I have this email address blocked
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yet it is still getting passed my Declude Scanner. Can anyone help with this?
Received: from postoffice.inreach.com [209.142.2.45] by mail.nfti.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A3B91450046; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:27:05 -0400
Received: from
---
Steven Cmajdalka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Graphics Group
2800 Taylor St
Dallas, TX 75226
---
Here is one to add to your kill list.
--
@forum.dk ID-20020812
I have this email address blocked
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yet it is still getting passed my Declude Scanner. Can anyone help with this?
Where is it blocked? In a sender blacklist (fromfile)? Are other
blocked E-mail addresses getting blocked?
Do you have any whitelists that would allow the
It's in the sender blacklist... and it's is not in my whitelist.
greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this one get
Thanks for the Utility Scott MacLean !!, I set it up this AM Works great.
Ed McNichols, MCP
Archiventure, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.archiventure.net
Tel. 570.253.1986
Fax. 570.253.4343
-Original
It's in the sender blacklist...
Is the sender blacklist set up properly (are other blacklisted
domains/addresses working properly)? What does the line look like in your
sender blacklist file?
and it's is not in my whitelist.
Do you have any whitelist entries? Often, mistakes are made
I've been curious about how messages show up in the Declude Console as they stream
through.
In the top third of the console window messages are labeled as I, O, IS, OS, IV, or OV
(I assume these standing for incoming/outgoing, SPAM, and Virus).
Here's my question:
If a message shows up as IS
I've been curious about how messages show up in the Declude Console as
they stream through.
In the top third of the console window messages are labeled as I, O, IS,
OS, IV, or OV (I assume these standing for incoming/outgoing, SPAM, and
Virus).
That is correct.
Here's my question:
If a
Request to be able to view the console via terminal services.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
Request to be able to view the console via terminal services.
As soon as we find out why Microsoft won't display the console via terminal
services, we'll do our best to take care of that request. :)
The problem is that there doesn't seem to be any logical reason why it does
not display.
I just got an idea, I will try it and report.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 10:36
From what I have read, in Win2k terminal services cannot connect to the
console session, however the next release of server will include this
capability, so will have remote control rather than a mere terminal. Many
programs have the same issue since the default action for a service that
Messages originating from a mailto script from one of our webservers are failing the
spamheaders and badheaders tests.
Here's what I get from Declude's site:
Code: c020020c. The E-mail failed the BADHEADERS and SPAMHEADERS tests.
This E-mail has a bogus Date: header.
Here's the full header
Messages originating from a mailto script from one of our webservers are
failing the spamheaders and badheaders tests.
That's fairly common -- huge numbers of web scripts are out there that
don't follow the standard SMTP rules.
Here's the full header info from the message (with the email
Note that there is no Date: or Message-ID: header (I removed the headers
that were added by Declude and IMail). The lack of a Date: header breaks
RFC-compliancy (and causes much of the E-mail to get lost). The missing
Message-ID: header is legal, but only allowed under certain
http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stic.Net
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:21 PM
To:
Here is one to add to your kill list.
--
@forum.dk ID-20020812-000319
--
Although I can not read the web site language, it appears
to be a legitimate Mail Service. So I would
I liked this idea so much (of a downloadable spam domain file)
that I wrote a small utility that automatically downloaded the
full list, incorporated it into my own list and wrote out a
combined list. Anyone who wants to use it is welcome:
At 04:36 PM 8/12/2002, Tom wrote:
I liked this idea so much (of
a downloadable spam domain file)
that I wrote a small utility that automatically downloaded the
full list, incorporated it into my own list and wrote out a
combined list. Anyone who wants to use it is welcome:
Is it correct that if the filter file has
subject 1contains
body 1contains
and the global.cfg file has ...\filter.txt x 1 0
That the total of a failed test would be 3
In other words each test section failed in the filter.txt file will count
20 matches
Mail list logo
