Bug#670867: Still testing stuff for this bug

2012-06-14 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I did some more tests, today with current xserver and video drivers from testing and kernel 3.4 from experimental, still same old results, so I thought I'd give a try to the new xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.19.0-2 from unstable and the new aceleration, ... well, I didn't had the chance, as

Bug#670867: More tests

2012-05-07 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I thought I could test with lower bpp depths so that less memory was needed (I seem to recall that at lower depth I could run without needing to specify the memory parameter on previous versions of xorg) but the results were exactly the same. I even tested 800x600 @ 16 bpp with same blue video

Bug#670867: xv video rendering doesn't work on i830M

2012-04-30 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Did [ 199.905] (EE) intel(0): Detected a hung GPU, disabling acceleration. [ 199.905] (EE) intel(0): When reporting this, please include i915_error_state from debugfs and the full dmesg. and [ 199.864077] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU

Bug#670867: xv video rendering doesn't work on i830M

2012-04-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.18.0-2 Severity: normal Playing back video on a i830M card shows a blue video the first time and X11 error: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation) the next times you try it. This is when using XV, if you try to render with X11 there is no

Bug#477559: Still fails with current Lenny packages

2011-03-02 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I have just updated the machine to current Lenny and it still fails in the very same way as it used to. is it going any better with squeeze or higher? Nope, it is still failing at squeeze, I'm using the fb driver right now because of this. Do you want me to test upgrading to sid? any

Bug#571741: Kernel patch fixes this bug.

2010-07-07 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
reassign 571741 linux-source-2.6.32 stop Hi! As far as I can tell it seems that the kernel upstream patch I was reporting about resolves this bug. I have tested the patch on our 2.6.32 for several days without any problem. I'm reasigning the bug to the kernel package as the problem is within

Bug#571741: Upstream is sugesting a kernel patch to fix this

2010-07-04 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! Upstream is sugesting that a Linus kernel patch is fixing this, I'm going to try to test this on Debian's 2.6.32 kernel and report back, if anybody else is willing to test, this is the commit:

Bug#571741: Submitted upstream

2010-03-01 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I have just submitted it upstream, you can follow it here: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26825 Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#571741: tested with 2.6.32-3

2010-02-28 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Ok, I have started testing this new 2.6.32 and did a little bit better but I think this was only luck, nothing else. I could log on and saw this on dmesg: [ 396.756554] Restarting tasks ... [ 396.757030] klogd[1194]: segfault at cc9cd400 ip 7fe87ebb3c02 sp 7fffcc9ccf40 error 6 in

Bug#571741: explaining hardware

2010-02-28 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Like I said on the report the machine was going well on the -1 version of the intel driver, it was only then I upgraded to -2 that it started failing, furthermore, if I disable kms the machine is fine again. Machine is completely stable, there can be no poblem with any hardware, machine is

Bug#571741: DRI makes no difference

2010-02-28 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I just tried with the nodri line (checked it and DRI was effectively disabled) using 2.6.33-2 and same weird behaviour happened, at the xscreensaver I wasn't able to authenticate after the pm-hibernate and when I went to a tty it was not able to spawn a login and got some error about an assertion

Bug#571741: Another one

2010-02-28 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
This time I was testing with 2.6.33 after upgrading libdrm, mesa, ... as Cyril Brulebois suggests on his Where have you been post at planet. After first pm-hibernate everything seemed fine, but after the second one I saw this: [ 1083.562662] PM: restore of devices complete after 1476.094 msecs [

Bug#571741: same happens on linux-image-2.6.33-2-amd64 2.6.33-1~experimental.1

2010-02-27 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I have just tried that new kernel and the behaviour was the same. I could not log into the machine, not on ssh or the console. Let me explain what I was seing... the screen was locked with xscreensaver and it didn't recognice my password, so I switched to a VT and tried to log on there, but the

Bug#559233: More doc

2010-01-30 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I see there are a lot of solutions for this, I'd like to explain how I did it and sugest that some comments of the ways to fix this and examples are added in a README.Debian or examples dir or similar. All I did was add this two sections to my xorg.conf: Section InputDevice Identifier

Bug#477559: Still fails with current Lenny packages

2008-10-04 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I have just updated the machine to current Lenny and it still fails in the very same way as it used to. I think I didn't mention that a normal kill doesn't kill the server and you need a kill -9 to kill it and it doesn't restore the text mode after that, the same totted X screen remains and

Bug#481050: After coming from DPMS I get a black screen with working mouse pointer

2008-05-13 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.3.1-1 Severity: important I sent this bug already for version 2:2.2.0-1 but we had it closed as it seemed that the bug was gone, maybe some of the cases on which it was happening are now fixed, but it still happens on current versions of the driver.

