X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r546 - branches/6.9/debian/patches/general

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-08-21 23:48:09 -0500 (Sun, 21 Aug 2005) New Revision: 546 Modified: branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/025b_xkb_README_typos.diff Log: Un-fuzzy to pass patch-audit Modified: branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/025b_xkb_README_typos.diff

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r545 - in branches/6.9/debian: . patches patches/general

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-08-21 23:41:16 -0500 (Sun, 21 Aug 2005) New Revision: 545 Removed: branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/000_stolen_from_HEAD_Xfuncproto.diff branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i810.diff branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/000_stolen_from_HE

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r544 - in branches/6.9/debian: . patches patches/general po scripts

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-08-21 23:06:50 -0500 (Sun, 21 Aug 2005) New Revision: 544 Added: branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/000_stolen_from_HEAD_Xfuncproto.diff branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/000_stolen_from_HEAD_savage.diff branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/025f_XPutImage_man

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r543 - branches/6.9/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-08-21 22:49:53 -0500 (Sun, 21 Aug 2005) New Revision: 543 Modified: branches/6.9/debian/changelog branches/6.9/debian/control Log: - xserver-xorg-dbg now conflicts, replaces, and provides xserver-xorg Modified: branches/6.9/debian/changelog =

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r542 - in branches/6.9/debian: . scripts

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-08-21 22:48:04 -0500 (Sun, 21 Aug 2005) New Revision: 542 Modified: branches/6.9/debian/scripts/mir-false-negatives branches/6.9/debian/xbase-clients.install branches/6.9/debian/xdm.install branches/6.9/debian/xlibmesa-dri-dbg.install.i386 branches/6.9/de

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r541 - branches/6.9/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-08-21 22:19:02 -0500 (Sun, 21 Aug 2005) New Revision: 541 Modified: branches/6.9/debian/changelog Log: Use proper terminology Modified: branches/6.9/debian/changelog === --- branches/6.9/debian/changelo

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r539 - in branches/6.9/debian: . patches/general

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 06:06:27PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:56 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > wrote: > > > > +/* Some day, but not yet ... */ > > -+# define MakeDllModules NO > > ++# define MakeDllModules YES > > Some day, but not y

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r539 - in branches/6.9/debian: . patches/general

On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:56 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > > +/* Some day, but not yet ... */ > -+# define MakeDllModulesNO > ++# define MakeDllModulesYES Some day, but not yet... YES? ;) What's the rationale behind setting this explicitly instead

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r539 - in branches/6.9/debian: . patches/general

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-08-21 14:56:16 -0500 (Sun, 21 Aug 2005) New Revision: 539 Modified: branches/6.9/debian/MANIFEST.all branches/6.9/debian/MANIFEST.i386.in branches/6.9/debian/changelog branches/6.9/debian/patches/general/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff Log: - Modify general

Processed: Re: Bug#256376: clone

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 324352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#324352: Please include a bugscript allowing xterm to report its version Changed Bug submitter from Wilfried Goesgens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 324352 Please include the output of xterm -v

Processed: Re: Bug#256376: clone

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 324001 -1 Bug#324001: xterm: top in a super-small xterm crashes them both Bug 324001 cloned as bug 324352. > retitle -1 Please include a bugscript allowing xterm to report its version Bug#324352: xterm: top in a super-small xterm crashes them bot

Bug#324352: Bug#256376: clone

submitter 324352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 324352 Please include the output of xterm -v in bugreports thanks On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:00:42PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > "xterm -v" gives the information > (and it doesn't try to open the display ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#324001: Bug#256376: clone

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:45:37PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > hmm - aside from the cosmetic issue you reported with libXt (an overlapping > > memcpy is just that), what other warnings are you seeing with valgrind? > Right; its cosmetic because the obvious implementation of memcpy is: > >

Bug#322920: Error in postrm: remove_conffile_rollback() declared twice

remove_conffile_rollback() is declared twice and the second "syntax"-comment is wrong: remove_conffile_rollback () { # syntax: remove_conffile_rollback filename ... remove_conffile_rollback () { # syntax: replace_conffile_with_symlink_rollback oldfilename newfilename Cheers, Andreas --

Bug#324275: libxaw8-dev should depend on libxp-dev

Package: libxaw8-dev Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 imake expands LOCAL_LIBRARIES = XawClientLibs into -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXp -lXext -lX11 making libxp-dev necessary for building Xaw applications. (The other development packages are a

Bug#324251: I cannot start the x server

Package: XFree86 Version: 4.3.0.1   Hi.       I'm trying to install the debian in my PC But the there is a message apear: "I cannot start the x server it is likely that it is not setup correctly would you like to view the x server output to diagnose the problem"       I ran the command XFree8

update-alternatives and window-manager and display-manager

[I have stable installed] I noticed some little issues concernig update-alternatives 1) I think that the display mangaer should be choosen using update-alternatives --confi x-display-manager (btw: how is it made now?) 2) I have gnome installed, but in update-alternatives --config x-window-manage