New branch 'multiarch' available with the following commits:
commit 2c097c7d235ddaecaf1a5d00570cd622c836674e
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Tue Mar 22 02:13:41 2011 -0700
build for multiarch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
New branch 'multiarch' available with the following commits:
commit aededa16e1b23a2f0a40c123f9c63549ab0e83e0
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Tue Mar 22 01:47:50 2011 -0700
build for multiarch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
debian/control |4 +++-
debian/libx11-6-udeb.install |2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit bbadca777d5dd10d5f638c61662f6bd1e8c7d6ef
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Mon Mar 21 23:35:44 2011 -0700
install udeb contents to /usr/lib
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/libdrm-dev.links|5 -
debian/libdrm-dev.links.in |5 +
debian/rules |5 +++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d67ab9b5773c590cbb877c7404a3ba94e1335ae9
Author: Steve
debian/control |9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit a3853a0540b739370fbeb6f252df15b3c4ec629a
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Sat Mar 19 20:55:26 2011 -0700
the rest of these packages are also multiarch clean; mark them as such
diff --git a/debian/control b
|1 +
debian/rules | 11 +++
14 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d21b4bac7d3d2fa0c1346665325d2b58919d5dca
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Sat Mar 19 20:53:09 2011 -0700
releasing version 2.4.23-1ubuntu4
diff --git a
New branch 'multiarch' available with the following commits:
commit bb14fd7d6ba25d989527cc1fd5a61a76aca417eb
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Sat Mar 19 20:24:41 2011 -0700
Build for multiarch
Install the libraries in the multiarch paths as described at
<http://wi
Package: xutils-dev
Version: 1:7.6+1
Severity: normal
The xutils-dev package recently had a Build-Depends: xutils-dev added with
the explanation:
* Add build-dep on xutils-dev for lndir.
I haven't been able to figure out why this is, as nothing in the build
system appears to invoke lndir. Hop
New branch 'debian-multiarch' available with the following commits:
commit 8a3ac024dc9bd0fc3d3500974551b9234ed8ab3a
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Mon Feb 21 20:37:32 2011 -0800
Build for multiarch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 7505c7ae86d1b1ad09d7b8e80243dfd78f092252
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Mon Feb 21 20:01:41 2011 -0800
releasing version 2:1.4.1-5
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/control |1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 5a40ed4761657276f42f41c94b311d002590f711
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Mon Feb 21 19:41:13 2011 -0800
releasing version 1:7.6~3ubuntu7
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/control |1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 052474bf1f7a0d74d820e44aa7ab3f2b66bd1c9a
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Mon Feb 21 19:29:56 2011 -0800
Mark x11-common as Multi-Arch: foreign, so foreign-architecture libs have
ages
> currently.
> Now, do others want to keep on being listed as uploaders?
As I recall, David added me to XSF to try to make me feel responsible for
the state of the packages. I don't think this worked. :) I'm fine to have
my name dropped from the uploaders fields.
Thanks,
-
debian/changelog|7 +++
debian/patches/100_bgnoneroot.patch | 18 +-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 64b3d4c93dc03ab1b492fe773f390fcef43c650c
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Tue Feb 1 19:25:06 2011 -0800
Rebased ref, commits from common ancestor:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pkjxq-0008eb...@alioth.debian.org
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 1a58351c690421d5d1771de544ca49f227bb6ed8
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Tue Feb 1 09:12:13 2011 -0800
releasing version 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu6
diff --git a/debian
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi Steve.
Hey KiBi,
>Steve McIntyre (13/09/2010):
>> I'm seeing intermittent crashes from the X server on my Lenovo
>> Thinkpad X200 machine.
>
>Hmm, X log doesn't say much; maybe running X insid
I can do to help debug, please let me know.
Cheers,
Steve
-- Package-specific info:
/var/lib/x11/X.roster does not exist.
/var/lib/x11/X.md5sum does not exist.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Sep 10 01:34 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1878432 Aug 24
ion of what steps we recommend users take when
in this situation in order to configure their xorg.conf correctly, and for
this we need the input of the X maintainers. Cc:ing debian-x for this.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
8bac5db6f3ce382f1ed5cfb80003ddefa1c71043
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Fri Mar 12 11:36:50 2010 -0800
Since we have xedit again, drop the conffile removal handling from the
maintainer scripts. LP: #518045.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index dde49c4..47d661a 100644
--- a/debian
deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 2e0f887d89eee6add4ae62b8947b2011ae27778e
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: Thu Feb 18 08:18:48 2010 +
Move runtime libraries to /lib (needed by plymouth)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 8a0f5eb..3de0386 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:04:15AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
> > Version: 1:6.12.4-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Just upgraded all packages today and rebooted into my first attempt at
> > u
rver -- VESA display driver
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in 2.6.31-rc8 is much more stable
than EXA has been in the recent past.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.d
Package: xorg-docs
Version: 1:1.4-5
Severity: normal
xorg-docs-core suggests xorg-docs
But there's no dependency in the opposition direction; I'd expect a
recommends or depends.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture:
symbol table info available.