Bug#463633: After coming from DPMS I get a black screen with working mouse pointer

2008-02-12 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Ping? Please try with 2:2.2.0.90-2 which has been uploaded today. Sorry, I could not reply before, this seems to fix the problem at least for my system. The only weird thing I saw was that the server is coming up with a resolution bigger than the one on the laptop's screen, I solved this by

Bug#463633: After coming from DPMS I get a black screen with working mouse pointer

2008-02-01 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.2.0-1 Severity: important The server works ok, but if I let it go into DPMS mode, when coming back I get a black screen, only the mouse pointer is shown then, I can move it and it is perfectly drawn, but the whole screen remains black. I can get the

Bug#455786: can't see video with swfdec on xserver-xorg but works on Xephyr

2007-12-12 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Can you try xserver-xorg-video-ati 6.7.196-2 currently in experimental? I have tried it without any improvement, still no video if we use XAA. Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#455786: can't see video with swfdec on xserver-xorg but works on Xephyr

2007-12-12 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
It seems to work for me using the latest intel driver (thus using EXA). Andreas Henriksson said he could reproduce this when using XAA, but not using EXA (with the radeon driver), so I'm retitling it accordingly (and tagging wontfix, because nobody seems interested in fixing XAA these days).

Bug#455786: can't see video with swfdec on xserver-xorg but works on Xephyr

2007-12-11 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.3+7 Severity: important The problem seems to be related to painting an image with cairo and maybe scaling. For example, trying to see a youtube video fails, also some swf files on which there is a bitmap mixed with some vector graphics, are seen ok on standard

Bug#455786: can't see video with swfdec on xserver-xorg but works on Xephyr

2007-12-11 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
What did you upgrade when the breakage appeared? the whole Xorg from testing to unstable? or did you just update your unstable? I hadn't realised of the problem as my amd64 was having it all the time as it is my develpment machine and runs unstable since I installed it not too long ago. What I

Bug#240581: Did you forget about this patch?

2004-04-30 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I thought this patch would be applied on the new upload, but it seems it wasn't, I have reworked it again so that it applies well against the new packages and I'm sending it again to see if we have better luck next time ;-) Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net diff -r -u

Bug#240581: Patch to add option for ATI Radeon to force the use of lower dotclocks

2004-03-27 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: xfree86 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi! I have found that my Radeon card as well as many others, says that it can work from 20Mhz to 400Mhz, this would mean that it is not capable of producing TV frequencies, which it is, I have found that this problem had been reported on xfree86

Re: i830 VT switch broken in 4.3.0-0pre1v5

2004-01-21 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
If so I think I should probably build and test 4.3.0-0pre1v5 with 056_i810_make_i830_usable.diff instead of 000_stolen_from_HEAD_i830_driver.diff, what do you think? Sounds like a good plan. Please let us know how this turns out. Well, sorry for not reporting before, I have had trouble

Re: i830 VT switch broken in 4.3.0-0pre1v5

2004-01-12 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
You should probably let David Dawes know that the fixes that were committed to xf-4_3-branch made things worse, not better. I was going to ask him about that, but I realised that asside the changes in the 000_post430.diff patch, which I suppose are the changes on the 4.3 branch, there is also

i830 VT switch broken in 4.3.0-0pre1v5

2004-01-04 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I was happily using 4.3.0-0pre1v4 on my i830 based laptop and when I upgraded to 4.3.0-0pre1v5 VT switching broke. It is the typical effect descrived by David Dawes in his pages, this is: going from X to the text mode vts will make me loose the screen, which then, when going back to X will

Bug#178600: xfree86: Support for the S3Trio64V2

2003-01-27 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
--- s3trio64v2.diff Patch to add dummy support for the S3 Trio64V2 DX or GX By Santiago Garcia Mantinan and Javier Moran Rua --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/s3/s3_driver.c.orig Fri Jan 24 14:40:44 2003 +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/s3

Bug#178600: xfree86: Support for the S3Trio64V2

2003-01-27 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Why do you call it a dummy patch? It looks to me like it actually does something. Yes, well the thing is that the patch is only a couple of defines and an if sentence. It works by allowing the 64V2 work like the other trios and setting the maximun clocks allowed (set using the values we've

Bug#178600: xfree86: Support for the S3Trio64V2

2003-01-27 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
] --- s3trio64v2.diff Patch to add dummy support for the S3 Trio64V2 DX or GX By Santiago Garcia Mantinan and Javier Moran Rua --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/s3/s3_driver.c.orig Fri Jan 24 14:40:44 2003 +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/s3

Bug#178600: xfree86: Support for the S3Trio64V2

2003-01-27 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Why do you call it a dummy patch? It looks to me like it actually does something. Yes, well the thing is that the patch is only a couple of defines and an if sentence. It works by allowing the 64V2 work like the other trios and setting the maximun clocks allowed (set using the values we've

Bug#137752: dirty patch

2002-11-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: xfree86v3 Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-29 Followup-For: Bug #137752 This is a dirty patch that enables xfree86v3 to build on powerpc, the first part is to correct one of the patches to make it put the configuration for xfree68 on the correct place, this was done on xfree86 but