RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...

2003-05-28 Thread Markus Gufler
I agree completly with scott ,and would like to add that deleting mail only with rbl test does not mean anything. Today I've read an article on a german website (c't computer magazine) http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/hob-27.05.03-000/ In short there's the information that the big

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist blacklist problem

2003-05-28 Thread Dan Patnode
Tommi, There seems to be a feature for this built into Imail, but as usual, tests outside of Declude aren't really useful. I got into trouble last week when the default setting bounced a non spam. Dan On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:50, Tommi Penttinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 08:54

[Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...

2003-05-28 Thread Kami Razvan
Scott: Thank you for your response. Since we started doing this (almost a week) I have noticed several real-life behavior from our server. What we used to see: - When a list was hitting our server I was seeing many Declude.exe processes at the same time - one after another taking 100% of CPU