in XFree86 4.1.0
There were no ta
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:46:57PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:07:50AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > Author: daniel
> > Date: 2003-06-22 03:07:42 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
> > New Revision: 228
> >
> > Added:
> >branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/061_sava
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:54:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've merged Savage, fixed libGL's PICness, and it seems to build OK on
> i386. I'm going to merge SiS and get a build run on all architectures
> possible (i386 finished, powerpc is finishing); Branden, the Mesa stuff
> is in
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: daniel
>> Date: 2003-06-22 08:22:53 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
>> New Revision: 236
>> Modified:
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.di
retitle 198386 xserver-xfree86: [s3] driver slows down system clock
tag 198386 + moreinfo
thanks
If you'd mail the bug address with your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 and
/var/log/XFree86.0.log files, it would be most helpful.
--
G. Branden Robinson| When dogma enters the brain, all
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Mmm, I'm liking libgl1-xfree86. My original name for the DRM sources was
> > xfree86-drm-src, but that later got renamed.
>
> Not too bad, methinks.
I don't like it. Are these things really XFree86 X xserver specific, or
just DRI
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 10:48:40AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> The current debian/README claims that this is an early prototypical version of
> the dbs in use in the packaging of X. I was wondering if it would be useful
> for me to look into updating X to use the dbs that is current.
Yes, plea
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:38:44AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Jerome Lacoste [Fri, Jun 20 2003, 07:49:55PM]:
>
> > I solved my problem by downgrading from XFree 4.3 to XFree 4.2.1 as
> > packaged by blade
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~blade/woody/i386/
>
> It was not packaged
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 198386 xserver-xfree86: [s3] driver slows down system clock
Bug#198386: Starting new X (4.2.1) on old S3 card slows down system clock.
Changed Bug title.
> tag 198386 + moreinfo
Bug#198386: xserver-xfree86: [s3] driver slows down system clock
T
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 03:17:08PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Daniel,
>We still need to have the debian bug 187374 fixed for
> 4.3.0-0pre1v1.
1) It would be smart if you spoke to the whole team maintaining XFree86,
not just Daniel Stone.
2) No, we don't "need" that weak symbols bug fixed.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Why isn't Mesa 5's libGL built as well?
>
> *sigh* How many times will we have to walk this through yet?
>
> The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular,
> the former can't use direct rendering, while th
Is the X Strike Force repository on necrotic.deadbeast.net set
up to allow anonymous checkouts of the debian directories with svn?
If so what is the correct syntax for that? Thanks in advance.
Jack
ps The web view of the repository at
http://necrotic.deadbeast.
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-22 11:37:38 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 237
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.diff
Log:
revert latest change of #063 patch, and add Note about libGLU.
libGLU weak dependency problem should be fixed even if Debian
will not sh
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: daniel
>> Date: 2003-06-22 08:22:53 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
>> New Revision: 236
>> Modified:
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.di
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 15:23, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>
> + * stop building libGLU: that can be taken care of by libglu1-mesa, or
> +whatever implementation people feel like using.
> +
> + * completely new naming scheme for the libGL packages: libgl1-xfree86,
> +libgl1-xfree86-d
Is the X Strike Force repository on necrotic.deadbeast.net set
up to allow anonymous checkouts of the debian directories with svn?
If so what is the correct syntax for that? Thanks in advance.
Jack
ps The web view of the repository at
http://necrotic.deadbeast.
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 08:18:24 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 235
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.ia64
branches/4.3.0/sid/debi
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 08:02:30 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 234
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl-xfree86-dev.install
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl-xfree86-dev.links
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl1-xfree86-dbg.install
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl1-xfree86
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 08:22:53 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 236
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.diff
Log:
patch #063: get rid of the remenants of the GLU stuff; update changelog
Modified: branches/4.3.0/s
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 07:44:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 233
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/061_savage_driver_1.1.27t.diff
Log:
patch #061 (Savage): clean up the diff - I did this locally, must've forgotten
to commit.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/pat
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:40:12PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> New savage driver fails to build...
>
> vbe.h is placed in (XF86SRC)/vbe, but Imakefile refers
> $(XF86OSSRC)/vbe. This change of #063 patch is not needed.
>
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> -I$(XF86SRC)/ddc -I$(XF86SRC)/i2c \
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 07:35:50 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 232
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.diff
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian
New savage driver fails to build...
vbe.h is placed in (XF86SRC)/vbe, but Imakefile refers
$(XF86OSSRC)/vbe. This change of #063 patch is not needed.
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
-I$(XF86SRC)/ddc -I$(XF86SRC)/i2c \
-I$(XF86SRC)/rac -I$(XF86SRC)/int10 -I$(SERVERSRC)/render \
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
>> > I believe they are generic bugs on Linux based system.
>> >
>> > So, It is
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 15:23, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>
> + * stop building libGLU: that can be taken care of by libglu1-mesa, or
> +whatever implementation people feel like using.
