I wanted to gain some advise on using message sniffer. It seems to be (from forum
comments) to be an awesome product. Is the message sniffer database of know spammers
kept up on their end and the test within declude checks it? Is the test quick per
10,000 emails? Thanks for the info.
]-Original Message-
]From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
]Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:01 AM
]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Information
]
]
]I wanted to gain some advise on using message sniffer. It seems
They update their database several times a day and notify you each time so that you
can automate your updates with a batch file. The scanning engine adds very little
extra processor load, in fact there was just an update to the engine that makes it
even faster. It is well worth the
Thank you for the info and link. From a transmission standpoint, when the sniffer
test is called, does it send you the message, you scan it, and then report back. Or
do you come to the message and scan it and then report back. Thank you again, for
your time.
Keith Johnson
Thats cleared that up,
Thanks Scott.
Darryl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New User -- Quick Question
I have Declude up now
Dan,
When you say 'automate your updates', does that mean a copy of the sniffer
database files are located on the Imail server for speed of processing. Thanks for
the info
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Dan Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
Scott:
You once said you
are thinking of adding Base64 parsing capability to Declude.
Has that moved in
the priorities?
Adding this to
Declude would truly make it a perfect spam killing machine... not having
it with the ever more usage of it is causing more spams to come
You once said you are thinking of adding Base64 parsing capability to Declude.
Has that moved in the priorities?
Adding this to Declude would truly make it a perfect spam killing
machine... not having it with the ever more usage of it is causing more
spams to come through.
With Base64 our
Scott...
Thank you... This is great.
This is a great help and one that will save us from having to explain the
issue over and over again.
Latest Beta? What is the release number? Currently wee have 1.67i3.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Latest Beta? What is the release number?
According to http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm , the latest beta
is 1.67.
Currently wee have 1.67i3.
Then you have this functionality already, as you are running an interim
release after the 1.67 beta.
-Scott
When you say 'automate your updates', does that mean a copy of the sniffer
database files are located on the Imail server for speed of processing.
Yes, the database gets downloaded from the ftp site, hopefully at least
daily (you decide). There is a batch file called AutoSNF on the ftp site (I
Is anyone using f-prot with Imail and Declude ??
I'm presently using Mcafee net shield but I am always looking for alternatives
...
TIA
Doris
I use F-Prot with Declude and I am very satisfied with it.
Mike
At 11:52 AM 2/17/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Is anyone
using f-prot with Imail and Declude ?? I'm presently using Mcafee net
shield but I am always looking for alternatives ...
TIA
Doris
Interestingly, I've found that not having a way to block email so encoded has forced
me to focus on non message body based triggers for my tests, resulting in tests that
are more robust all around. I will of course, embrace everything that makes such
encoding transparent, but I'm actually glad
Same here; no problems with F-Prot. Plus it fit our budget very nicely.
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole
use of the
intended recipient(s)
IMHO you'd be hard pressed to beat f-prot on the server or desktop. I found it to eat
fewer resources than the competitors I tested, and so far after maybe a year of using
it with Declude it has a 100% success rate in stopping email virii. Gotta love the
ability to check for updates at very
Howdy, Doris,
You might get a bigger response if you post this to
the Declude.Virus mailing list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a though
Take Care,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Doris
Dean
To: Declude
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:52
PM
Ditto.
Michael Graveen wrote:
I use F-Prot with Declude and I am very satisfied with it.
Mike
At 11:52 AM 2/17/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Is anyone using f-prot with Imail and Declude ?? I'm presently using
Mcafee net shield but I am always looking for alternatives ...
TIA
Doris
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