#3 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
The program no longer exists.
(gdb)
Thanks,
--
Steve Kostecke
Public Key at gopher://kostecke.net or `finger st...@kostecke.net
n (argc=7, argv=0x7fffbebba8c8, envp=) at ../../dix/main.c:452
i = 1
error = 0
xauthfile =
alwaysCheckForInput = {0, 1}
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
The program no longer exists.
(gdb) quit
Thanks,
--
Steve Kostecke
Publi
Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= said:
>On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 19:55 -0500, Steve Kostecke wrote:
>
>> Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe.
>
>SIGPIPE is normal when a client dies without cleanly terminating its X
>connection. You can tell gdb to ignore SIGPIPE w
h?q=%231+in+_XSERVTransSocketWritev
(including http://bugs.debian.org/500887).
--
Steve Kostecke
Public Key at gopher://kostecke.net or `finger st...@kostecke.net`
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
vp=) at ../../dix/main.c:452
(gdb) quit
The program is running. Quit anyway (and detach it)? (y or n) Detaching from
program: /usr/bin/Xorg, process 10622
--
Steve Kostecke
Public Key at gopher://kostecke.net or `finger st...@kostecke.net`
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@list
w have:
13827 tty7 Ss+0:40 /usr/bin/Xorg :0 vt7 -nolisten tcp -auth
/var/lib/xdm/authdir/authfiles/A:0-vWZql0
14099 pts/0S+ 0:00 gdb /usr/bin/Xorg
--
Steve Kostecke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+18
Severity: important
I am experiencing repeated random X crashes / lockups on an AMD64 system
(ASUS M3A-H + AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core CPU). I've included
/proc/cpuinfo at the end of this report. This bug may be related to
the problem I reported in bug # 51388
Oopsie.
Upon further investigation, I'm actually using ubuntu xorg packages.
Please close this bug.
Package: xserver-xorg-video-vesa
Version: 1:1.3.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to install this package on an existing lenny system I find that it can't
be installed because
(1) this package depends on xserver-xorg-core
(2) xserver-xorg-core conflicts with xs
signment for us then please mail us your requirement to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and we will get back to you very shortly with a quick solution.
Thanks in advance,
Steve,
Manager,
www.dabberdesign.com
[if you dont want to receive mails please revert back with the subject line
"DONT MAIL ME"
reassign 314571 base-files
tags 314571 -wontfix
thanks
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:06:06PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:55:03PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The dpkg upgrade log that Jörg showed clearly indicates that this is not the
> > case; m
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 04:48:14PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:27:10AM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> >> recently, I've installed a new system with a minimal configuration. Then
&
dlocate, gt5, linuxdoc-tools, and lsb-core
appear to have spurious dependencies on either 'awk' or 'mawk | gawk'.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubunt
On 09-Jun-08, 16:24 (CDT), Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the upgrade to 7.3, the startup of my desktop environment (XFCE)
> is incredibly slow.
Today's upgrade to the release candidate of xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.8.191-1)
seems to have fixed this.
On 23-May-08, 10:30 (CDT), Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> found 482425 xinit/1.0.9-1
> thanks
>
> On 2008-05-22 16:15:31 -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>
> Do you mean that the bug has been added to 1.0.9 (as I could see on
> my machine)?
Yes. I reverted
server="$defaultserverargs"
<
<
<
---
> server=$defaultserver
> serverargs=$defaultserverargs
> display=$defaultdisplay
combined with the badly named "defaultserverargs" variable.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gate
===
Other stuff
===
That's the list of things I'm hoping to learn more about from this
review of teams. Of course, I'm sure there are many other things in
Debian that you'd like to ask or tell me about. By all means, talk t
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:42:41AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 21:02:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The problem is not that /usr/bin/X is suid-root. The problem is that
> > /usr/bin/X is now shipped in a package which is a dependency of *al
ra suid binary you don't need.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d against xserver 1.4, 1, sparc
> xserver-xorg-video-sunleo_1:1.1.0-2, rebuild against xserver 1.4, 1, sparc
> xserver-xorg-video-suntcx_1:1.1.0-2, rebuild against xserver 1.4, 1, sparc
Scheduled.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Dev
/etc/rc?.d (or, more accurately, whatever the
rc system's update-rc.d implements). That's the way I, generic Debian
sysadmin, expect things to behave. I'm startled when things don't work.
