Does anyone know if there has ever been attempt to have Bigelow and
Holmes licensing changed so that it fits dfsg?
Yes, both by me and Branden.
What was the result of your attempts? Did they reject the idea?
I'm CC-ing this to Charles Bigelow in case I misrepresent something.
As usual,
I wonder if Bigelow and Holmes would allow modification of their fonts
with a clause that the name must be changed.
Does anyone know if there has ever been attempt to have Bigelow and
Holmes licensing changed so that it fits dfsg?
OTOH, does the inclusion of these two truetype fonts really make
I wonder if Bigelow and Holmes would allow modification of their fonts
with a clause that the name must be changed.
I doubt it. If you do contact them on this matter, please make it
very clear that you are not speaking for XFree86, who are happy with
the current license. (This is the official
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:02:07AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
What was the result of your attempts? Did they reject the idea?
They never replied to my message.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Men use thought only to justify
Debian GNU/Linux |their wrong
Hi all,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:27:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:59:52PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
These packages are not
Michael Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
These packages are not included in the 4.2.0 series of debs. Do they
just have different names? Is there some reason we don't
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:00:31PM +0800, Anthony Fok wrote:
According to www.rpmfind.net, Red Hat's XFree86-truetype-fonts package
contains:
[...]
i.e. XFree86-truetype-fonts in Red Hat corresponds to the
xfonts-scalable-nonfree package in Debian. :-)
Ah, so all Michael had to do was
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 06:08:56AM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
The TrueType fonts from xfree86-truetype-fonts[1] are in
xfree86-nonfree-truetype[2]. xft[3] contains the new Xft stuff from
http://keithp.com/fonts/, AFAIK it's not available in a Debian package
yet.
Ah, that stuff.
I've
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 11:17:07PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 06:08:56AM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
The TrueType fonts from xfree86-truetype-fonts[1] are in
xfree86-nonfree-truetype[2]. xft[3] contains the new Xft stuff from
http://keithp.com/fonts/, AFAIK
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:28:11PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
I'd rather wait until Keith has given some indication that the code is
stable before I'd even want to consider patching up to it.
Most likely, the best approach is just to get it with the rest of 4.3.0
when that is
Hi,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been watching Keith's commit messages with great interest. It does
look like cool stuff but he's still chasing the bugs out of it.
It's cool stuff, I think so too.
I'd rather wait until Keith has given some
The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
These packages are not included in the 4.2.0 series of debs. Do they
just have different names? Is there some reason we don't include them?
thanks
michael
--
michael
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:59:52PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
These packages are not included in the 4.2.0 series of debs. Do they
just have different names? Is there
13 matches
Mail list logo
