On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:11:29AM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> This is now a FAQ answered in the Debian X package docs :) Synopsis:
> Debian is waiting for the modular, autotooled X.org sources to
> happen before shifting to the new X release, on the grounds that
> otherwise they'd have to do
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 12:33 -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm talking about 2d Xdrivers, where current MergedFB is built. I think
> these can be built with the Mesa/lib/r200_dri.so files that live in
> X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so?
Nope, compl
> >
> I know, this causes a problem for any one building Xfree86 DRI. We need
> to fold the DRI xc tree into Xfree86 or stop using Xfree86 alltogether.
> I'm talking about 2d Xdrivers, where current MergedFB is built. I think
> these can be built with the Mesa/lib/r200_dri.so files that live in
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > I know, this causes a problem for any one building Xfree86 DRI. We
> need
> > to fold the DRI xc tree into Xfree86 or stop using Xfree86
> alltogether.
>
> > I'm talking about 2d Xdrivers, where current MergedFB is built. I
> think
> > th
Sorry about the re-post, some mail servers didn't like my previous
mail-header.
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 17:46 -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> --- Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:41:38PM -0600, John Lightsey w
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 17:46 -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> --- Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:41:38PM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
> > > First let me say that if anyone would like to take over updating the
> > > dri-trunk-sid packages on a semi-regular ba
--- John Lightsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First let me say that if anyone would like to take over updating the
> dri-trunk-sid packages on a semi-regular basis, I'd really appreciate
> it. I don't track the Debian X or DRI mailing lists closely enough to
> keep up with changes.
>
> On Tue,
--- Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:41:38PM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
> > First let me say that if anyone would like to take over updating the
> > dri-trunk-sid packages on a semi-regular basis, I'd really appreciate
> > it. I don't track the Debian X o
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:41:38PM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
> First let me say that if anyone would like to take over updating the
> dri-trunk-sid packages on a semi-regular basis, I'd really appreciate
> it. I don't track the Debian X or DRI mailing lists closely enough to
> keep up with chang
First let me say that if anyone would like to take over updating the
dri-trunk-sid packages on a semi-regular basis, I'd really appreciate
it. I don't track the Debian X or DRI mailing lists closely enough to
keep up with changes.
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 15:00 -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> The sourc
The source I'm using contains the old DRI xc. I can see where the old xc
source is needed to build the OLD Xserver and Mesa is needed there to
build it's dri, glx, and opengl Xdrivers. How ever I can't see why this
old xc code has not been diffed in to debian's Xfree86? Would submitting
a patch
11 matches
Mail list logo
