Title: Message
Hi:
Is there a filter
that can only pickup the UserID rather than theentire
Mailfrom?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
we are seeing a
lot of spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it would be good to be able to have a filter
like:
USERIDIS
*
Regards,
Kami
Title: Message
Kami,
Why
not
MAILFROM0STARTSWITH*@
George
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:34
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?
Title: Message
that is a good
idea...
It would do
exactly as I wanted...
How come I did not
think of that? :) .. It has to be Monday again?
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of George KulmanSent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003
Title: Message
Kami, you have already used up your
quota of Mondays for the month of August. One more, and you get 50 lashes with
a wet noodle.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
Title: Message
Better
than awet patch cord I guess. Ow, that almost hurts just thinking about
it.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:53 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Just double checking, but we do NOT have a way to block specific
attachments in Declude JM Pro, correct ?
Karl Drugge, Systems Network Engineer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
Here's 2...
MESSAGE.ZIP
YOUR_DETAILS.ZIP
Although they are really viruses.
On 8/19/2003 12:30pm you wrote...
Just double checking, but we do NOT have a way to block specific
attachments in Declude JM Pro, correct ?
Correct (because we're not yet aware of spammers that are attaching files
Here's what I did with the comments: I created the following tests
COMMENTS20 comments20 x 10 0
COMMENTS40 comments40 x 10 0
COMMENTS60 comments60 x 10 0
COMMENTS80 comments
Ok, I've got a question about the COMMENTS test. Since I have a copy of
every email I've gotten from this and the AV list since I joined, I looked
through them and didn't see my answer. I also looked at the JM revisions
page and found nothing either, so here goes. Below is the line from the
May be a dumb question but how are you setting up JM to block these.
Jeff
**
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi;
I have setup:
BODY20 Contains211.155.234.84
That is the IP address used in the email we received. We hold on 20
This was just made the news...
Citigroup Is Latest Victim Of Phishing Expedition Aug. 19, 2003
The financial company's logo is the latest to be
That's right. Each is incremental, so if you have 75 comments it will give a
weight of 10+10+10=30
You may wish to change the weight assigned for each to suit your
circumstances. We use a weight system at approx. twice the default ones in
order to arrive at a safe delete point of 100.
Is the new manual baked yet ?
-Rock
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New manuals
Any progress on the new manuals? We are holding off
We are evaluating this new RHSBL site that SecuritySage is hosting, and it
appears to be working well thus far. Info can be found at:
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html
The entry we are using in our global.cfg file is:
SECURITYSAGE rhsbl
Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use:
COMMENTS comments weight x 5 0
where the test will accumulate the total number of obfuscation comments it
finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight result for the
test. I don't see the comments test documented on
That would be cool, but wouldn't that increment from zero, so that even one
single comment would score a 6?
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use:
COMMENTS comments weight x 5 0
where the test will accumulate the total number of obfuscation comments it
finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight result for the
test.
So which is a preferrable approach?
That's correct. However, you can set the value I showed in the example as
5, to anything you want, including zero 0, which would then add a weight
exactly matching the number of obfuscated comments found in the message.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Tandem Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi All,
Is there anything that will work with I-mail or stand alone that will enable
the end user to adjust their declude settings from a web based terminal?
Trying not to re-invent the wheel if I do not have to.
THANKS
Peter
-Peter Lent
Technology Services Manager
Goodwill Industries of
For anyone who wants this, here's a new script that will sort your
delude log files and gives a simple easy to read report. This ones been
cleaned up since the last one, and takes into account garbled and
corrupt log files. Much easier to use, and no file renaming required.
The only thing you have
Even though the replies come back with 127.0.0.5, I had to change my
global.cfg entry to:
SECURITYSAGE rhsbl blackhole.securitysage.com * 2 0
in order for it to work correctly.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Is there anything that will work with I-mail or stand alone that
will enable the end user to adjust their declude settings from a web
based terminal?
It can be built using the IMail Web Messaging interface, but I don't
think anybody's come up with a one-size solution yet. A rather
We have just put our own web interface on-line. Have a look at
https://ss.alberni.net/spamcontrol/Login.asp
The userid is 'declude' and the password is 'junkmail'. I'll leave that
address up for a couple of days but don't nobody start spamming from it.
:-)
We have also written a management
Does anyone have any configs they are willing to share that they are using in
production for Alligate with Declude? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
áÁj)pjË jyÞuú+¾*î±ëÈ7ç^V*î²m§ÿðÃ^r[yÊN¬f¢yúèØ^
ç%¹ºy j)fj)b b²Ôèº{.nÇ+·£ºËlzwZI[hf¢Êïuç%¹¢f§vzé ®Þ
ç%¹ºy j)S
æ«r¯zÇ·¢éÝjØm¶ÿÃ
I know there were some posts
about this a while back but I cannot find what I am looking for now in my
Declude mailbox.
We hold all spam, delete
nothing. Spam is held in the D:\IMail\spool\spam dir and we use Mail
Review to go though looking for FPs. I would like to hold higher weighted
Do you mean as a Declude ONLY test?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:18 PM
To:
26 matches
Mail list logo
