[Declude.JunkMail] BODY 1 CONTAINS....

If I create a filter that checks the body, will it include the attachment as well?     Jay Calvert

[Declude.JunkMail] New Phishing attempt..

Hi; Just received a phishing attempt..   possible filter: www.web-da-us-citi-verify.net     Regards, Kami == Received: from server1.hostingplex.com [66.48.80.137] by clickandpledge.com with ESMTP  (SMTPD32-8.12) id AE61108029A; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:43:13 -0400Received: from asteg

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

Gosh, Mozilla won't open it either... Guess I'll be left out again. _M On Friday, June 25, 2004, 2:50:49 PM, Jeff wrote: JM> Oh darn.. The page didn't open in Opera 7.51 and Norton Antivirus 2004 JM> caught the download.ject worm.. :) JM> -Original Message- JM> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] J

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

> Your webservers, sure. That's the easy part, the patch was > available in early April. > > Your desktops, no, not if your users use Internet Explorer. > There is no patch yet, and it's been exploited for at least 2 months. > > For a whitehat demonstration, use your fully patched IE to go t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

Me three. I installed FireBird a long, long time ago at home. I had no problems, ever. But then I got the upgrade itch, so I'm on the latest FireFox now, with nifty extensions. And I cut the cord last weekend, by deleting all my Favorites out of IE (years and years worth!). Now I use IE for a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices

Never received a reply. I just sent a new request in. Thanks, Greg John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: You configuration is fine with one recommendation: You would off load additional workload from the main server by having it send all outbound e-mail through a smart host, that being the Ant-spam server

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

At 01:50 PM 6/25/2004, Jeff Maze wrote: Oh darn.. The page didn't open in Opera 7.51 and Norton Antivirus 2004 caught the download.ject worm.. :) I've just recently been turned on to FireFox http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ I love it... Nice, simple, it works, and it's not vulnerable to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

I just went there with Symantec 9 installed with the Jun 16, 2004 signatures installed it detected the download.ject Threat. SO IE 6 SP1 was going to run it but my AV caught and killed it. Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices

I thought I sent a reply that the form was blank. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Foulks > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 7:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

Oh darn.. The page didn't open in Opera 7.51 and Norton Antivirus 2004 caught the download.ject worm.. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 2:37 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Declude.Jun

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

Your webservers, sure. That's the easy part, the patch was available in early April. Your desktops, no, not if your users use Internet Explorer. There is no patch yet, and it's been exploited for at least 2 months. For a whitehat demonstration, use your fully patched IE to go to: http://62.131

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

If I set up an spf record for my primary domain, but don't set one up for my virutal domain, will this cause problems? No. E-mail from your primary domain will be SPF-enabled (so other mailservers running SPF will treat mail from your primary domain differently), whereas E-mail from your virtua

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

Adding an SPF record for the domain works the same no matter how the domain is handled by IMail. So if you have a virtual domain example.com, you would set up the SPF record exactly the same as you would if you had a "real" domain of example.com. If I set up an spf record for my primary doma

[Declude.JunkMail] Managing whitelisting your clients

List, I'm curious as to how others are managing whitelisting if your policy is to never tag messages sent from your clients as spam. Currently, I have the $default$.junkmail in the root \declude\ directory set to IGNORE all tests - which works to an extent. The major issue I have is when a clien

[Declude.JunkMail] MAPS services

Does anyone have any comments on the usefulness and reliability of the various MAPS RBL tests (RUL, DUL, RSS, OPS, NML)?  I would love to hear some feedback before I subscribe.   Jeffrey     Jeffrey Di Gregorio    CCNP MCSE Systems Administrator Pacific School of Religion [EMAIL PRO

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What version of Declude supports SPF testing?

It only supports a portion of the current SPF specifications. Delcude only allows for pass and fail it will not return a softfail. Scott, When are you going to add the other actions to declude Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What version of Declude supports SPF testing?

