Branden Robinson wrote:
I think the original code from patch #100 is wrong, so I am dropping
that hunk of the patch, and patch #400 entirely since it just #ifdefs
off the patch I'm dropping.
Since I did the original hacking to build xfree86 for hppa,
I might be responsible for that. But I
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:29, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:20:17AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
On m68k, mac64 dynamic loading driver cannot have worked from
before. Because xf86WriteMmio32Be is not defined anywhere.
Perhaps, we should define xf86WriteMmio32Be
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:53:34AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
MMIO_OUT32 would probably be the macro for this.
The original code did this:
switch (iDWord)
{
case 0: MMIO_MOVE32(pDst + 0, 0, *(pSrc + 0));
case 1: MMIO_MOVE32(pDst +
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 04:27, Scott Henson wrote:
On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 21:08, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 02:55, Csan wrote:
is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
deb
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 03:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 04:27, Scott Henson wrote:
snip
GATOS doesn't do 2D acceleration AFAIK, don't you mean 3D anyway?
Either way, try
deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-trunk/./
I upgraded recently
Updated sources.list, apt-get update and then dist-upgrade. Worked
fine, no problems during the upgrade. Runs great, not experienced any
problems, thus far. One point of interest though :
From running startx, gnome (1.4) launches much quicker than on XF86
4.1.x (used to be about 10 secs from
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 14:36, Scott Henson wrote:
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 03:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 04:27, Scott Henson wrote:
snip
and I cannot start it with startx as a normal user, though root can.
xinit does bring up XF86 though. When using startx the x server
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Csan wrote:
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:55:25 +0200
From: Csan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: # Re: Gatos deb's (was: Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v3 (source,
i386)available at the X Strike Force)
Hi
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 07:20, Mike A. Harris wrote:
I would need 2d acceleration for my ATI Radeon 7200 (VIVO 64MB DDR) very bad.
I'd like to dive myself into Quake 3 mapping with GTKRadiant map editor, but
I
can't since the ati driver shipped with the current xserver, does not
contains
On 25 Aug 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Are there any plans for integrating gatos 2d aacceleration into the xfree6
project's next debian release.
Radeon 2D acceleration is implemented in two different ways. The
first method, MMIO, is used when DRI is disabled. The second
way, uses the
On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 21:08, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 02:55, Csan wrote:
is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-mach64/ ./
I
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Younie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
I wonder if the problems will turn out to be big-endian related?
It would be nice to be able to debug it on a faster arch than
m68k.
I'll see if Branden has the old patch and I'll try and find what
has
Hi,
is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-mach64/ ./
I would need 2d acceleration for my ATI Radeon 7200 (VIVO 64MB DDR) very bad.
I'd like to dive myself into
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 02:55, Csan wrote:
is there any chance for gatos deb's for i386 and powerpc?
What do you need it for? If it's about Mach64, try
deb http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/debian/dri-mach64/ ./
I would need 2d acceleration for my ATI Radeon 7200 (VIVO 64MB DDR)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
.
*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
***
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:52:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:55:57PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Thanks for the hard work. Is there any specific issue holding XFree86 from
upload to unstable, or are you simply taking the time to make due
diligence,
as the
On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3)
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:58, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2002-08-22 12:29:59 +0200, Michel D?nzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:58, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 12:08, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2002-08-22 12:29:59 +0200, Michel D?nzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:58, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-21 14:35:04 -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:07:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
.
*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
*** debian-x@lists.debian.org. DO NOT FILE BUGS AGAINST THIS RELEASE
WITH
*** THE DEBIAN BUG
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
xfree86
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:55:57PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Thanks for the hard work. Is there any specific issue holding XFree86 from
upload to unstable, or are you simply taking the time to make due diligence,
as the suits call it?
Partly due diligence, partly this:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
xfree86
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
.
*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
***
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
.
*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Younie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:16:25AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
Rick Younie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about half way through a build for m68k on crest.debian.org.
Let me know if I should kill it please.
Please keep and upload m68k binaries :-)
Will do.
Will you, ishikawa, be doing m68k regularly?
I'm not m68k
Changes:
xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
.
*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
*** debian-x@lists.debian.org. DO NOT FILE BUGS AGAINST THIS RELEASE WITH
*** THE DEBIAN BUG TRACKING SYSTEM. ANY SUCH REPORTS WILL BE CLOSED.
.
* TODO: more mips
30 matches
Mail list logo
