David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fantastic! Let's target this for -6 then. In the meantime, is there any
disadvantage to compiling the default xterm with 256 color support? What
sort of increased memory requirements and is there anything else we're not
aware of?
If it's compiled for
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:01:01PM +0200, David MartÃnez Moreno wrote:
Not only planning, I already have a semi-clean xterm tree and I need to
set
up proper options for configure and check that every thing we shipped with
X.Org is going to be shipped with latest xterm. After that, it
I asked for this some time ago in withlist bug #305540 but it was left
without effect. Maybe you guys where too busy with preperaing releasing
sarge then, and/or didn't want to introduce such changes just before
sarge release, but now in the post-sarge era maybe my plea will get some
response.
Miernik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian packages of X are made in such a way, that you cannot compile
only one of them, you have to recompile the whole Xorg set, which is
huge download of sources and takes a really long time, so it's very
difficult for example for me to package xterm with
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Miernik wrote:
The Debian packages of X are made in such a way, that you cannot compile
only one of them, you have to recompile the whole Xorg set, which is
huge download of sources and takes a really long time, so it's very
difficult for example for
5 matches
Mail list logo
