>> If you feel that for some reason I am wrong for placing them into the
list then I would like to here it. I am only human and un-like a computer I
do make mistakes and unlike a computer I try to rectify them.
I hope Spews is listening...
Sorry i just could not resist...
eddie :)
---
[This E-
A clarification on this post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@;declude.com/msg04189.html
Having Declude Standard, I can only WHITELIST TO abuse or postmaster,
correct?
That is correct.
Is there another way to whitelist a to address?
Yes -- by upgrading to Declude JunkMail Pro
A clarification on this post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@;declude.com/msg04189.html
Having Declude Standard, I can only WHITELIST TO abuse or postmaster,
correct?
Is there another way to whitelist a to address?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSo
I want to thank everyone who requested a beta copy of CYBERsitter NoXMail.
There were quite a few requests and we received a lot of positive feedback and
a couple of good suggestions.
One user requested that we set up a mailing list so that beta users can ask
questions, and also so that I can sen
> I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put
> into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help
guard
> against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to
thank
> you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as
> this f
>You know what is even more laughable is that I am the
>one who posted the list and it got caught by my own
>spam traps.
At least we all know it works. :))
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was s
> LOL
You know what is even more laughable is that I am the
one who posted the list and it got caught by my own
spam traps.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> Any particular reason you are blocking o u t p o s t.com?
Although I am blocking it, does not mean you have to.
I don't remember every reason for each site added to
the list, however, more than likely they were sending
us junk mail without permission. If you feel that for
some reason I am wron
> I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put
> into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help guard
> against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to thank
> you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as
> thi
>> @boing.azoogle.com
> curious, but would having .azoogle be better than boing.azoogle? if they
> change boing to boing2 the mail would get through correct?
I also have .azoogle.com listed. This will catch almost anything from them
except for @azoogle.com - Using both these methods will allo
LOL
It got caught by CYBERsitter too.
Look at the list of the domains.
The body filters picked up on words in the list of domain names.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Are the messages from this particular thread getting caught by sniffer for
everyone else? How does sniffer work and why is it catching this email?
Something with the wide variety of domains listed?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.c
I've just upgraded to 1.62 and now I'm attempting to configure the country
test.
I've downloaded the dat file from
http://www.declude.com/release/162/all_list.dat
and placed it in the Declude folder.
Are you sure that it is located in the declude folder and named correctly
(\IMail\Declude\all_
Thanks John and Terry. I think I have a very good plan of attack. Both of
your replies were very insightful.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com] On Behalf Of Smart Business
Lists
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:39 AM
To:
Tom,
I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put
into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help guard
against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to thank
you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as
this fo
I've just upgraded to 1.62 and now I'm attempting to configure the country
test.
I've downloaded the dat file from
http://www.declude.com/release/162/all_list.dat
and placed it in the Declude folder.
In global.cfg I have:
XINHEADER X-Country-Chain: %COUNTRYCHAIN%
and
COUNTRY filter C:\IMail
This is a message that arrives from the EzMTS mailserver to IMail/Declude.
Ah, I see. It probably is a problem with EzMTS, where the E-mail headers
and the body can't be distinguished.
Do you happen to have a sample of one of these E-mails in an IMail .mbx
file? That would be the best way
Scott
This is a message that arrives from the EzMTS mailserver to IMail/Declude.
David
>
> >I have a customer that uses EzMTS, a Windows freeware
> mailserver. When ever
> >a message goes through that server and Declude all the Xheaders added by
> >Declude show up in the body of the mail. Can
Hello Tom -
I'm a recent addition to the Declude group and I don't usually endorse
products or go out of my way to provide testimonials but... I think it's
worthwhile to continue your trial. Most of the problems I've encountered
have been, well, self-inflicted in nature. I've picked up a lot of
> found: 26 ID-20021112-000700 @boing.azoogle.com
curious, but would having .azoogle be better than boing.azoogle? if they
change boing to boing2 the mail would get through correct?
That's the problem I have on deciding this stuff, if you say .azoogle alone,
ANYTHING from azoogle will be b
Great! Do you think you can get it to work on aliases rather than just
intended recipients like you mentioned?
Yes, in the next release, the ALLRECIPS filter option will work on both the
intended recipient and actual recipient, so you won't have to have the
account created on the server.
I appreciate the offer. I put it forth to my Boss and the other Tech on
this project. I don't think that they should give up on this yet...but they
think otherwise. If I can manage to convince them to go forward, I will
take you up on your offer.
If, in fact, they do choose to give it another sh
Great! Do you think you can get it to work on aliases rather than just
intended recipients like you mentioned?
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:15 PM
> To: [EM
We thought about that, but our users don't want it.. Period... (So they
say)
-Russ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jcochran@;naplesgov.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence
> Tha
24 matches
Mail list logo