[Declude.JunkMail] Newbie questions:

2002-07-12 Thread John Weiner
After reading the archives (thanks all!) for most of the afternoon, I'm still on the fence with what to expect from Declude.  I run an ISP that gets over 100k emails inbound a day, and the hardware handles it nicely.   SMTP normally never claims more than 20% of available cpus for both in an

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist for only one domain?

2002-07-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I have a customer that wants to get mail from a certain Spammer. > >How can I whitelist that address just for one domain and not for all >of our domains/customers? > >The Per Domain configuration looks like it continues to use the one >global.cfg which is where the white list is located, but a c

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist for only one domain?

2002-07-12 Thread Don Brown
I have a customer that wants to get mail from a certain Spammer. How can I whitelist that address just for one domain and not for all of our domains/customers? The Per Domain configuration looks like it continues to use the one global.cfg which is where the white list is located, but a change th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New to the list

2002-07-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/ And welcome. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Weiner Sent: Friday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New to the list

2002-07-12 Thread Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/maillist.html Frederick P. Squib, Jr. Network Administrator Citizens Internet Services http://www.wpa.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Weiner Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1

[Declude.JunkMail] New to the list

2002-07-12 Thread John Weiner
Is there an archive of earlier lists available for perusal or download? Thanks, John --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], an

[Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Interesting article on CNET about Spam blacklists

2002-07-12 Thread Jay A. Caplan
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-943337.html?tag=fd_lede --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console

2002-07-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Someone mentioned earlier that there was a way to invoke declude to >spawn a console in order to see what's happening in real time. Is this >correct and how do you invoke this? The Declude Console was designed primarily for use with Declude Hijack, but can be used with the other Declude progr

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Negative Weight

2002-07-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
>In assigning negative weight should we assign the domain as it appears >in the log? First, I should clarify that there are two meanings of "negative weight". One is the weight that is added to an E-mail when the E-mail does NOT fail a spam test (which is almost always 0). The other is a sta

[Declude.JunkMail] Console

2002-07-12 Thread Darrell LaRock
Someone mentioned earlier that there was a way to invoke declude to spawn a console in order to see what's happening in real time. Is this correct and how do you invoke this? Darrell --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came fro

[Declude.JunkMail] Negative Weight

2002-07-12 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; In assigning negative weight should we assign the domain as it appears in the log? Almost all newsletters from Microsoft are assigned a warning for REVDNS. So should we assign a negative 5 weigth to: Microsoft.com Or: Newsletters.Microsoft.com Or: delivery.pens.microsoft.com This is also t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I spammed myself again!

2002-07-12 Thread John Shacklett
My profound apologies to one and all. I'm not having a good morning [I had an afternoon of hooky planned for the golf course, and it's not going to happen after all], so I'm making bad decisions. I could send the headers, but here are two lines from the declude log that are more to the point: 07

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I spammed myself again!

2002-07-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I thought I had a handle on all this, but this message from Timothy got >snagged by my MYFILTER filter test, which is looking for "Saf-E Mail" in the >body and applying punitive weights That's one of the major disadvantages to filtering -- you often can't receive E-mail referring to the E-mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help!?

2002-07-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Can someone help me with this please? 205.214.199.131 is a sendmail machine >I have rigged to help out Imail with deliveries so it has a secondary MX. >People send mail to xxx from xxx which is obviously forged and the only >proof is the X-auth warning from my secondary MX. Can anyone see any wa

[Declude.JunkMail] Help!?

2002-07-12 Thread Craig Gittens
Can someone help me with this please? 205.214.199.131 is a sendmail machine I have rigged to help out Imail with deliveries so it has a secondary MX. People send mail to xxx from xxx which is obviously forged and the only proof is the X-auth warning from my secondary MX. Can anyone see any way of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I spammed myself again!

2002-07-12 Thread John Shacklett
I thought I had a handle on all this, but this message from Timothy got snagged by my MYFILTER filter test, which is looking for "Saf-E Mail" in the body and applying punitive weights, but I received a message in my own personal Inbox overnight from Saf-E which didn't trip the word filter, or HELO