Does anyone check the charset of a email?
We are receiving a bunch of korean emails from hotmail and yahoo, I was
wondering if anyone has setup a filter isolating emails by charsets?
Thanks,
Eddie :)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-
> FYI, just in case Scott does take some time off,
> (cough cough) I will be around. (As if that would actually help.)
As am I. Though, like John said, don't know how much this will help.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
I caught a bug in rules file processing. It only affected the
setRuleFile function for local rules, remote rules (which is how I am
set up) has no known issues. The new version has been posted.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL P
FYI, just in case Scott does take some time off, (cough cough) I will be
around. (As if that would actually help.)
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
Message Sniffer now has a new experimental rule group "Scumware
Greetings" that contains all of the domains mentioned in the following
message. The new rulesets for this have been published. Version 2 users
will see symbol 62 for this group.
If anybody has a reliable source for the growing list we
Scott said:
>You can add "WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "WHITELIST TO
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to the \IMail\Declude\Global.cfg file to whitelist
>E-mail to those domains (even if you are not running the Pro version, you
>can whitelist E-mail to postmaster@ and abuse@ accounts).
And Darrell s
>It has been my findings that most spam that really needs to be deleted
comes from >servers that have neither a postmaster@ or abuse@. Personally, I
feel its a waste of >resources to try and bounce it back to those addresses.
If they have no A / MX >record and are on a blacklists, they need to be
c
Title: Message
I think
that misses the point of this thread: If I'm bouncing [or rejecting outright]
mail from a host or domain, then they have no appeal recourse unless I can open
up a safe channel for _SOME_ mail to flow through.
On the
other hand, I have abuse@mydomains and postmaster@
Title: Message
It
has been my findings that most spam that really needs to be deleted comes from
servers that have neither a postmaster@ or abuse@. Personally, I feel its a
waste of resources to try and bounce it back to those addresses. If they have no
A / MX record and are on a blackli
Marc,
We actually whitelist the following
addresses
WHITELIST TO postmaster@
WHITELIST TO abuse@
For the mentioned reasons below.
Darrell
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Wednesday,
November
I've been using the delete action on a blacklist test for Junkmail. I
also have a few ip ranges blocked. I was thinking that if anyone with any
brains figured out that they were blocked that maybe they would e-mail
postmaster or abuse. Should I have a separate junkmail file for one or
both
I've been using the
delete action on a blacklist test for Junkmail. I also have a few ip
ranges blocked. I was thinking that if anyone with any brains figured out
that they were blocked that maybe they would e-mail postmaster or abuse.
Should I have a separate junkmail file for one or bot
I have posted a copy of my SpamReview web app for download. It is
sourceware, modify to your needs. I will provide as much support as I
can, but I can't promise a whole lot. It works well from my development
and production servers and I have released it for use to my customers.
The app can be p
oops. Sorry about that guys, fumble fingers caused that. It's back up, but
I've moved it to where I should have put it in the first place to keep it
from being deleted:
http://www.nerosoft.com/Download/KillListGenInst.exe
...and for anyone who has a few minutes to kill, and wants a good laugh:
>The link for the Killlistgenerator.exe is dead. Can someone post this
>file or email it to me?
Here is the master link http://www.nerosoft.com/ perhaps you could
contact them about it.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
>1. created a fromfile test called JUNK
>2. created a JUNKbounce.eml file
>3. set the action of the test to BOUNCE
>4. entered 2 known high volume addresses (that I already block) into my
>junksenders.txt file (i.e. bounce@domain)
>5. created a JUNKbounce.eml file
>
>Just waiting for the onslaught
>For those who have a small enough volume and bounce messages that fail
>your spam tests how do you word your bounce messages.
http://www.imagefxonline.net/apps/delog/bounce.txt
edit it the way you want.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www
I assume that would change it so that if one recipient on a mutilple
recipient email got flagged, you would just remove that one recipient from
the header and the email would still get delivered to the others as opposed
to deleting the enitre email?
That is correct. That is what we are plannin
That would be good. Is the issue the same for filtering using a single text
file as it is for the per-user configuration?
I assume that would change it so that if one recipient on a mutilple
recipient email got flagged, you would just remove that one recipient from
the header and the email would st
>Doesn't this test reduce the weight of any message coming from an Exchange
server regardless of whether or not the message fails BASE64?
No, because the server itself does not publish it's version, only the client
that creates the message does.
For example, I received a postmaster NDR message th
The link for the Killlistgenerator.exe is dead. Can someone
post this file or email it to me?
Thanks in advance.
