> >Can someone tell me what it means, in the context of this discussion
list,
> >when someone puts "DSN" in the subject?
>
> That normally means that the E-mail failed the DSN test (which is run by
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org ). It usually means that the mailserver that
> sent the E-mail is run
Hi, Scott,
> >Can someone tell me what it means, in the context of this discussion
list,
> >when someone puts "DSN" in the subject?
>
> That normally means that the E-mail failed the DSN test (which is run by
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org ). It usually means that the mailserver that
> sent the E-
Can someone tell me what it means, in the context of this discussion list,
when someone puts "DSN" in the subject?
That normally means that the E-mail failed the DSN test (which is run by
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org ). It usually means that the mailserver that
sent the E-mail is running IMail's
Hello, All,
Can someone tell me what it means, in the context of this discussion list,
when someone puts "DSN" in the subject?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This E-mail is scanned and free from viruses. www.nexustechgroup
>> Would it? <<
In my opinion, yes.
What he basically wants is:
A) if domain does not appear in the SPAMDOMAINS file, then the weight should
remain uneffected (the outcome is: N/A - Not applicable).
B) if domain DOES appear in SPAMDOMAINS file and matches, then credit is
given for good behavior
Or, simply fixing the one test to have pass/fail weights assignable with
each test (in the .txt file, rather than the weights defined once in the
global.cfg, where in this case, they would be set to zero, zero -- thus
unknown domains are ignored)
something like:
.yahoo.co .yahoo. 5 -5
voila - a
> Today's discussions gave me the idea of some form of
> "Confidence" test. Ideally, that test should NOT require any
> external config files (low maintenance). It is somewhat
> similar to the IPNOTINMX "positive" test - in that it is
> intended to assign a negative weight for email that has a
>> The problem here is that instead of having a test with 2 results
(pass/fail), you've got a test with 3 results (pass/fail/na). That would
require a major change to the Declude architecture to handle. <<
But it would make sense .
Would it?
The only tests I can think of that can have more than
>Are you sure that the line in your sd.txt file is exactly
>"msn.com hotmail.com" (no spaces or other characters after
"hotmail.com")?
Yes. I copied that line and pasted it exactly and I double checked the
whitespace before I composed my questions.
One last thing to check: Is that the last l
Hi Scott:
Today's discussions gave me the idea of some form of "Confidence" test.
Ideally, that test should NOT require any external config files (low
maintenance). It is somewhat similar to the IPNOTINMX "positive" test - in
that it is intended to assign a negative weight for email that has a "hi
>> The problem here is that instead of having a test with 2 results
(pass/fail), you've got a test with 3 results (pass/fail/na). That would
require a major change to the Declude architecture to handle. <<
But it would make sense .
In the meantime, couldn't he define the test TWICE, once assign
>Are you sure that the line in your sd.txt file is exactly
>"msn.com hotmail.com" (no spaces or other characters after
"hotmail.com")?
Yes. I copied that line and pasted it exactly and I double checked the
whitespace before I composed my questions.
>Are you sure that you are not running an o
We haven't beaten SPAMDOMAINS sufficiently to death, so here's my
contribution. I have two observations:
One:
I have a line in my sd.txt file that says:
msn.com hotmail.com
This means that if an E-mail's return address has "msn.com" in it, the
reverse DNS must have either "msn.com" or "hotmail.
No. I mean that the test fails only if the from-domain was found in the
sd.txt file and the corresponding REVDNS- records does not match. (+X
points)
On the other side the test should pass only if the from-domain was also
found in the sd.txt file and the corresponding REVDNS- records does
match. (
Speaking of logging, would it be possible to add using a syslog daemon
as an option, I don't know off hand if it will save any processing
power, but it seems like it might since you will no longer have to
manage log file resources (locking, checking creation, destination
folder).
This is in the su
> Speaking of logging, would it be possible to add using a syslog daemon
> as an option, I don't know off hand if it will save any processing
> power, but it seems like it might since you will no longer have to
> manage log file resources (locking, checking creation, destination
> folder). It would
We haven't beaten SPAMDOMAINS sufficiently to death, so here's my
contribution. I have two observations:
One:
I have a line in my sd.txt file that says:
msn.com hotmail.com
as have several of the submitted spamdomain candidate lists.
I just found a message in my HOLD queue that failed SPAMDOMA
Nope, it does not run a lookup on every domain listed, only looks for a
match. If RDNS reports *.yahoo.com, and .yahoo.com is listed in the RDNS
filter file, then whatever negative point value you have defined will be
deducted from the overall weight of the message.
Bill
- Original Message --
Speaking of logging, would it be possible to add using a syslog daemon
as an option, I don't know off hand if it will save any processing
power, but it seems like it might since you will no longer have to
manage log file resources (locking, checking creation, destination
folder). It would certainly
> Do you mean that you think the SPAMDOMAINS test should work
> with domains
> that aren't listed in the sd.txt file? If so, what should
> the reverse DNS
> entry match?
