Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-14 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:13:43PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:00:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I also resolved mouse issues I had by changing the repeat_type value in /etc/gpm.conf to "raw" ... /dev/gpmdata was causing erratic behavior before

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-14 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:13:43PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:00:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I also resolved mouse issues I had by changing the repeat_type value in /etc/gpm.conf to raw ... /dev/gpmdata was causing erratic behavior before

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread mtoups
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 at 16:03:53 -0700, Marc Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Load "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so" You were absolutely right -- replacing "glx" with the above did the trick. I don't know why I missed this, as I got 4.0.1 working on a different debian box

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:00:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I also resolved mouse issues I had by changing the repeat_type value in /etc/gpm.conf to "raw" ... /dev/gpmdata was causing erratic behavior before (gpm's fault, not X). So now gpm and X get along well, so everything

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread mtoups
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: Repeat in what gpm calls ms3 and what X calls IntelliMouse. Unless you really LIKE shooting yourself in the foot. That worked also (ie, same result as type "raw" in gpm.conf and "IMPS/2" in XF86Config) ... I assumed that repeat type "imps2"

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
Though in bad taste, I'll reply above but leave the message intact below. In all protocols except ms3/IntelliMouse X4 attempts to communicate with the mouse, trying this into a fifo is, err, a bad idea, largely because X4 gets it right back as if it was sent by the mouse, resulting in the

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread mtoups
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 at 16:03:53 -0700, Marc Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Load /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so You were absolutely right -- replacing glx with the above did the trick. I don't know why I missed this, as I got 4.0.1 working on a different debian box

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:00:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I also resolved mouse issues I had by changing the repeat_type value in /etc/gpm.conf to raw ... /dev/gpmdata was causing erratic behavior before (gpm's fault, not X). So now gpm and X get along well, so everything works

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread mtoups
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: Repeat in what gpm calls ms3 and what X calls IntelliMouse. Unless you really LIKE shooting yourself in the foot. That worked also (ie, same result as type raw in gpm.conf and IMPS/2 in XF86Config) ... I assumed that repeat type imps2 would be

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-13 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
Though in bad taste, I'll reply above but leave the message intact below. In all protocols except ms3/IntelliMouse X4 attempts to communicate with the mouse, trying this into a fifo is, err, a bad idea, largely because X4 gets it right back as if it was sent by the mouse, resulting in the erratic

re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-12 Thread mtoups
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 20:57:16 -0700, Josh Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just recently updated to the phase2 debs (version4), and all I get is sig11 constantly, at random times. Sometimes as soon as I start X, sometimes no for almost an hour. It varies, but it NEVER stays resident more

re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-12 Thread mtoups
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 20:57:16 -0700, Josh Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just recently updated to the phase2 debs (version4), and all I get is sig11 constantly, at random times. Sometimes as soon as I start X, sometimes no for almost an hour. It varies, but it NEVER stays resident more

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-12 Thread Marc Martinez
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:57:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I've been using the phase1 debs of X4.0.1 with the 0.9.4 NVidia drivers on a GeForce2, and haven't had any sig11's -- but the server hangs (and the displacy is garbled, have to reboot blindly) if the line #Load

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-10 Thread Seth R Arnold
Josh, I have two main thoughts. First, try to do something like compile your kernel (when running in a text console :) to make sure your memory isn't running beyond its limits. If you can compile kernels fine, then you probably have fine memory. :) I was getting signal 11s when I had my sync

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-10 Thread Boris Erdmann
Josh Carroll wrote: I just recently updated to the phase2 debs (version4), and all I get is sig11 constantly, at random times. Sometimes as soon as I start X, sometimes not for almost an hour. It varies, but it NEVER stays resident more than an hour or two. This is really annoying, and I'm not

Re: xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-09 Thread Seth R Arnold
Josh, I have two main thoughts. First, try to do something like compile your kernel (when running in a text console :) to make sure your memory isn't running beyond its limits. If you can compile kernels fine, then you probably have fine memory. :) I was getting signal 11s when I had my sync

xfree86-common_4.0.1-0phase2v4_all.deb

2000-09-09 Thread Josh Carroll
I just recently updated to the phase2 debs (version4), and all I get is sig11 constantly, at random times. Sometimes as soon as I start X, sometimes not for almost an hour. It varies, but it NEVER stays resident more than an hour or two. This is really annoying, and I'm not sure what the problem