At a bare minimum, I think making the use of HEED_DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER
consistent between
m what's documented in both the English
and Spanish debconf templates.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debi
ta. Si las quita todas, será como si no hubiese quitado
ninguna, porque en ambos casos el servidor X intentará usar la resolución
más alta que haya disponible.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it
s.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418016;msg=24 for a
crash in another application related to this change. That one may reduce to
a bogus assumption about bpp vs. bit depth.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
d-qt_en_i386.deb for Debian testing.
FWIW, the problematic invocation has an 'image_bytes_per_line' value of '3'
and a 'width' value of '1', but the bits-per-pixel for the display is 32
(i.e., 4 bytes), so the check fails. I guess Opera i
864==by 0x875BD2D: (within /usr/lib/opera/9.10-20061214.6/opera)
+==3864== Address 0x8A2FC7E is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
So this gets you closer to the point of the failure, but still needs
unstripped opera source to make any progress on from this angle.
--
e bug.
I don't see any particular reason that graphicsmagick should be specially
discriminated against by the security team when it comes to segfaults on
untrusted input, so I'm leaving the severity at 'grave' for now.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me
ely sure this is the right
> thing to do :)
I believe the reason I didn't propose a patch to do this was precisely
because of --cflags handling, since xft does include some fontconfig headers
that clients will need to find the path for.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a
> 0 0
> + IFS='
> '
> + read -r _db_internal_line
> + RET='value set'
> + case ${_db_internal_line%%[ ]*} in
> + return 0
> + SAFE='value set'
> Why on earth is "$RET" now "value set", where it should be "0"?
te that tried to fix
this bug for etch, RC or not. I guess if the "fix" is just to document it,
that'd be ok, but I don't think that's a proper ultimate fix anyway.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debi
ff not changing
this for etch, given the risk of error.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
when the upgrade breaks in the
middle.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
mping the soname is still the right thing to do. But
there's sure to be resistance upstream from those indoctrinated into the Red
Hat school of library management, as there was for freetype, so the path of
least resistance would probably be to leave the soname alone, "hoping for
th
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 01:39:34AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm filing this as a serious bug against the Xorg server, because Debian
> ships 64bit kernels on i386
No, actually, we don't. Do you think it's fair to downgrade this bug then?
--
Steve Langasek
05 3511020K 1K 11021K 21117 Bureau
> 120 173 371 172 405 841K 15K856K 21115 xfwm4
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Geforce"
> Driver "nvidia"
Is this problem reproducible w
o satisfy a virtual
> dependency, while my earlier testing suggested that sarge's aptitude
> pulled in all drivers.
So what should be done with this bug? Should it be merged with bug #405639?
Do you think it needs to be treated as RC independently of bug #405639?
(FWIW, I don't; smo
I haven't reproduced this bug recently but have not run Debian under
vmware (desktop) in over a year.
Thanks,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Brice Goglin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 5:55 PM
To: Daniel Suha; Etzell, Steve
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
lding lnx_ev56 with the right build flags gives me a working X server
again. :)
Patch to follow soon.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROT
e dependency.
The reason the Recommends were changed is that on upgrades the Depends: on
xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 were insufficient to pull in
xserver-xorg-video-all on upgrade in many cases. I don't know whether
adding in the -vesa is going to make a differenc
ent at any time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
'fixed' font must always be available AIUI, so
why should the metapackage need to be pulled in before xfonts-base is?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
g this bug -- the one that was originally reported -- as fixed
in version 2:1.0.2-10, which it was.
If you have a problem with font display still in Xorg 7.1, please open a
*separate* bug report. (e.g., Fox, if you have xserver-xorg installed but
your xorg.conf was not automatically updated for you, please
my Matrox
> Millennium II (pci) on my DEC Alpha machine.
Done (and I know your pain :).
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 395927 serious
severity 396279 important
thanks
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:29:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The Sarge package xlbiff includes the file /usr/X11R6/bin/xlbiff
> The xlbiff package in sarge is at version 4.1-1, and x11-common in etch
> already has a con
b-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> The Sarge package xlbiff includes the file /usr/X11R6/bin/xlbiff
The xlbiff package in sarge is at version 4.1-1, and x11-common in etch
already has a conflicts: with xlbiff (<= 4.1-1.1). Do you have any idea
what's missing here?
