X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread X Strike Force SVN Admin
Author: ishikawa Date: 2003-06-10 06:44:45 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003) New Revision: 172 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff Log: always disable FontLibSharedFreeType Modified:

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172) @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ keyboard away from me. *

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, not everything. The current

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, not everything. The current

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput YES @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ This seems out-of-date? Hmm, yes, but only

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian:. patches

2003-06-10 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput YES @@

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Branden Robinson
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies. On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac does not.. :/ That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours probably

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac does not.. :/ That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on

X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread X Strike Force SVN Admin
Author: ishikawa Date: 2003-06-10 06:44:45 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003) New Revision: 172 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff Log: always disable FontLibSharedFreeType Modified:

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172) @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ keyboard away from me. *

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread James Troup
X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput YES @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ This seems out-of-date? -- James

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, not everything. The current

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, not everything. The current

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput YES @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ This seems out-of-date? Hmm, yes, but only

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput YES @@

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Branden Robinson
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies. On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac does not.. :/ That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours probably

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture + #define HasLinuxInput

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac does not.. :/ That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:52:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to a few porters tonight. You could just point 'em at a specific date in the nightly tarballs. http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/ For Jack Howarth, the above