> +
> + * completely new naming scheme for the libGL packages: libgl1-xfree86,
> +libgl1-xfree86-d
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 14:04, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and f
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 14:04, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and friends?
> >
> > No, as has been discussed here, it's still mesag3 for
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
> I believe they are generic bugs on Linux based system.
>
> So, It is better to put them into xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl.
>
> --- xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl.orig 2
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and friends?
>
> No, as has been discussed here, it's still mesag3 for hysterical
> reasons. We have to set a good example. :)
"
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > > Any ideas on what we should call xlibmesa-drm-src and xlibmesa-gl?
> >
> > Time for a little brainstorming session? :)
> >
After adding the line
deb http://www.penguinppc.org/~daniels/sid/i386/ ./
to /etc/apt/sources.list, I tried the XFree 4.3.0-prerelease
Version: 4.3.0-0ds4
But that does not help, either.
Regards,
Andreas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Schlüssel 0xA207E340 (http://www.pca.dfn.de/dfnpca/pgpkse
Daniel Stone wrote:
49234 000_stolen_from_HEAD_sis_driver.diff
That's ... um ... kinda big.
Yes, it is. This implements
- MergedFB mode with Xv and HWCursor
- and a *lot* of tweaks for customized hardware.
SiS never makes the cards, but only the chips. And there is about a
million ways
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 08:02:30 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 234
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl-xfree86-dev.install
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl-xfree86-dev.links
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl1-xfree86-dbg.install
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/libgl1-xfree86
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 08:22:53 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 236
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.diff
Log:
patch #063: get rid of the remenants of the GLU stuff; update changelog
Modified: branches/4.3.0/s
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: daniel
>> Date: 2003-06-22 03:28:31 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
>> New Revision: 231
>> + * fix weak deps (libGLU->libGL, many on X11/Xext in xlibs):
>> +- patch #003: updated - set SharedFooReq
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > >
> > > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular,
> > > the former can't use direct
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular,
> > the former can't use direct rendering, while the latter can't use plain
> > X11 rendering.
> >
> >
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 04:15, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 04:13:58AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 03:55, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 06:09:35PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > * drop xlibmesa-glu* in favour of libglu1-mesa*
>
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 07:44:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 233
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/061_savage_driver_1.1.27t.diff
Log:
patch #061 (Savage): clean up the diff - I did this locally, must've forgotten
to commit.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/pat
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:40:12PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> New savage driver fails to build...
>
> vbe.h is placed in (XF86SRC)/vbe, but Imakefile refers
> $(XF86OSSRC)/vbe. This change of #063 patch is not needed.
>
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> -I$(XF86SRC)/ddc -I$(XF86SRC)/i2c \
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-22 07:35:50 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 232
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_fix_weak_deps.diff
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian
New savage driver fails to build...
vbe.h is placed in (XF86SRC)/vbe, but Imakefile refers
$(XF86OSSRC)/vbe. This change of #063 patch is not needed.
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
-I$(XF86SRC)/ddc -I$(XF86SRC)/i2c \
-I$(XF86SRC)/rac -I$(XF86SRC)/int10 -I$(SERVERSRC)/render \
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
>> > I believe they are generic bugs on Linux based system.
>> >
>> > So, It is
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 14:04, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and f
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 14:04, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and friends?
> >
> > No, as has been discussed here, it's still mesag3 for
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
> I believe they are generic bugs on Linux based system.
>
> So, It is better to put them into xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl.
>
> --- xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl.orig 2
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and friends?
>
> No, as has been discussed here, it's still mesag3 for hysterical
> reasons. We have to set a good example. :)
"
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > > Any ideas on what we should call xlibmesa-drm-src and xlibmesa-gl?
> >
> > Time for a little brainstorming session? :)
> >
After adding the line
deb http://www.penguinppc.org/~daniels/sid/i386/ ./
to /etc/apt/sources.list, I tried the XFree 4.3.0-prerelease
Version: 4.3.0-0ds4
But that does not help, either.
Regards,
Andreas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Schlüssel 0xA207E340 (http://www.pca.dfn.de/dfnpca/pgpkse
Daniel Stone wrote:
49234 000_stolen_from_HEAD_sis_driver.diff
That's ... um ... kinda big.
Yes, it is. This implements
- MergedFB mode with Xv and HWCursor
- and a *lot* of tweaks for customized hardware.
SiS never makes the cards, but only the chips. And there is about a
million ways to co
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: daniel
>> Date: 2003-06-22 03:28:31 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003)
>> New Revision: 231
>> + * fix weak deps (libGLU->libGL, many on X11/Xext in xlibs):
>> +- patch #003: updated - set SharedFooReq
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > >
> > > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular,
> > > the former can't use direct
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular,
> > the former can't use direct rendering, while the latter can't use plain
> > X11 rendering.
> >
> >
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
