Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NTVDM.exe failed to initialize

2003-06-23 Thread Bill Landry
Are you running the DOS or Windows version of F-Prot? If the 32bit Windows version, how do you have F-Prot setup in your virus.cfg file? It should be setup like: C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe -TYPE -SILENT -NOMEM -ARCHIVE -NOBOOT -DUMB -REPORT=report.txt using "fpcmd.exe" instead of "f-prot

[Declude.JunkMail] NTVDM.exe failed to initialize

2003-06-23 Thread Terry Parks
We're running Imail Version 8.0 with Hot Fix 1 and Declude Anti-virus (F-PROT), Anti-SPAM, HIJACK on a Windows 2003 Enterprise Server with dual CPU, 2GB of RAM and RAID 5. After running for over six hours we're seeing "NTVDM.EXE - The Application failed to initialize properly (0xc142) click on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kodak picture CD and Spam Domains

2003-06-23 Thread Darrell LaRock
Kami, Great idea!!! This is much better then using contains on the header (since header forging is easy). Darrell -- Original Message -- From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:15:06 -0400 >Hi; > >D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] messages getting through the blacklistfrom file

2003-06-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Version 1.70 The next thing to check for is to make sure that the ".checkyourinbox.com" line in your blacklist doesn't have any characters after it (watch out for spaces/tabs), and does have a carriage return after it (IE there is at least one line after it, even a blank line -- most programs t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] messages getting through the blacklist fro m file from file m file from file m file from file fro m file from file m file from file m file from file m file from file m file from file m file from file fro m file from file m file fromm file from file m file from file m file from file fro m file from file m file from file m file from file

2003-06-23 Thread Jeffrey Di Gregorio
Version 1.70 Jeffrey Di Gregorio Systems Administrator Pacific School of Religion -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] messages getting through the blacklist fro m fil

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager test

2003-06-23 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Since I have not got around to publishing the white paper on implementing SpamManager (Now Alligate) as an integrated test within Declude, here is a simple run down:   Here is what I do and what is recommended:   I defined 6 tests as below. Using the greater than and less than signs al

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] messages getting through the blacklistfro m file from file m file from file m file from file

2003-06-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Sorry, I should have posted the complete header for you to see. Notice the x-declude-sender entry in the header is a subdomain of my entry in the blacklist file. What version of Declude are you running (typing "\IMail\Declude -diag" from a command prompt will show you)? I believe that there was

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] messages getting through the blacklist fro m file from file m file from filem file from file

2003-06-23 Thread Jeffrey Di Gregorio
Sorry, I should have posted the complete header for you to see. Notice the x-declude-sender entry in the header is a subdomain of my entry in the blacklist file. Received: from mecca.psr.edu ([209.76.204.2]) by chirala.psr.edu with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Kodak picture CD and Spam Domains

2003-06-23 Thread Bill Landry
Kami, why not use "ENDSWITH" with your RDNS entries instead of "CONTAINS", since any spammer monitoring this list could easily setup something like this in their reverse DNS: junk.yahoo.com.spammer.com or spam.aol.com.junkmail.net and get a nice weight reduction of 20, which would certainly h

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS Test

2003-06-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
> SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\spamdomainlist.txt x 5 0 Now if I understand this correctly, this particular line means that 5 points will be added on to the total weight if a message fails the SPAMDOMAINS test? Correct. How would one go about forcing a hold for the failure of on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] messages getting through the blacklistfrom file

2003-06-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can anyone clarify why this message would get past the blacklist file I have set-up. The test is working fine most of the time, only once in a while one seems to sneak through. The entry in the fromfile is: .checkyourinbox.com (from the manual): --- Blacklisting is not working The "fromfile"

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS Test

2003-06-23 Thread Dan Geiser
Hi, Scott, Thanks for your original response to my e-mail. Sorry it took so long to follow-up. > >I've been trying to read all the messages related to this test and I'm > >having a hard time understanding what exactly the test is, i.e. what purpose > >it serves, and how I go about putting it in

