At 08:15 PM 10/24/02, you wrote:
Thats correct...It reads it each time a message is received. We plan to work on a
similar tool using ASP here in the next month or two.
Bill
ASP?arg... just kiddin'
I'll do the CF thingy
sounds like a good test..I like
We're developing an ASP solution for this as well, initially just
modifying the users $default$.junkmail file and providing WARN/SUBJECT
changes initially, then progressing onto WEIGHT change etc. later. If we
offer too much at first otherwise we make a rod for our own back and
drown in client
Hi;
I thought this could be of interest, in case you don't get the warnings
from Sophos.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: Sophos Alert System [mailto:emergency-return;lists.sophos.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sophos advises on
Recap - In three days, I've only had one message trip the HELOBOGUS test.
Here's the recap:
1) I'm catching lots of spam with other tests
2) Scott checked the header of a message (see posting at Thu 10/24/2002 2:17
PM) and didn't note any problems
New information:
1) I'm running Declude 1.60
2)
Ok, I need to whitelist a sender within our domain 2khiway, how do I do
this? I looked at the manual, but it shows NO after the line that mentions
it, it's not allowed?
What I was going to do, in global.cfg, in outgoing section or does it
matter?
WHITELIST FROM[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is this
Recap - In three days, I've only had one message trip the HELOBOGUS test.
Here's the recap:
1) I'm catching lots of spam with other tests
2) Scott checked the header of a message (see posting at Thu 10/24/2002 2:17
PM) and didn't note any problems
New information:
1) I'm running Declude 1.60
Ok, I need to whitelist a sender within our domain 2khiway, how do I do
this? I looked at the manual, but it shows NO after the line that mentions
it, it's not allowed?
Hmm... do you mean NOTE:?
What I was going to do, in global.cfg, in outgoing section or does it
matter?
WHITELIST FROM
Ok, Sounds like everyone is building a tool of some sort, might no hurt to
get some collaboration going. I recently posted a link to a spam reviewing
ASP app, and I am working on a way to modify the users rules files to filter
based on a standard declude config. If any ASP developers want a look
Hmm... do you mean NOTE:?
just no. The section Whitelist/Blacklist Reference, the last portion points
to ALLOWED. So it's yes or no.
That is correct (it can go anywhere in the global.cfg file).
ok.
This will also allow quite a bit of spam to be delivered to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since many
just no. The section Whitelist/Blacklist Reference, the last portion points
to ALLOWED. So it's yes or no.
Ah, that's the Comments Allowed column. That just means that you can't
have comments on that whitelist line.
This will also allow quite a bit of spam to be delivered to
[EMAIL
I have noticed that many spammers in recent months have begun to use the
recipients email as the senders email.
Yes, I've commented on it twice today. :)
Can this be trapped by the current tests or should I request a new test to
cover this?
The only legitimate mail that would pass this
Be careful if you do this...
A lot of people actually send messages to others as BCC and then put
themselves in To in order to make sure it has gone out.
We see a lot of that.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com] On
Be careful if you do this...
A lot of people actually send messages to others as BCC and then put
themselves in To in order to make sure it has gone out.
We see a lot of that.
I too see that.
One of our largest clients will often send out excess inventory lists to
several people. As those
Have these people never heard of the sent items folder? I know people do
this a lot, but it is not necessary (IMHO) and generates extra mail traffic.
We have tried very hard to teach our people to use the sent items so we
don't have a huge problem with marking these as spam.
$.02
This method of
Scott,
When I reviewed the debug log, I found that I was actually running v1.53 - I
had never copied 1.60 to the \IMail folder (I had just copied it to
\Imail\Declude).
I'm going to let it run over the weekend and then if it isn't looking right,
I'll capture a debug log and send it to you.
If it
Have these people never heard of the sent items folder?
What about when I am working at a client and check my e-mail via web mail?
If I have to respond to something, I would want a copy of it in my sent mail
in my Outlook, so I BCC myself and when I get back to the office, I move the
copy into
Oh yeah I agree with everyone's opinions on this. One of our customers BCCs
himself ALL the time, as well as his wife in the same room. I don't know why
people can't look into the sent box.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
This will also allow quite a bit of spam to be delivered to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since many spammers now use the recipient's address as
the sender's address.
So, does can Declude filter based on X-Declude sender? or does it just
recognise the From sender? for when the from changes but the X
I normally bcc everyone with no-one in the TO address when I'm forwarding
anything, just so everyone doesn't have to wade through all the names to get
to the information. I've seen many times where when there is nothing in the
TO line, our mail server must be adding my name as the TO. Won't
So, does can Declude filter based on X-Declude sender?