No. I mean that the test fails only if the from-domain was found in the
sd.txt file and the corresponding REVDNS- records d
> A better way to do this is to setup a RDNS Filter and add a
> negative weight for any domain that you add that resolves
> correctly, like yahoo.com. For
> example:
>
> Global.cfg:
> REVDNS-FILTER filter M:\IMail\Declude\RevDNS-Filter.txt x 0 0
>
> REVDNS-FILTER (samples):
> REVDNS -10 ENDSWI
> The catch here is that all E-mail from domains that aren't
> listed in the
> sd.txt file will get a weight of -5 added to them, so that spam from
> domains not listed in the sd.txt file will be more likely to
> be delivered.
Is there any easy way to change this in a future release?
Do you mean t
A better way to do this is to setup a RDNS Filter and add a negative weight
for any domain that you add that resolves correctly, like yahoo.com. For
example:
Global.cfg:
REVDNS-FILTER filter M:\IMail\Declude\RevDNS-Filter.txt x 0 0
REVDNS-FILTER (samples):
REVDNS -10 ENDSWITH .travelocity.com
RE
> The catch here is that all E-mail from domains that aren't
> listed in the
> sd.txt file will get a weight of -5 added to them, so that spam from
> domains not listed in the sd.txt file will be more likely to
> be delivered.
Is there any easy way to change this in a future release? As I can
I would recommend switching that poor mailserver to IMail (or any
other mailserver that will include the IP address in the headers, which
is almost all of them).
My poor mail server is IMail v6. I received about 95 of these "blank
emails" since last Friday with different received times, I hav
Why not configure it like
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\sd.txt x 5 -5
This will give +5 points to any mail having a sender-domain listet in
sd.txt and failing this test. On the other side any legit message having
such a sender-domain that come from the right mailserver will ha
Um...er...yeah...I knew you could do that ..
It DOES sound too simple. Have I been using JM for all these years and I
didn't know you could have a "pass" weight in the config file?! I swear I
only ever knew you could add weight if it failed.
I guess I never questioned what all those zeros w
Application popup: smtp32.exe - Application Error : The application failed
to initialize properly (0xc142). Click on OK to terminate the
application.
You can find out more about this at http://www.declude.com/dq.htm --
upgrading Declude to v1.65 should help (it's technically a Microsoft issue
I would recommend switching that poor mailserver to IMail (or any other
mailserver that will include the IP address in the headers, which is
almost all of them).
My poor mail server is IMail v6. I received about 95 of these "blank
emails" since last Friday with different received times, I hav
Hi Adam,
Can you see these error messages also if you disable the spamchk-test in
decludes global.cfg-file?
Are there other external exe-files configured in the global.cfg?
It seems like all other exe-files called from declude (SMTP, and
SMTPD.EXE to deliver the message) cannot be started.
Mayby
> Is my logic solid here? Anything I'm missing?
Why not configure it like
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\sd.txt x 5 -5
This will give +5 points to any mail having a sender-domain listet in
sd.txt and failing this test. On the other side any legit message having
such a sender-
One other thing to think about. My workstation is in my home office. My mail
server is at my NOC. I have a VPN setup between my home office and the NOC
for administration of the servers.
Any mail I send shows a remote IP of my private address, sense my mail
server received it through the VPN.
Jo
> Eric originally said this would be added in v7.14, but it was not.
Perhaps it was
> added in v8.0; however, we're not running 8.0 yet so I don't know if it
was actually
> added or not. But if it was, this would make it possible for Scott to add
a test that
> flags authenticated SMTP sessions.
B
Hi all,
I want to run this by everyone before I do something potentially stupid...I
have occasions where good yahoo.com mail fails a FILTER or SNIFFER test and
along with failing NOPOSTMASTER and NOABUSE as yahoo always does, this
throws it over my bounce threshhold.
I'd like to ward this off by
Hello,
We are using Junkmail version 1.60. And we get these error messages every
once in awhile which stops the server from sending mail out because of these
error messages. Has anyone else run into this and what did you do to correct
this..
Application popup: spamchk.exe - Application Error : T
Is anyone doing anything about these messages. I am getting more and more
by the day!
Unfortunately:
Received: from mail.stevenstransport.com [10.100.1.17] by
mail.stevenstransport.com
(SMTPD32-6.00) id AD69710A015C; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 14:24:25 -0500
Received: FROM declude.com BY mail.stevenstr
Is anyone doing anything about these messages. I am getting more and more
by the day!
Thanks,
Kevin
Received: from mail.stevenstransport.com [10.100.1.17] by
mail.stevenstransport.com
(SMTPD32-6.00) id AD69710A015C; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 14:24:25 -0500
Received: FROM declude.com BY mail.stevenst
> Huh? Link is broken? You should be able to get it here:
> http://www.nerosoft.com/Download/KillListGenInst.exe
Thanks Scott. I was following a link from the Declude website
Scott, can you please fix the link on the Declude website? It's pointing
to the wrong place.
It's fixed now.
At 01:00 AM 06/09/2003, David Dodell wrote:
> Huh? Link is broken? You
should be able to get it here:
>
http://www.nerosoft.com/Download/KillListGenInst.exe
Thanks Scott. I was following a link from the Declude
website
Scott, can you please fix the link on the Declude website? It's pointing
to th
39 matches
Mail list logo