[Declude.JunkMail] messages getting through the blacklist from file

2003-06-23 Thread Jeffrey Di Gregorio
Can anyone clarify why this message would get past the blacklist file I have set-up.  The test is working fine most of the time, only once in a while one seems to sneak through.   The entry in the fromfile is: .checkyourinbox.com   The partial header of the message is:   Received: fr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kodak picture CD and Spam Domains

2003-06-23 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; Do you know what the REVDNS is? We are finding good results for adding negative weight to domains that are like this. We simply have a negative REVDNS list. REVDNS -20 CONTAINS .yahoo.com REVDNS -20 CONTAINS .aol.com The above are two e

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] IPNOTINMX

2003-06-23 Thread Omar K.
Holding for a specific test, and not a specific weight, for me, is a waste of the $$$ you paid for declude, and all the programming hours Scott and his team has put on this great product and its weighting technique. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be

[Declude.JunkMail] Kodak picture CD and Spam Domains

2003-06-23 Thread Darrell LaRock
I have been seeing a lot of mail failing the spam domains test with kodak's picture cd. It allows users to use their own email address when sending pictures, but it comes from Kodak's servers. Is their any other way around this? Right now I setup a filter to subtract the spam domains weight if p

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] IPNOTINMX

2003-06-23 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, Samantha, > I was having a problem this morning receiving mail from outside. I test > from a Hotmail and Yahoo account and could not receive from either. > > I put a HOLD on the IPNOTINMX in the $Default$Junkmail. I had to take it > off this morning because of alot of calls not getting ma

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager test

2003-06-23 Thread Mike Gable
Hi,   I've got SpamManager running as a test only in Declude, and while it catches nearly everything SPAM it also has a lot of false positives, so I was wondering if I could create specific HEADER tests with different actions taken based on the SpamManager points system results. A SpamManage

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS strangeness

2003-06-23 Thread Bill Landry
Make the spamdomains entry for yahoo: yahoo. instead of: @yahoo. .yahoo. There is no need to have it setup with these extra parameters. Let us know if that resolves your problem. Bill - Original Message - From: "Sheldon Koehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Se

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS strangeness

2003-06-23 Thread Sheldon Koehler
> This E-mail should not have failed the SPAMDOMAINS test, but it was > whitelisted, so it is not possible to tell whether or not it failed the > SPAMDOMAINS test without looking at the log file. This was the last email she received from the list. She is now getting messages saying her email is be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] IPNOTINMX

2003-06-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
I was having a problem this morning receiving mail from outside. I test from a Hotmail and Yahoo account and could not receive from either. I put a HOLD on the IPNOTINMX in the $Default$Junkmail. I had to take it off this morning because of alot of calls not getting mail. Why would putting a HOL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS strangeness

2003-06-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Some yahoogroups.com email is bouncing and some is not... Below is a header. Right now my sd.txt file has: @yahoo. .yahoo. That line means that any E-mail with a return address including "@yahoo" must have a reverse DNS entry with ".yahoo." in it (or "@yahoo.", but that won't appear in a revers

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS strangeness

2003-06-23 Thread Sheldon Koehler
Some yahoogroups.com email is bouncing and some is not... Below is a header. Right now my sd.txt file has: @yahoo. .yahoo. Any suggestions? Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com [65.161.10.61] by tenforward.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.15) id A4CA78D0088; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:29:30 -0700 Received

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another new test

2003-06-23 Thread Karen D. Oland
use spamdomains. works great. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug McKee > Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 5:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Another new test > > > This morning I received three spam from my own

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Explanation

2003-06-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Below are the header lines of a piece of spam. I am certain that my mail server (65.38.154.56) delivered the e-mail to mail.tahoemountainclub.com (an exchange server). Is the mail.com server (63.243.127.170) sending spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most likely, since that is the address in the "To:" hea