The X-Declude-Sender: header lists the return address of the E-mail, which
you can filter on (either with a fromfile test type (sender blacklist),
or with a filter). Both work based on the return address, not the From:
header.
When I reviewed the debug log, I found that I was actually running v1.53 - I
had never copied 1.60 to the \IMail folder (I had just copied it to
\Imail\Declude).
I had thought of double-checking that, but since an E-mail had failed the
test, I figured you were using 1.60. :)
I'm going to
I sometimes send messages to multiple recipients as
BCCswith myself as TO. I think that's prefereable to putting all the
recipients as TO. Doesn't OE refuse to send if TO is blank? Or does
it just pop up a warning, but will send anyway after OKing the warning -- I've
never left TO blank, so
himself ALL the time, as well as his wife in the same room. I don't know
why
people can't look into the sent box.
Because if you use IMAP and Outlook express, and send from one machine, the
mail won't appear in the sent folder on another machine.
Maybe I'm a weirdo or something, but I send
The owner of my company also has another company in the office, and they all
send out as the group alias and CC the group alias so everyone has a
complete copy of communications with customers. No one can say I didn't
know what he said to the customer.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original
I recently downloaded the declude log test analyzer and was wondering how
you take it out of demo mode. I checked the online documentation and it says
that you can't register it until it is out of beta version. Has anybody been
able to use of its functions, such as sending reports while it is
I need a little help:
Does JM scan your own domain outgoing mail? I would like to stop the
jdbgmgr.exe hoax emails. i thought this would work but it doesn't.
I set this up:
Global.cfg:
VirusHoax filter c:\Imail\Declude\virhoax.txtx 0 0
$default$.junkmail:
Does JM scan your own domain outgoing mail?
Declude JunkMail Pro will scan outgoing mail (using the outgoing actions
from the global.cfg file).
I would like to stop the jdbgmgr.exe hoax emails. i thought this would
work but it doesn't.
I set this up:
Global.cfg:
VirusHoax filter
It looks like the original question I posted got changed when it was relied
to with a totally different question. Does anybody know how to take the
Declude log test analyzer out of demo mode without registering it? Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks like the original question I posted got changed when it was relied
to with a totally different question. Does anybody know how to take the
Declude log test analyzer out of demo mode without registering it? Thanks
There are a number of third party tools at http://www.declude.com/tools
The one I was referring to was DELOG
http://www.imagefxonline.net/apps/delog/, which analyzes the declude
junkmail log files. I downloaded it but can't use it's full functionality in
beta mode, but can't register it because it is in beta mode. It was
mentioned in here so I was wondering if anybody
I recently downloaded the declude log test analyzer and was wondering how
you take it out of demo mode. I checked the online documentation
and it says that you can't register it until it is out of beta version.
Has anybody been able to use of its functions, such as sending reports
while
Actually I haven't been able to get the t_rep: LOG option to work either.
This option would write a report to the file delmmdd.log in the same
location as the declude log files. I guess similar to creating a batch file,
except it would use the date of the log file as its name. Was this feature
Actually I haven't been able to get the t_rep: LOG option to work either.
This option would write a report to the file delmmdd.log in the same
location as the declude log files. I guess similar to creating a
batch file, except it would use the date of the log file as its name.
Was this
Thanks for all your help and I guess I'll wait until they are reinvented but
in the meantime I'll still use Delog as it is a useful utility.
~~~
Karl Hentschel
Network Administrator
A+, Network+, MCP
~~~
Peninsula Community Federal Credit
Thanks for all your help and I guess I'll wait until they are
reinvented but in the meantime I'll still use Delog as it is
a useful utility.
Sorry for the inconvenience, however, like we said before Delog
was written in a language that is no longer supported and has
too many problems for
I just remembered! There is another Declude log analyzer someone
wrote for NT. I have the zip files if anyone needs them or
you can look at the mail archives for a download link.
Usage version 1.2
By Jeff Pitoniak
[ Description:
I am interested in this program if it will work on Win2000 iMail 7.13 and
Declude 1.61 Beta
John
- Original Message -
From: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude log test analyzer
I just remembered!
I am interested in this program if it will work on Win2000 iMail 7.13 and
Declude 1.61 Beta
I don't know, it's not mine and I have never tested it.
However, I will e-mail it to you.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
I am interested in that program. Thanks.
~~~
Karl Hentschel
Network Administrator
A+, Network+, MCP
~~~
Peninsula Community Federal Credit Union
http://www.pcfcu.org
(800) 426-1601 Ext. 3070
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
39 matches
Mail list logo
