Another idea for monitoring your Declude version is putting the
%VERSION% Inserts the version of Declude that is running
into your Global file. Not only do you see in real time what you have, but you can
see which messages made the cut when you upgraded and know the upgrade went
I'm having trouble with email addresses that are IMail alias names. It
seems that spam is detected (gets flagged in the internal email headers),
but no action is taken.
As you probably know, all E-mail will be scanned by default. So if you
don't have any per-user or per-domain settings,
Is there a way to create a REDIRECT statement that will apply to all users
in a particular domain without having to list each individual user?
No. The REDIRECT statement was designed specifically as a way to make it
easier to set up per-user settings.
For what you are doing, per-domain
X-RBL-Warning: MAILFROM: Domain web0.bsc.net has no MX/A records.
Just noticed in cleaning up DNS while back that i accidentally erased the A
record for my web servers official name.
( I have several A records point to it, and never use the above name ).
I've already fixed DNS, updated serial
We're getting further off-topic for the Declude list I think.
Apologies again.
| The personal messages are the most difficult and becoming
| worse. They are random and infrequent. They are often among
| the most important messages. Individuals have an
| unbelievable number of private
X-RBL-Warning: MAILFROM: Domain web0.bsc.net has no MX/A records.
Just noticed in cleaning up DNS while back that i accidentally erased the A
record for my web servers official name.
( I have several A records point to it, and never use the above name ).
I've already fixed DNS, updated serial
Does the DNS engine in Declude cache failed lookups?
if so what do I need to do for it to refresh, or what is the time
period
before it tries again? I could reboot, but this *is* a mail server
we're
talking about :)
I am not sure about a Declude cache, but DNS servers on the Internet may
take a
Thought I had IMAIL using my main 2 dns servers when in reality its using 2
of my caching servers. By the time I went to check them they had already
updated.
I'm just too impatient during debugging
Thanks again
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I'm just too impatient during debugging
So am I.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
Hi folks,
Not sure if this is common knowledge, but I just heard about this and it really
digusts me.
There is a relatively new technology being used in the e-mail marketing industry
called appending. This is technology that allows a company to send a list of
customers to a service bureau
Hi all,
I'm receiving false positives from some legitimate lists I belong to.
For example, the Macromedia Partners Only newsletter fails the
HELOBOGUS and REVDNS tests. Should I bother to alert them or are these
failures typical of bulk mailing apps that will likely not be corrected?
Any input
I'm receiving false positives from some legitimate lists I belong to.
For example, the Macromedia Partners Only newsletter fails the
HELOBOGUS and REVDNS tests. Should I bother to alert them or are these
failures typical of bulk mailing apps that will likely not be corrected?
The REVDNS test
Thank you, Scott. I'll let 'em know.
Dave
R. Scott Perry wrote:
I'm receiving false positives from some legitimate lists I belong to.
For example, the Macromedia Partners Only newsletter fails the
HELOBOGUS and REVDNS tests. Should I bother to alert them or are these
failures typical of
Scott,
We've seen Klez.E, Klez.H and now Bugbear falsifying from addresses. How
long before Declude will give you the option to have it use the domain name
from the headers and add abuse@ in front of the actual originating sending
mail server, rather than relying on the from address?
DNS Reports at:
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=xidix.com
claims:
WARNING: One or more of your mailservers does not accept mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailservers are expected by RFC2142 to accept mail to
abuse.
mail.speakeasy.net's abuse response:
RCPT TO: [EMAIL
I second that. I got a nasty note from a guy today about the
automated email sent from my Declude (it was the result of a
Bugbear infected email).
I could disable the warnings, but have actually had ISP's send
Thank You's in some cases.
Wes Harper
Network Administrator
Pioneer Telephone
[This would best be discussed in the Declude Virus mailing list]
We've seen Klez.E, Klez.H and now Bugbear falsifying from addresses. How
long before Declude will give you the option to have it use the domain name
from the headers and add abuse@ in front of the actual originating sending
mail
DNS Reports at:
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=xidix.com
claims:
WARNING: One or more of your mailservers does not accept mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailservers are expected by RFC2142 to accept mail to
abuse.
mail.speakeasy.net's abuse response:
RCPT TO: [EMAIL
That wouldnt be a very good feature for innocent guys like me who would
recieve the abuse messages. The amount of traffic those types of viruses can
generate would be a nightmare and might force me to block the notifying
server.. The infected users usually find out rather quickly that they are
Hi,
well, that's what IMails Anti-Virus solution would accomplish. Imail
AntiVirus supposedly rejects infected messages DURING the ONGOING SMTP
conversation BEFORE it is accepted. The result would be a bounce message
from the SENDING mail server. Any questions regarding that bounce message
I second that. I got a nasty note from a guy today about the
automated email sent from my Declude (it was the result of a
Bugbear infected email).
I could disable the warnings, but have actually had ISP's send
Thank You's in some cases.
Note that recent (post-Klez) versions of Declude Virus
well, that's what IMails Anti-Virus solution would accomplish.
Nope. :)
Imail AntiVirus supposedly rejects infected messages DURING the ONGOING SMTP
conversation BEFORE it is accepted.
I believe that is usually the case.
The result would be a bounce message from the SENDING mail server.
I'm still confused about this...
I have a domain, xidix.com, and it has a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account and an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] account. If someone sends email to either of those
addresses, they will not be rejected. What else do I need to setup to be
RFC compliant?
The problem is that if they
Hi all,
I'm curious to know how other Declude JunkMail users are configuring their
software. What are your favorite tweaks to the default rules and actions? Are
sender blacklists worth the effort? Are commercial subscriptions (MAPS, etc.)
worth the expense?
Perhaps more importantly, is there
ps. I'm a new Declude JunkMail user. Where can I get input on popular
tests/actions other users are employing and their effectiveness? Are
any commercial lists worth the expense? Thank you!
If you look through the archives, you will find real life examples of
what some people are doing.
| Declude probably doesn't need to do anything special - spam
| is still spam, but this really bothers me that spam
| technologies like this are starting to become mainstream --
| Maybe we really do need laws regulating spam as a law would
| quickly stop all these for-profit, but easily
David,
Tuesday, October 8, 2002 you wrote:
DD What are your favorite tweaks to the default rules and actions?
Employ a weight system. I use a simple system with only two
weights but others have more complex systems. This will take some
effort depending upon your particular
27 matches
Mail list logo
