We have just released version 2.0 of invURIBL. Version 2.0 extends
basicURI filtering functionality by incorporating features that will
allow you tocheck the URI's IP address and name servers against DNS based
blacklists. Inaddition, we have added a unique feature that allows you to
check t
Goran Jovanovic wrote:
Hi,
Are others out there having problems with this spate of SPAM that looks
like
Re: (75-31) Meddic.ations
Re: (66-66) Phar.maaccy
Re: [STL/79]-Medicattions
Etc
In the subject line.
Some of these are getting caught by SNIFFER, some by invURIBL but
nothing really consisten
On Monday, March 14, 2005, 5:59:15 PM, Markus wrote:
MG> 2.) Log file processing with MDLP (Modular Declude Logfile
MG> Processor) written by Pete McNeil This tool does extremely fast
MG> parsing of declude jm logfiles. Pete's primary intention was to
MG> write a tool that's able to analyze resul
> I know from reading the list that some of you have set up
> your own automated systems that notify your users of held
> messages and allow them to requeue them automatically.
I think you mean "user based" and not automated reviev and requeuing.
That's what I've set up in the past month's
On Monday, March 14, 2005, 4:40:26 PM, Darin wrote:
DC> Yep...It does seem to be getting worse. Sniffer is catching a lot, but a
DC> lot is still slipping through, due mostly to constantly changing domain
DC> names of various ages.
DC> We're just supplementing Sniffer and blacklists with interna
Thanks a Million For spam I was whitelisting the sender by adding it
to the global.cfg then removing it .
I had no idea what I was going to do for blocked attachments.. but i
bet it will work for them also.
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
To get an email in smartermail to not rescan place a
Yep...It does seem to be getting worse. Sniffer is catching a lot, but a
lot is still slipping through, due mostly to constantly changing domain
names of various ages.
We're just supplementing Sniffer and blacklists with internal body filters
and SURBL lists, so after the first report of one slip
To get an email in smartermail to not rescan place a capital 'X' in front of
the file names. Smartermail will still pickup the file and pass it to
declude but when declude sees the 'X' it will not scan the email.
Declude tech support gave me this little tid bit. There still is an issue
with Smarte
Kevin,
How were you able to get by the rescanning of the email and allowing
it to be delivered in smartermail?
I am working on a web version of spamreview for smartermail and had
to use an ugly hack to get around it.
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
http://www.ssc-isp.net/HoldAnalyzer
I wrote this
Hi,
Are others out there having problems with this spate of SPAM that looks
like
Re: (75-31) Meddic.ations
Re: (66-66) Phar.maaccy
Re: [STL/79]-Medicattions
Etc
In the subject line.
Some of these are getting caught by SNIFFER, some by invURIBL but
nothing really consistently. So I get a lot
Thanks Kevin. I'll try it out and give you feedback on it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 3:20 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
http://www.
http://www.ssc-isp.net/HoldAnalyzer
I wrote this and made it available. Please send feedback. I have a newer
version that also works with smartermail and fixes a few bugs and simplifies
the admin GUI.
I hope to make the newer version availble by the end of the month or so.
Kevin Bilbee
> --
Simpler for me, not them, though. I'm the one that understands how to
do the complicated stuff, not them, so I believe I should be the one
doing the complicated stuff to make it as easy for them as possible.
I don't just want to move their spam to another folder because then they
still have to
Hmmm...different people will probably prefer different solutions, but you
can make arguments both ways as to which is "easier."
Scenario 1:
- Send the user a summary email of held messages that they can click on to
requeue.
- Since they may not have enough info from the summary email, they may cli
Personal whitelists avoid this issue by checking a particular user's address
book instead of using global whitelisting. Global whitelists have benefits
if they are strictly managed, but personal whitelists are safer.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Also, I don't like using AUTOWHITELIST because it is too easy (and
intuitive) to add their co-workers on the same domain (it IS a contact
list after all). This ends up causing a spam whitelist-a-thon as spam
gets sent to every email address on the domain at once, then ends up
whitelisted for all of
It would be much simpler to route the held mail to a junkmail mailbox, and
have the users use WebMail to check it. As an added benefit, they can
whitelist senders there by adding them to their contact list in WebMail.
It does require Declude Pro, however, to use the ROUTE action.
Darin.
-
I know from reading the list that some of you have set up your own
automated systems that notify your users of held messages and allow them
to requeue them automatically. I am hoping that one or more of you
might be willing to offer guidance and help me set up such a system on
my network.
Here's
18 matches
Mail list logo