It only supports a portion of the current SPF specifications. Delcude only allows for pass and fail it will not return a softfail. Scott, When are you going to add the other actions to declude As soon as the spec truly freezes. They tried once, but didn't keep it in the freezer long enough,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spf test

Per instructions on http://spf.pobox.com/wizard.html I have set up my SPF record. However, this TXT record now has a ~all in it to signify there may be exeptions to the rule, signifying those would be a softfail in stead of a hardfail using the -all rule. Tes

[Declude.JunkMail] spf test

Hi,   Per instructions on http://spf.pobox.com/wizard.html I have set up my SPF record. However, this TXT record now has a ~all in it to signify there may be exeptions to the rule, signifying those would be a softfail in stead of a hardfail using the -all rule.   Testing this at http://www.dn

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What version of Declude supports SPF testing?

Im running the latest release version (I think). What version supports this? SPF support is in the latest beta (1.79). -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable vi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

Thanks! We are patched. Sharyn We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan Single Barrel Rum, judged "Best in the World" at the annual San Francisco Wine and Spirits Championships. For more information, please click (go to) http://www.cruzanrums.com";>www.cruzanrums.c

[Declude.JunkMail] What version of Declude supports SPF testing?

Im running the latest release version (I think). What version supports this? Sharyn We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan Single Barrel Rum, judged "Best in the World" at the annual San Francisco Wine and Spirits Championships. For more information, please clic

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

Although I run my mail server here, we do "lease" our IP address block from our ISP. We don't, however, have our outgoing smtp settings configured for our ISP's mailserver. Does this have to be reflected in the set up as well? All you would need here is to list the IP(s) that the mailserver uses -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

To add a DNS text record in MS DNS... 1. Right click on the domain name, the right panel of the DNS MMC, or click on the "Action" button on the menu to show the context menu that allows you to add records. 2. Select "Other New Records" and then select "Text". 3. Leave the "Record Name" field blan

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

Another question on this.. Although I run my mail server here, we do "lease" our IP address block from our ISP. We don't, however, have our outgoing smtp settings configured for our ISP's mailserver. Does this have to be reflected in the set up as well? Thanks for everyone's help. Sharyn We a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AutoWhite by eServices

John, Did you guys ever get my Demo request form? Thanks, Greg John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: You configuration is fine with one recommendation: You would off load additional workload from the main server by having it send all outbound e-mail through a smart host, that being the Ant-spam server. Th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

There is an option to add other types and it is listed in there. I added one yesterday as a test and it worked fine here. Sincerely, Grant Griffith EI8HT LEGS Enhanced Web Management http://www.getafreewebsite.com 877-483-3393 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

If I have a virtual domain that is configured on my mail server, and I am looking at setting up an SPF record, is there somewhere that the virutual domain has to be specified? Adding an SPF record for the domain works the same no matter how the domain is handled by IMail. So if you have a virt

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

Title: OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN? http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/download_ject.mspx - Original Message - From: Sharyn Schmidt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 8:43 AM Subject: [Declud

[Declude.JunkMail] Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF

Title: Maybe OT - Virtual domains and SPF If I have a virtual domain that is configured on my mail server, and I am looking at setting up an SPF record, is there somewhere that the virutual domain has to be specified? I am looking at the pobox.com SPF wizard and don't really see anything the

[Declude.JunkMail] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

Title: OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN? Here is what CNN says: http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/06/24/internet.attack.ap/index.html Sharyn

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional test weighting

on 6/24/04 6:07 PM, Imail Admin wrote: > Is it possible to make the weight of a test conditional? > > Here is my thinking: we've been having problems with our own users getting > zapped by the CMDSPACE test. We are running IMail 7.15, so we don't have > access to the whitelist auth option. We c

[Declude.JunkMail] Sort of OT - Desktop anti spam software

Title: Sort of OT - Desktop anti spam software We are looking for a desktop solution to be used as an added defense against spam. This would be used in addition to Declude Junkmail. It would reside on the users' desktop, and would be managed by the user, as opposed to the mail admin (ME!)

[Declude.JunkMail] AHBLSOURCES feedback

Interesting answer from AHBLSOURCES (found in message header) X-RBL-Warning: AHBLSOURCES: "1078244721 bruns - Spam Source - Too many ranges to list - TELEFONICA DE ESPANA - needs to clean up their abuse problem on rima-tde.net before removal will happen" Or in other words: "Hi world! Do you kno