Several New features and fixes.
If you have previously installed all you need is the exe.
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
(We are getting rain and ice so if you cannot get to the site the power
lines may be down.)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Hold on just a minute. I forgot to do something.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4
Several New features and
Is Spam Review updated since last night when I downloaded??
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4
Hold
It's new this morning but please wait a few more minutes. v1.0.4 has a
major bug in it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Sorry!! Thats what I get trying to remove a couple of untested features
before I distribute.
Several New features and fixes.
If you have previously installed all you need is spamreview.exe.
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
(We are getting rain and ice so if you cannot get to the site the
Hi,
This little program has saved me so much time over the past few
days...what used to take an hours now takes minutes...reviewed all the
spam being held in about 3 minutes this morning...
This worth paying for.
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Hi,
That I do anyway. The good book says that a workman is worth his hire.
It's a nice donation on your part, and usually there is no free ride.
If ever need a hand with some, I'll help if I can.
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Wednesday,
Yes. Can you also build a your a @#$($## for sending me this stupid
SPAM feature?!!! :-))
Love the app!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question on Wednesday 9:38:23 AM
Actually, the next most useful feature for me would
be to take the real sender and add-to-kill.lst function.
Then if you consistently see an abuser, you just add his
address to Imails kill file...
Yes, actually, I would love to be able to just forward/redirect the message
to my SPAMCOP mailbox. I currently do that automatically with Declude for
Weight 20 and above.
Then SPAMCOPY will figure out who REALLY is to notify - because sending it
back to the originator in 99 out of 100 times
Hi,
Spamreview is now correctly displaying the message body in the Message
Body window.
What do I need to do the the declude config to have the correct info
display in the Junk Mail Warnings: window?
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Wednesday,
In the new version v1.0.5 or a prior version?
If you have upgraded this morning to v1.0.5 please email the the Q and D
file for an email that has this problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet
Sent: Wednesday, January
Roger.
Where do you ad this line?
Bennie
This line gives me the 'real' sender and I'd love to kill.lst
some of these if they are clearly doing only spamming...:
XINHEADER X-Note: SMTP Real-From: %MAILFROM%
I do not see an immediate need to notify senders of bad mail.
--
Hi,
I think this is because there needs to be warnings in the declude config
files ?? Which I don't believe I have.
I'm using 1.05.
I've never had anything display in that window.
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Wednesday, January 30,
This thing is great! One nitpicky little thing... any way the different
window sections could be resizable? I've got a few thousand emails
in my spam directory and the scrollbar is tiny. I'd like to see more of
the list at-a-glance.
Keep up the good work :-)
Douglas
- Original Message
Not in version 1.0.5. You should not need warnings. It works best if I can
review an email.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re[4]:
I second this requested feature about adding to the Kill List. Great
Idea!
Also, I like the idea of sending to Spam Cop vs. the sender because will
surely have a lot of bounces.
Also, I think this is great you wrote the app and will not mind sending
a donation to you. Keep up the great job.
Hi,
registars.com has been absorbed by verisign (network solutions)
Any suggestions for alternate registrars?
Sheesh...can't believe I didn't notice the full implications of that before today...
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
---
[This E-mail
I was muddling through the MyParty e-mails this morning that were
caught by Declude and I though your program might possible used for this
(with a little tweaking).
Changes I see that could be made would be that the temp store-to
directory would be c:\imail\spool\virus
and take out the HTML body
I have to ask the way too obvious...all this goes in the
$default$.junkmail file?
That depends.
The test definitions (WEIGHT10 weight x x ...) go in the global.cfg file.
The actions for outgoing mail also go in the global.cfg file.
The actions for incoming mail will go in the
No, that is is good idea. Actually, that is the feature I tried to back out
in v1.0.4 that caused problems. The Virus feature will be in the next
release just as you described.
MyParty?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Champaign Park
Looks like they are up and running again.
John Tolmachoff
Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Bulkregister.com
We have had a lot luck with them.
John Tolmachoff
Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
FYI, we have just released Declude v1.35a, which takes care of an issue
with 1.35 where certain Declude Virus features could be turned off (such as
the BANCLSID option). Anyone who downloaded v1.35 should download 1.35a.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
MyParty?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.35 released on Wednesday 10:41:02 AM
WEIGHT10HOLDX-RBL-Warning: %TESTSFAILED%.
We've never seen the WEIGHT10 appear in the header, only
WEIGHT20, etc. I just realized these are all HOLD, so I
guess I need duplicate
Kudos to Tom! Wonderful tool.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Watchman
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Thanks Tom, Spam Review is
I put this in global.cfg:
XINHEADER X-Note: Tests failed: %testsfailed%
and I get lines like these in my awesome new Spam Review Message Header box:
X-Note: Tests failed: SPAMCOP2, BADHEADERS, SPAMHEADERS, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT18,
WEIGHT182
I'm having trouble getting any work done, what with
X-RBL-Warning: This E-mail failed the following tests: [Unknown Var]
Either you are using an older version of Declude JunkMail (before 1.35), or
you typed the variable name incorrectly (it should be %TESTSFAILED%,
without the quotes).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was
Scott:
Declude reports missing Message ID header - which is being challenged by
the sender's IT folks. When I look at the header - I DO see one:
From: Zone Perfect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: *** disguised ***
Subject: A New Year In The Zone
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:07:27 -0500
Message-ID: [EMAIL
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Did i miss
I am running Declude JunkMail 1.35.. Installed it yesterday... need to get
the 1.35a :)
You can type Declude -diag from a command prompt; the first line will
display the version number, to make sure that you actually have 1.35.
