On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 01:46:53PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > All I want is for my Windows keys to send Meta, and xterm to treat that like
> > Escape. This requires XTerm*metaSendsEscape: true. [For some reason, I
> > have
> > to start an x
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All I want is for my Windows keys to send Meta, and xterm to treat that like
> Escape. This requires XTerm*metaSendsEscape: true. [For some reason, I have
> to start an xterm, run xrdb in it, and start a new xterm for this to take
> effect. I can'
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 10:26:52PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 03:00:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> [...]
> > Without metaSendsEscape alt-b generates an accented a. I turn on
> > altwin:meta_win:
> >
> > shift Shift_L (0x32), Shift_R (0x3e)
> > lock
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 03:00:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[...]
> Without metaSendsEscape alt-b generates an accented a. I turn on
> altwin:meta_win:
>
> shift Shift_L (0x32), Shift_R (0x3e)
> lockCaps_Lock (0x42)
> control Control_L (0x25), Control_R (0x6d)
> mod1
I added some information to #259740, but I'm hopelessly confused as to what
bug which bug report is describing; nothing discussed in that bug report has
helped me so far.
I'm trying to use altwin:meta_win. Trying very, very hard, in fact. Not in
any complicated X applications; just in xterm. Th
Charl P. Botha wrote:
> It's not always the desired solution. Some keyboards _do_ have separate
> META keys and always binding meta to alt would be very rude. The same goes
> for binding escape to meta.
Ok. But rxvt or gnome-terminal for example work out-of-the-box. I'll
try to find out what th
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> > first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> > Thomas Dickey.
>
> I meant the second one. If the
Charl P. Botha wrote:
> Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> Thomas Dickey.
I meant the second one. If the first one is a working solution, can't
it (or anonther solution) be integrated
Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
Thomas Dickey.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:17:43PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Tor Slettnes wrote:
> > Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I
Tor Slettnes wrote:
> Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
> Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
> Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
> Charl> to work in an xterm, e.g. on the command-line (e.g. alt
Charl P. Botha wrote:
> It's not always the desired solution. Some keyboards _do_ have separate
> META keys and always binding meta to alt would be very rude. The same goes
> for binding escape to meta.
Ok. But rxvt or gnome-terminal for example work out-of-the-box. I'll
try to find out what t
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> > first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> > Thomas Dickey.
>
> I meant the second one. If the
Charl P. Botha wrote:
> Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> Thomas Dickey.
I meant the second one. If the first one is a working solution, can't
it (or anonther solution) be integrate
Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
Thomas Dickey.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:17:43PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Tor Slettnes wrote:
> > Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment,
Tor Slettnes wrote:
> Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
> Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
> Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
> Charl> to work in an xterm, e.g. on the command-line (e.g. al
> "Charl" == Charl P Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
Charl> to work in an xterm, e.
> "Charl" == Charl P Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
Charl> to work in an xterm, e
Dear Debian-Xers,
At the moment, I need to set the X resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true
and to do xmodmap -e "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key
combinations to work in an xterm, e.g. on the command-line (e.g. alt-f and
alt-b for skipping words forwards and backwards) or in programs l
Dear Debian-Xers,
At the moment, I need to set the X resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true
and to do xmodmap -e "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key
combinations to work in an xterm, e.g. on the command-line (e.g. alt-f and
alt-b for skipping words forwards and backwards) or in programs
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 03:57:16PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 6.X.2001 at 23:06 Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > I'll see if I can figure out how to create an options file for it. (A
> > la /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/ctrl).
>
> I haven't tested this as now I am not using X:
Thanks! This defin
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 03:57:16PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 6.X.2001 at 23:06 Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > I'll see if I can figure out how to create an options file for it. (A
> > la /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/ctrl).
>
> I haven't tested this as now I am not using X:
Thanks! This defi
On 6.X.2001 at 23:06 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I'll see if I can figure out how to create an options file for it. (A
> la /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/ctrl).
I haven't tested this as now I am not using X:
partial modifier_keys
xkb_symbols "alt
On 6.X.2001 at 23:06 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I'll see if I can figure out how to create an options file for it. (A
> la /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/ctrl).
I haven't tested this as now I am not using X:
partial modifier_keys
xkb_symbols "al
* Derek J Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011008 00:17]:
> Yeah, I'm used to the separate keys. I still don't like the position of
> the caps lock on a sun5 keyboard (I think that's the type on an Ultra
Wow, I wish all users were so civil about the keymappings on suns. :)
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECT
Yeah, I'm used to the separate keys. I still don't like the position of
the caps lock on a sun5 keyboard (I think that's the type on an Ultra
sparc 5). But, that's an issue I can fix with xmodmap when using my
Solaris account on campus. If I want to re-enable the extra keys, I can
just use xmodmap
* Derek J Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011008 00:17]:
> Yeah, I'm used to the separate keys. I still don't like the position of
> the caps lock on a sun5 keyboard (I think that's the type on an Ultra
Wow, I wish all users were so civil about the keymappings on suns. :)
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTEC
Yeah, I'm used to the separate keys. I still don't like the position of
the caps lock on a sun5 keyboard (I think that's the type on an Ultra
sparc 5). But, that's an issue I can fix with xmodmap when using my
Solaris account on campus. If I want to re-enable the extra keys, I can
just use xmodma
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:53:25PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Having separate alt and meta keys appears to be popular with no one,
> > hence this change.
