On 2007-11-04 00:20+0100 Brice Goglin wrote:
0:2:1 is not another graphic board, it is a kind of fake ID that old windows
used to manage the second screen or so. X does not need it (and can't
use it).
Thanks for the update-pciids tip. For the record, the first few lines from
lspci now read
0
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I assume all the "Unknown device" strings mean that this kind of
> hardware is
> so new that it hasn't yet gotten into the authoritative PCI
> identification
> data base (assuming such a database exists) or that it is there or Debian
> testing does not yet have the relevant u
On 2007-11-03 09:24+0100 Brice Goglin wrote:
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Worse yet, only the VGA one is documented in the intel man page. However,
when I tried
Option "Monitor-VGA-1" "Sony CPD-15SF2"
encouraged by your remark above but contrary to the man page that (finally)
solved the iss
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Worse yet, only the VGA one is documented in the intel man page. However,
> when I tried
>
> Option "Monitor-VGA-1" "Sony CPD-15SF2"
>
> encouraged by your remark above but contrary to the man page that (finally)
> solved the issue of having a good refresh rate ri
On 2007-11-02 20:49+0100 Brice Goglin wrote:
In particular is there some confusion between VGA and VGA-1 that could be
causing the problem with adding modelines?
Possibly, yes.
Option "Monitor-VGA" "Sony CPD-15SF2"
Monitor-VGA-1 might be better since the output of xrandr seems to
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> You should adapt the xorg.conf man page to point to that to save this issue
> coming up again and again for users like me who are familiar with X from
> their last hardware buy (which was three years ago for me) and for X
> newbies as well who know enough to check the xorg.co
6 matches
Mail list logo