I~
I~ I I~
)_) )_) )_)
)___))___))___)\
)))_)\\
_III\\\__
-\ Venture Computer /-
^^^ \
on 11/26/02 12:25 PM, John Tolmachoff wrote:
> Here is what I have done as a work around: (JunkMail PRO)
>
> Create a filter test something like this:
>
> WHITEFILTER1 filter D:\imail\declude\whitefilter1.txtx00
>
> Use these two lines in the whitefilter1.txt file:
>
> HEADERS -15
Even thought it has been determined that there is no legit REASON to use
BASE64 encoding in the body, I am finding and increasing use of it.
Most of these are junk, but it has caught a number of legit messages.
Therefore, I have downgraded BASE64 from 15 to 12.
Any one experiencing similar?
Joh
I think that answer that was given before was not possible.
However, I am working on an external program (not me, my programmers) that
will probably do that.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message
>Anyone else doing something similar?
>Comments are welcome
Did you see Darrell's post at 5:50 this morning?
Same comments.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude V
>The problem with SpamCop is that if 2% of the mail from a server is
considered spam by the recipients, it will be listed. If SpamCop would
wise up and include the % in the TXT record, then the mailserver
administrator could choose the percentage to filter on. Most spam is sent
from servers t
I had the same thing happen to me yesterday as well. Got several
complaints from AOL users.
Darrell LaRock
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DSN:Re: [
I know I have asked
this before, I will take notes this time.
How do I Block a IP
that is connecting to my server but still receive emails from a certain email
address?
Jerry
FreundInformation
Systems SupervisorPhoenix Gold Int'l Inc. tel.
503.286.9300 ext. 530fax. 503.978.8531
WWW.PH
Brian,
Wednesday, November 27, 2002 you wrote:
BM> I have noticed this as well. Yesterday Spamcop failed several
BM> legitimate messages from AOL users. Maybe they are not clearing
BM> out the false reports as regularly as they normally do because of
BM> the holiday week.
Part of it is that they
I'm trying an experiment today...
1. created a fromfile test called JUNK
2. created a JUNKbounce.eml file
3. set the action of the test to BOUNCE
4. entered 2 known high volume addresses (that I already block) into my
junksenders.txt file (i.e. bounce@domain)
5. created a JUNKbounce.eml file
Jus
Has any one else noticed an increase in the number of legit companies listed
on SPAMCOP? I have been having to increase my white filter list.
Examples:
Ebay.com
Techrepublic.com
winntmag.com
That's most likely just because more and more recipients of E-mail from
those companies are treating
Hi John,
I have noticed this as well. Yesterday Spamcop failed several legitimate
messages from AOL users. Maybe they are not clearing out the false reports as
regularly as they normally do because of the holiday week.
-Brian
On 11/27/02 6:51am you wrote...
>Has any one else noticed an increas
THANK YOU
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Which Version
>I am running version 1.60 should I be using the beta since its the n
>I am running version 1.60, should I be using the beta since its the newest
version?
If you need a function or fix that has been introduced since 1.60, then yes.
If you are beta testing CYBERsitter, yes.
If you want to test a new feature, yes.
But if you are fine with your setup and are having
I am running version 1.60 should I be using the beta since its the newest
version?
The question is would you prefer to be running the latest released version
(1.60), or the latest beta (1.63)?
Usually, the betas are very stable. With 1.63, which was released Monday,
there are a few issues w
Has any one else noticed an increase in the number of legit companies listed
on SPAMCOP? I have been having to increase my white filter list.
Examples:
Ebay.com
Techrepublic.com
winntmag.com
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.relia
Word of warning: Many SPAM messages do not have a valid from address.
Therefore, in creating a bounce message, you will be adding bounce on top of
bounce and creating more volume and traffic for your sever and the Internet.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
I am running
version 1.60 should I be using the beta since its the newest
version?
Jerry
FreundInformation
Systems SupervisorPhoenix Gold Int'l Inc. tel.
503.286.9300 ext. 530fax. 503.978.8531
WWW.PHOENIXGOLD.COM WWW.CARVERPRO.COMWWW.AUDIOSOURCE.NET
Darrell,
Wednesday, November 27, 2002 you wrote:
DL> Is this a product of HOP or a hiccup on spamcop's side?
hop
DL> 11/26/2002 17:37:21 Qf79f094e00364534 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see
DL> http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?205.188.139.134). Action=WARN.
see http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=check
Is this a product of HOP or a hiccup on spamcop's side?
11/26/2002 17:37:21 Qf79f094e00364534 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?205.188.139.134). Action=WARN.
20021126 173719 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (094E0036) [152.163.225.100] EHLO
imo-r04.mx.aol.com
20021126 173719 127
For those who have a small enough volume and bounce messages that fail
your spam tests how do you word your bounce messages.
For example we use the following line "The message was rejected because
it failed the following SPAM detection tests and has been marked as
SPAM." This tends to get a few r
41 matches
Mail list logo