and here is what i have typed
WEIGHT10WARN
Declude reports missing Message ID header - which is being challenged by
the sender's IT folks. When I look at the header - I DO see one:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMail will add the Message-ID: header if it was not present. That's the
format of IMail's Message-ID: header, so it looks
That does look correct; my guess is that you actually have 1.34.
-Scott
Here is what show up
C:\Documents and Settings\AdministratorJ:\IMAIL\Declude\Declude.exe -diag
Diagnostics ON (Declude v1.35).
Declude JunkMail: Not installed (no
Hmmm. I updated my Global.Cfg and I think there is a bug.
Note that the actions listed in the global.cfg file only affect outgoing
mail. For incoming mail, you need to make the change in the
$default$.JunkMail file.
WEIGHT10WARNX-RBL-Warning: %TESTSFAILED%.
If this is in the
nope! that doesn't work, tells me your not authorized to view that page.
Nice try anyway.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
That does look correct; my guess is that you actually have 1.34.
Here is what show up
C:\Documents and Settings\AdministratorJ:\IMAIL\Declude\Declude.exe -diag
Diagnostics ON (Declude v1.35).
The problem is that you have installed the new version in the
\IMail\Declude\ directory; it
Sorry...
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
I don't know who RE-ORDERS the message headers - but I had SENT the complete
headers as they appeared in Outlook!?
Ah, that's Outlook for you!
Are you saying, the order that we are seeing in the mail client is NOT
the order in
which the headers were received?
That's what I'm guessing.
I
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.35 released on Wednesday 12:35:49 PM
Thanks, I keep forgetting this.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
R If this is in the $default$.JunkMail file, are you seeing any warning
R headers, and if so, what shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.35 released
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:53:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
just downloaded the declude.exe file from the webpage and when i do
the -diag it still shows 1.35 not 1.35a
Bennie
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject:
just downloaded the declude.exe file from the webpage and when i do
the -diag it still shows 1.35 not 1.35a
Make sure that you run it from the same directory that you downloaded it
to. It should be in the \IMail\ directory.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
Why did these get a Freemail weight of 4?
01/30/2002 15:24:40 Q6475032 BADHEADERS:4 SPAMHEADERS:4 nFREEMAIL:4
. Total weight = 12
Note that it's nFREEMAIL -- do you have two different tests listed?
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
. I can not download 135a... on the website it is still 135
It's listed on the website as 1.35. We've found that too many people
interpret version numbers so widely, that it's often easiest to do
something like this, where we're just going to refer to both versions as
1.35. The Declude
No, Scott. What I sent you is the ONLY freemail test I have listed. I
can zip up and send you my config files, if you like.
Yes, that would be very helpful.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
Let's talk about the IMail kill.lst file for just a minute.
Some of you suggested that you wanted to add from email addresses to the
kill.lst file from SpamReview. I like this idea and am working on it.
My question is...
How do you want it to work?
Do you want a button to do it?
Do you want
I would prefer a separate button. Because when I delete something I don't
necessarily want to kill the address. But when I kill the address I would
probably want to delete the message.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
I use the D file for the list so I think I have the right email address.
Is this correct Scott?
This was my thought. If you delete the email you are saying it is spam.
Why would you not want to add it to the kill.lst file? However, it has
already been noted that you might want to change it
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File on Wednesday 6:56:42 PM
I always thought you must recycle the SMTP for any change
in Imail, rules.ima, kill.lst, etc. I think this may be
because some of these settings are held in memory for speed.
Tom,
I would want 2 separate button options.
1. Button to the delete Kill list.
2. Button to the Delete folder only.
Not 100% for sure but a warning in the documentation about having the
%MAILFROM% variable in your header as Scott was stating in a previous
post. Does this address the
I received an empty email that failed the badheaders test due to no FROM
address. It came from the Imail list. Did you see the same?
No, but I have seen several blank E-mails come from the IMail list before.
Just thought I would ask, because we are running 135a and I haven't seen
an empty
What does ADULT test against?
Is there a words / phrases file somewhere we can edit?
It scans the E-mail for certain keywords, each assigned a weight, and if a
certain weight is reached, the test is triggered. There is no way to
change the way that it works.
-Scott
I do not know about version 7 of Imail but I do know that you have stop and restart
the SMTP process in earlier versions for any additions to the control access list and
I always assumed the same held true for the kill.lst.
CJS
-- Original Message --
It seems to me that SpamCop black-lists any servers that reported spam comes
from.
I stopped using spamcop because I found them black listing AOL servers and
then mail from AOL customers is rejected. The spam may come from AOL
servers, and one could argue that AOL should do more to stop the
55 matches
Mail list logo
