Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: Availability of ldap2aliases 0.5.00, useful script for IMail MXs fronting IMail mailbox servers

2004-07-28 Thread Matt
Sandy, This looks very interesting, but I'm not quite clear on the mechanisms at work here and I would appreciate it if you would help to clarify. It all sounds like it would work for my needs, but maybe not 'out of the box'. I have 4 questions that would help to clear some of the fog: 1) I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: Availability of ldap2aliases 0.5.00, useful script for IMail MXs fronting IMail mailbox servers

2004-07-28 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Not sure if Sandy is still up, so here is my best shot: 1) I have a mix of gatewayed domains and locally hosted domains. It seems that this script is really built for locally hosted domains and would need to be extended to say take in addresses stored in a flat file or database. Is that

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: Availability of ldap2aliases 0.5.00, useful script for IMail MXs fronting IMail mailbox servers

2004-07-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Thanks to John for stepping in! Everything he said is on-point. I am, stupidly, still up. This will be my last post for tonight, though. 1) I have a mix of gatewayed domains and locally hosted domains. It seems that this script is really built for locally hosted domains and would

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: Availability of ldap2aliases 0.5.00, useful script for IMail MXs fronting IMail mailbox servers

2004-07-28 Thread Matt
Thanks for the explanation. I'm still however less than perfectly clear as to how the gateway handles the forwarding of the E-mail to the real mail server. Am I correct in assuming that the gateway would have [EMAIL PROTECTED] configured as an alias that pointed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: Availability of ldap2aliases 0.5.00, useful script for IMail MXs fronting IMail mailbox servers

2004-07-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Am I correct in assuming that the gateway would have [EMAIL PROTECTED] configured as an alias that pointed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the main mail server would need to have a domain alias set up for destination.example.com in order to get the E-mail? The server

[Declude.JunkMail] [OT] Good iMail syslog viewer

2004-07-28 Thread Jeff Maze
Hello, Was wondering if anyone knows of a good iMail syslog viewer. Would like to see the IP addresses of messages arriving to try and block the [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. type of mass mailers.. Thanks..

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [OT] Good iMail syslog viewer

2004-07-28 Thread Fritz Squib
http://www.baremetalsoft.com/baretail/index.php Great program except for the nag screen. Fritz Frederick P. Squib, Jr. Network Operations/Mail Administrator Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg http://www.wpa.net () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\-

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [OT] Good iMail syslog viewer

2004-07-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Was wondering if anyone knows of a good iMail syslog viewer. www.kiwisyslog.com. Indispensable. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [OT] Good iMail syslog viewer

2004-07-28 Thread Evans Martin
Are you looking for something like the unix tail f command? We are finishing up on a Windows program that works like tail f and grep combined. Let me know if you are interested and Ill work harder. It is not far from completion. Thanks, Evans Martin http://www.martekware.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: Availability of ldap2aliases 0.5.00, useful script for IMail MXs fronting IMail mailbox servers

2004-07-28 Thread Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote: - IMail's topmost host name on the mailbox server will _surely_ not be example.com, so you can use this routing domain (note the double '@'): @example.com@server host name I understood the other points/issues, but not the one above. I'm not sure that

[Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
Scott, has any more thought been given to implementing different spam/hold directories for different domains or for matching certain weights? Instead of deleting mail over a certain weight, I would like to be able to drop it into a separate directory for parsing and submission to spam databases -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, has any more thought been given to implementing different spam/hold directories for different domains or for matching certain weights? It's something we still want to do, but it isn't as easy as it sounds, which is why it has not happened yet.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scott, has any more thought been given to implementing different spam/hold directories for different domains or for matching certain weights? It's something we still want to do, but it isn't as easy as it sounds, which is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Are external tests run after all Declude internal tests have been run? No. They are run in the middle. Do external tests get run in the order they are placed in the global.cfg file? If there are multiple external tests, the external tests will be run in the order they are placed in the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are external tests run after all Declude internal tests have been run? No. They are run in the middle. Do external tests get run in the order they are placed in the global.cfg file? If there are multiple external tests,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Okay, final question on this subject. Can I setup declude to send me the final resolved message instead of sending it back to IMail? I seem to recall that Declude supported something like chaining? Yes, you can do that, by adding a line such as DAISYCHAIN C:\IMail\Declude\program.exe to the

[Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread David Fletcher
I am trying to help out the admin of another server by showing him results from Declude here on our server. I am unclear as to what's wrong with the Date: header below. I suspect that it was added by Imail. The bad header lookup at Declude.com lists it as a bogus Date: header. If Imail added it

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
I am trying to help out the admin of another server by showing him results from Declude here on our server. I am unclear as to what's wrong with the Date: header below. I suspect that it was added by Imail. That is exactly the problem. Since it was added by IMail, it means that there was no

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread Patrick Childers
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Fletcher Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header I am trying to help out the admin of another server by showing him results from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread David Fletcher
Thanks. I just wanted to be sure. -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header I am trying to help out the admin of another server by showing him

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread Dave Doherty
For a simple implementation of this, why not try: WEIGHT20 MAILBOX SUPERSPAM WEIGHT10 MAILBOX SPAM in the CFG file? - Original Message - From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:19 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread Serge
what is the easiest way to refuse mail from a remote ip imail or declude ? if imail, how to configure ? TIA - Original Message - From: David Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:27 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
what is the easiest way to refuse mail from a remote ip imail or declude ? if imail, how to configure ? The best way (and probably easiest) is the IMail SMTP Control Access file (in the SMTP security settings). It should be fairly straightforward to block individual IPs there. That will

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay, final question on this subject. Can I setup declude to send me the final resolved message instead of sending it back to IMail? I seem to recall that Declude supported something like chaining? Yes, you can do that,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Unique spam/hold directories

2004-07-28 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: Dave Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a simple implementation of this, why not try: WEIGHT20 MAILBOX SUPERSPAM WEIGHT10 MAILBOX SPAM in the CFG file? I could do that, except I want the files in their D*.SMD and Q*.SMD formats, not in an mbx file. That

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread Robert
Doesn't the Imail SMTP control only allow for 20 ip addresses? Thanks Robert - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:45 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header what is the easiest way to refuse

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

2004-07-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Doesn't the Imail SMTP control only allow for 20 ip addresses? It's unclear -- I believe that there is no limit, although someone from Ipswitch did post that there was a limit (20? 100?), but I believe he was mistaken. -Scott --- Declude