RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: GREP Help Needed

2004-05-31 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message Ah, the easy answer is that grep is not the way. You want something a little higher up on the food chain, awk. gawk "$4 == 2" netflow.txt or the identical but clearer: gawk "$4 == 2 {print $0}" netflow.txt will parse the file called netflow.txt and only output thethe

[Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Hi, I'm trying to detect mails weight = 15 that did NOT fail "Sniffer". I have: Global.cfg: SNIFFER external nonzero "D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.exe ?"40SNIFFER-SNAKEexternal 052"D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.exe ?"10SNIFFER-SCAMS external

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Matt
Andy, That's not how MINWEIGHT works. MINWEIGHT is used for a filter so that it doesn't subtract any more than the value that you give it, generally a negative number unless you get fancy and apply scoring tests first. The only way to do this currently would be to create an external test to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm trying to detect mails weight = 15 that did NOT fail Sniffer. In NOTSNIFFEDfilter.txt MINWEIGHT 15 TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER REMOTEIP 0 CONTAINS . The problem here is that the MINWEIGHT option in a filter determines a minimum weight at which filter processing will stop. This is a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message fgrep "Total weight = " dec0531.log | fgrep -v "SNIFFER" | gawk "$NF =20" result.txt sample contents of result.txt: 05/31/2004 00:01:44 Qd84b1ec600561d03 IPNOTINMX:2 HELOBOGUS:6 MAILFROM:9 REVDNS:4 CMDSPACE:5 COUNTRY:10 DSBL:6 SPAMCOP:3 SPAMCOP-DYNA:7 FIVETENSRC:2

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Hi Matt: Uh - I see. We would need a "SKIPIFWEIGHTLESS" option. Scott? But - I still don't understand why I don't see lots of entries for "NOTSNIFFed". If anything, now I should see lots of legitimate mail "match" that test? Best RegardsAndy SchmidtHM Systems Software,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Matt
I believe that MINWEIGHT 15 always exits the filter since it starts with a score of zero. If Andrew's suggestion doesn't work for your purposes, there's likely a kludge that can be written with multiple filter files that can do this. Matt Andy Schmidt wrote: Message Hi Matt:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Hi Andrew, cool. Unfortunately, my goal was to route the messages not just "count". Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Pete McNeil
I'm just curious... Wouldn't the following work for the intended purpose (in this case)... NOTSNIFFED external 0 . ... Specifically - an external test that fails on a zero result should work right Scott? _M On Monday, May 31, 2004, 7:01:50 PM, Matt wrote: M I believe that MINWEIGHT 15

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Andy Schmidt
I think I found a solution. Global.cfg: SNIFFER externalnonzero D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.EXE 4 0 SNIFFER-SNAKE external052 D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.EXE 1 0 SNIFFER-SCAMS external053

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Matt
That's the way to do it :) Matt Andy Schmidt wrote: I think I found a solution. Global.cfg: SNIFFER externalnonzero D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.EXE 4 0 SNIFFER-SNAKE external052 D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.EXE 1

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Andy Schmidt
That's the way to do it Nope - it was a failure. The WEIGHTRANGE doesn't get processed by Declude until the end. So when the FITLER is running, the WEIGHTRANGE hasn't been set yet - apparently. So, Scott... We're back to needing SKIPIFWEIGHTLESS! Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Matt
Andy, I'm a big proponent of a skip if less than or more than setup, however I would like to see this in the Global.cfg so that the filter files don't even need to be opened and read if the proper weights have been tripped, thus saving a bunch of processing. This could be done with two

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed

2004-05-31 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Thank's Matt - smart work-around. I incorporated the key concept and it seems to work! Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of