>
> Having separate alt and meta keys is one of the things that really
> impressed me about Debian in the first place. (Far from the only
>
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:53:25PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Having separate alt and meta keys appears to be popular with no one,
> > hence this change.
>
> Having separate alt and meta keys is one of the things that really
> impressed me about Debian in the first place. (Far from the only
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 03:56:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Especially Emacs users.
Xtifr looks up.
> Having separate alt and meta keys appears to be popular with no one,
> hence this change.
Having separate alt and meta keys is one of the things that really
impressed me about Debian in
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 03:56:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Especially Emacs users.
Xtifr looks up.
> Having separate alt and meta keys appears to be popular with no one,
> hence this change.
Having separate alt and meta keys is one of the things that really
impressed me about Debian i
Could people apply the following patch and tell me if things continue
to work properly for them?
Especially Emacs users.
Having separate alt and meta keys appears to be popular with no one,
hence this change.
If you want alt and meta on different keys, leave the file as-is.
Thanks!
--- /etc/X1
Could people apply the following patch and tell me if things continue
to work properly for them?
Especially Emacs users.
Having separate alt and meta keys appears to be popular with no one,
hence this change.
If you want alt and meta on different keys, leave the file as-is.
Thanks!
--- /etc/X
HvdM> Aah, I see. I talked to this friend, I think he lied, couldn't figure it
HvdM> out. I've installed on another machine where I discovered this to be the
HvdM> case. So to get e.g. emacs to use alt instead of win-key (more
HvdM> conveniently placed ;) I need to edit the X keymap?
Just change t
HvdM> Aah, I see. I talked to this friend, I think he lied, couldn't figure it
HvdM> out. I've installed on another machine where I discovered this to be the
HvdM> case. So to get e.g. emacs to use alt instead of win-key (more
HvdM> conveniently placed ;) I need to edit the X keymap?
Just change
Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>
> > > I will go play with the Win-key's when I get the chance. The odd thing
> > > is I have the same configuration in my config file, and I also have
> > > win-keys, but alt works fine...
> >
> > Still does, it's just mapped differently. ;) Upstream changed the default
> > I will go play with the Win-key's when I get the chance. The odd thing
> > is I have the same configuration in my config file, and I also have
> > win-keys, but alt works fine...
>
> Still does, it's just mapped differently. ;) Upstream changed the default
> mapping.
Aah, I see. I talked to t
Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>
> > > I will go play with the Win-key's when I get the chance. The odd thing
> > > is I have the same configuration in my config file, and I also have
> > > win-keys, but alt works fine...
> >
> > Still does, it's just mapped differently. ;) Upstream changed the defaul
> > I will go play with the Win-key's when I get the chance. The odd thing
> > is I have the same configuration in my config file, and I also have
> > win-keys, but alt works fine...
>
> Still does, it's just mapped differently. ;) Upstream changed the default
> mapping.
Aah, I see. I talked to
Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> >
> > You have a Win**-Keyboard, Meta is mapped to the left Win-key.
> >
>
> I will go play with the Win-key's when I get the chance. The odd thing
> is I have the same configuration in my config file, and I also have
> win-keys, but alt works fine...
Still does, it
Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> >
> > You have a Win**-Keyboard, Meta is mapped to the left Win-key.
> >
>
> I will go play with the Win-key's when I get the chance. The odd thing
> is I have the same configuration in my config file, and I also have
> win-keys, but alt works fine...
Still does, i
> Are you using i386, what kind of keyboard do you have, what is your
> keyboard-configuration in XF86Config?
It is i386, yes.
Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
>
> You have a Win**-Keyboard, Meta is mapped to the left Win-key.
>
I wi
> Are you using i386, what kind of keyboard do you have, what is your
> keyboard-configuration in XF86Config?
It is i386, yes.
Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
>
> You have a Win**-Keyboard, Meta is mapped to the left Win-key.
>
I w
I ran xemacs on a friend's machine... pressing Alt-X gives me "A-x not
defined." - what is broken here? It should return M-x, so where is the
keymapping broken?
He is running unstable, usually updated every few days.
Thanks,
Hugo van der Merwe
ps. please CC to me, thanks.
I ran xemacs on a friend's machine... pressing Alt-X gives me "A-x not
defined." - what is broken here? It should return M-x, so where is the
keymapping broken?
He is running unstable, usually updated every few days.
Thanks,
Hugo van der Merwe
ps. please CC to me, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
45 matches
Mail list logo
