[Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread System Administrator
Any dns experts on the list? Last week I noticed our one dns server was running at 100% cpu and using nearly all its available memory. Reboot. Problem goes away until next day. Repeat, etc. I determined that an outside entity was hammering the dns server. Blocked them at the main router. Problem

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread Markus Gufler
Any dns experts on the list? I'm not an expert but ...The server needs to do dns lookups for our clients, That's not a problem as long as you allow outgoing DNS traffic on your firewall (or in your case cisco router) and needs to be available to other internet DNS servers for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Greg, this would be a good question to pose in the forums at Scott Perry's hobby hangout: http://www.dnsstuff.com/pages/forums.htm For my two cents, you probably want to identify the kind of DNS traffic that is coming in, not just who the high volume senders are, that might help you understand

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread System Administrator
on 8/18/05 1:49 PM, Markus Gufler wrote: Are they querrieng info's about domain names you're hosting or are this requests for completely other domains and your server does the lookup and report the result to the client. The second case (other domains). From what I've been able to determine,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread Matt
Agreed on the splitting idea. Keep one DNS firewalled from the outside world and for use just by your clients and their address space, and then another one that only resolves what you host and is open to everyone. If this requires investing in another box, it might make sense to just move your

[Declude.JunkMail] email Server being Block By AOL- Need suggestions on Getting this problem resolved with them

2005-08-18 Thread Howard Smith
Our email server has been blocked by AOL and we are having trouble getting answers from them . Can anyone give me suggestions on getting this resolved ASAP. Howard Smith

[Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS and HELOBOGUS coming up a lot

2005-08-18 Thread Kevin Rogers
These tests (especially BADHEADERS) seem to be catching a lot of legit mail lately. I've attached one of the headers It seems like many of the emails are sent from Exchange servers. What exactly makes the headers bad?Any ideas? Received: from ss_email.ssc.internal [216.201.186.154] by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] email Server being Block By AOL- Need suggestions on Getting this problem resolved with them

2005-08-18 Thread Darin Cox
Best bet is to contact their postmaster hotline. Number is available at postmaster.aol.com. You should sign up for their feedback loop to help avoid future problems. Darin. - Original Message - From: Howard Smith To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS and HELOBOGUS coming up a lot

2005-08-18 Thread Matt
Kevin, Microsoft E-mail clients have a nasty habit of excluding the To when there are only CC or BCC recipients. You will almost exclusively see this on some sort of E-mail blast from Exchange servers. The proper (RFC compliant) way to construct the headers when no To address is specified

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS and HELOBOGUS coming up a lot

2005-08-18 Thread Erik
Hi Kevin, This email is more our/your FYI than much an answer to your question: We've also noticed this on other tests of Declude that are built in; but not much on BADHEADERS. Decludes BADHEADERS test is a good test and accurate in our opinion; but we have lowered the score on this test as

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Or Instead so splitting if you are running bind set acl security so your local addresses can do recursion and the public at large can only resolve locally hosted domains. This type of setup allows our internal blocks to query the DNS with recursion and the allow-queryin the options

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Previous email should have said Or Instead fo splittingrun bind and Oh yea we uses bind on our windows 2000 servers instead of MS due to the portability and stability. Although MS DNS is very stable it may require OS tweaking to get it to function stabily under heavy loads. See the

[Declude.JunkMail] NOT getting list e-mails AGAIN

2005-08-18 Thread Marc Catuogno
Has this list and the virus list dumped anyone else recently? I'd feel better if someone said yes. This is the second time in about two months that I suddenly stopped getting Declde e-mails. Last time they said it had something to do with their DNS but it concerns me that I may also be missing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS and HELOBOGUS coming up a lot

2005-08-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi You are using both Sniffer and the Invariant Systems URI tests together? Maybe I was even denser than I thought, but I thought they sort of duplicated each other. Thanks, Rob snip on We have learned over the past year, that most of the built-in tests of Declude are not effective like

[Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Search Companion 2003

2005-08-18 Thread Marc Catuogno
The 2003 Search companion in Sever 2003 sucks - I just moved from a 2000 sever. Does anyone know how to modify its default setting? When I used to dig through held e-mails on the 2000 server I would use it to find and delete e-mail by using the containing text field. So when I saw the e-mail was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] email Server being Block By AOL- Need suggestions on Getting this problem resolved with them

2005-08-18 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Howard, In your logs it should indicate a code you can check on at http://postmaster.info.aol.com/. Usually they are pretty tenatious on reverse dns entries. Also, you may want to look for any local clients that may be forwarding their mail from your server into AOL. Darrell

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS attacks

2005-08-18 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Nick- That would deny his internal users the ability to resolve external domains. I like the splitting ides - one for inside with recursion, one for outside without. -d - Original Message - From: Nick Hayer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Search Companion 2003

2005-08-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
We follow the same procedure that Matt outlined for our workstation setup under Windows XP, i.e. not turning on Index Server but configuring the search in that manner and telling it to search all file types (files with unknown extensions). I just tested added .SMD as "text" file type in