Branden Robinson wrote:
> I think the original code from patch #100 is wrong, so I am dropping
> that hunk of the patch, and patch #400 entirely since it just #ifdefs
> off the patch I'm dropping.
Since I did the original hacking to build xfree86 for hppa,
I might be responsible for that. But I ca
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:53:34AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> MMIO_OUT32 would probably be the macro for this.
The original code did this:
switch (iDWord)
{
case 0: MMIO_MOVE32(pDst + 0, 0, *(pSrc + 0));
case 1: MMIO_MOVE32(pDst +
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:29, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:20:17AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > On m68k, mac64 dynamic loading driver cannot have worked from
> > before. Because xf86WriteMmio32Be is not defined anywhere.
> >
> > Perhaps, we should define xf86WriteMmi
[Please followup to debian-x. I am not subscribed to debian-hppa.]
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:29:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:20:17AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > On m68k, mac64 dynamic loading driver cannot have worked from
> > before. Because xf86Write
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:20:17AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> On m68k, mac64 dynamic loading driver cannot have worked from
> before. Because xf86WriteMmio32Be is not defined anywhere.
>
> Perhaps, we should define xf86WriteMmio32Be function in
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/compi
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 14:36, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 03:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 04:27, Scott Henson wrote:
>
> > > and I cannot start it with startx as a normal user, though root can.
> > > xinit does bring up XF86 though. When using startx the x serv
Updated sources.list, apt-get update and then dist-upgrade. Worked
fine, no problems during the upgrade. Runs great, not experienced any
problems, thus far. One point of interest though :
>From running startx, gnome (1.4) launches much quicker than on XF86
4.1.x (used to be about 10 secs from s
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 03:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 04:27, Scott Henson wrote:
> > > GATOS doesn't do 2D acceleration AFAIK, don't you mean 3D anyway?
> > >
> > > Either way, try
> > >
> > > deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-trunk/./
> >
> > I upg
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 04:27, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 21:08, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 02:55, Csan wrote:
> > >
> > > > > is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
> > >
> > > > What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
> > >
> >
On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 21:08, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 02:55, Csan wrote:
> >
> > > > is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
> >
> > > What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
> >
> > > deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-mach64/
Hey guys,
Michael's dri-trunk stuff works.
Splendid... !
This is actually the first time GTKRadiant and Quake3 works at the same time!
I am extremely excited and thankful to you.
(Especially Michael? :))
And thanks for the explanatin, Mike, it helped a lot to understand what was
going on. :)
I'd
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 15:13, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> >> I've got a patch for 4.2.0 to add the latest code, however it was
> >> reported as not fully working so I disabled it until I have time
> >> to debug/troubleshoot.
> >
> >Can you be a bit more specif
On 25 Aug 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> >Are there any plans for integrating gatos 2d aacceleration into the xfree6
>> >project's next debian release.
>>
>> Radeon 2D acceleration is implemented in two different ways. The
>> first method, MMIO, is used when DRI is disabled. The second
>> way,
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 07:20, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >
> >I would need 2d acceleration for my ATI Radeon 7200 (VIVO 64MB DDR) very bad.
> >I'd like to dive myself into Quake 3 mapping with GTKRadiant map editor, but
> >I
> >can't since the ati driver shipped with the current xserver, does not
> >
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Csan wrote:
>Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:55:25 +0200
>From: Csan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Subject: # Re: Gatos deb's (was: Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v3 (source,
>i386)av
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 02:55, Csan wrote:
>
> > > is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
>
> > What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
>
> > deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-mach64/ ./
>
> I would need 2d acceleration for my ATI Radeon 7200 (VIV
Hi,
> > is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
> What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
> deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-mach64/ ./
I would need 2d acceleration for my ATI Radeon 7200 (VIVO 64MB DDR) very bad.
I'd like to dive myself into
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> I wonder if the problems will turn out to be big-endian related?
>> It would be nice to be able to debug it on a faster arch than
>> m68k.
>>
>> I'll see if Branden has the old patch and I'll
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> [1 ]
>> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> >> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:52:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:55:57PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Thanks for the hard work. Is there any specific issue holding XFree86 from
> > upload to unstable, or are you simply taking the time to make "due
> > diligence",
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Changes:
>> >> xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
>> >> .
>> >>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEAS
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> Changes:
>> > >> xfree86 (4.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:55:57PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Thanks for the hard work. Is there any specific issue holding XFree86 from
> upload to unstable, or are you simply taking the time to make "due diligence",
> as the suits call it?
Partly due diligence, partly this:
http://bugs.debia
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> Changes:
>> > >> xfree86 (4.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:07:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Changes:
> xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
>*** . DO NOT FILE BUGS AGAINST THIS RELEASE
> WITH
>*** THE DEBIAN BUG TRACKING SYSTEM. AN
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 12:08, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-22 12:29:59 +0200, Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:58, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Thu, 2002-08-22 12:29:59 +0200, Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:58, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:58, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Branden Rob
On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> Changes:
> > >
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I'm about half way through a build for m68k on crest.debian.org.
> >> Let me know if I should kill it please.
>
> Please keep and upload m68k binaries :-)
Will do.
>
> >> Will you, ishikawa, be doing m68k regularly?
>
>
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Branden Robinson wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> >> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> Changes:
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Changes:
>> >> xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
>> >> .
>> >>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Changes:
> >> xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
> >> .
> >>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
> >
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Changes:
>> xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
>>*** . DO NOT FILE BUGS AGAINST THIS RELEASE
>> WITH
>>*** THE DEBIAN
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
.
*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
*** . DO NOT FILE BUGS AGAINST THIS RELEASE WITH
*** THE DEBIAN BUG TRACKING SYSTEM. ANY SUCH REPORTS WILL BE CLOSED.
.
* TODO: more mips weirdness; somehow BuildHt
35 matches
Mail list logo