Tha
guillemets, « »)" :)
Referring to these as "doubled <>" seems *very* unnecessary. Either you can
see guillemets in your encoding, in which case it's redundant; or you can't,
in which case explanations don't make the option in question any more
desira
of a poor approximation -- mistranslating "«»" as
"Doubled <>" isn't going to change the symbols actually used, so if there
are any encoding issues at all, might as well expose them /before/ the user
selects that option ;)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
bug.
Is it possible that xkb-data was upgraded at the same time? Could this be
related to bug #394060?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
27;forcemerge' command without sending a
proper message to -done.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
-
you don't use
aptitude, then /var/log/dpkg.log?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
> set
> > +e block):
> > db_input "$PRIORITY" "$TEMPLATE"
> > retval=$?
> > if [ $retval -ne 0 ] ; then debug_echo "v_s_d_i/db_input $PRIORITY
> > $TEMPLATE"
> > ; fi
> > if [ $? -eq 30 ]; then
> The last l
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 02:08:46PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 02:29:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:28:45AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > tags 368582 patch
> > > > t
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:28:45AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > tags 368582 patch
> > tags 384057 patch
> > tags 384282 patch
> > tags 386185 patch
> > tags 369895 patch
> > thanks
> I think that this NMU will also fix #359328,
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 12:10:56PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 04:29:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > A Hurd porter would of course be able to do their own subsequent NMU if
> > they're confident in this patch.
> OK, do you prefer us to NMU i
ad. If I don't hear any objections by Sunday evening
(UTC-0700), I will proceed with a 0-day NMU of mesa to get Xorg 7.1 unstuck.
Test packages will also be available shortly from
<http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/mesa/>.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever l
well as for experimental, and honor this decision in my NMU.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:11:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I will also be fixing this bug and bug #386185 in the process.
> Please also apply the last
this forward for etch one way or another.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
log for sid is attached.
> Yes, unfortunately x11proto-core 7.0.3 or above (or something) breaks
> the build of libx11 << 1.0.1.
Then we have a problem, given that David says the new libx11 is not
targetted for etch and the new x11proto-core is already there.
--
Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:05:51PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:08:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Clarification: the libxfixes change is a shlibs change, not an soname
> > change. ("soversion" normally refers to the numeric component of
eak up!)
- libx11 will be kept at the 7.0 version for etch, because no one has time
to sort out the segfault problems, and the new version of this lib isn't
on the critical path for any of the other updates.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
is that
/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/ is present, and includes the reference to cursor
in fonts.dir there.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
somewhere else for the trouble. If you upgraded to sid today, you might
look at whether the new xserver-xorg-core package is the cause, and try
upgrading to the version in incoming.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to s
> ABI mismatch.
already fixed in incoming.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 04:53:56PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:06:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:48:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:05:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:48:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:05:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Since this warning note has been added specifically because the xserver is
> > being removed in situations we don't want it to, and the removal
an option, but
it would be much nicer if someone could figure out how to keep the xserver
from being removed on upgrade in the first place.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMA
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:30:20PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:34 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > ... could [libgl1-mesa-dev] supply the GLw library as does
> > libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev?
>
> No, and I'm not sure what the point would be, given
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:51:27AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 09:10 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > It appears that libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev is built from mesa 6.4.2, whilst
> > GL-from-xorg is built from mesa 6.9.0.
>
> There's no such
Is xorg 7.1 so different than 7.0 that it couldn't be in testing by the
freeze? Just email me and let me know if I could be of help in any way, I
would love to see 7.1 on etch.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:58:10AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:48:46PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Before the Great Fracturing, I believe this file was in
> > xlibmesa-gl-dev. Where may I find it now?
>
> GLw is not built; it's not i
Hello,
Before the Great Fracturing, I believe this file was in
xlibmesa-gl-dev. Where may I find it now?
Thanks,
-Steve
- Forwarded message from Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:33:36 +0200
From: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject
s even
with X.org 7, in that case the X maintainers may be able to help ensure a
fix makes it in for etch.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.22
The sun* drivers for Creator, Elite, Leo, and other Sun framebuffers are now
packaged separately from xserver-xorg as of 7.0. packages.debian.org
indicates that these driver packages are "unavailable".
xserver-xorg 6.9.0 provided working drivers for at l
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:40:03PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I think the patch might need a few more tweaks still, though; I'll ponder it
> > and commit a fix to the svn repo this weekend.
> Nice, thanks. But see comments below about xfonts-utils.postinst.
> > >
201 - 300 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
