I have seen it also, but infrequently. The msg will arrive with the
Declude headers in the body and the usual headers missing or
incomplete. I didn't trouble shoot it, but will do so with the next
one to compare notes. We're also running IM 8.21 and the latest
release of Declude.
Wednesday,
hi,
did you report this to support?
we have a similar problem (using imail 7.15 with declude 3.0.5.23) with *.fwd,
*.gse and manually moved *.smd files. support still doing some research on our
problem. but we have some kind of work around:
we call smtp32.exe -qr -x as a task every 60 minutes
In 7.X on the SMTP panel, you will have tries before returning to sender
and queue timer. What are the settings there?
John C
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guhl, Markus (LDS)
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:48 AM
To:
I like the tangent but does anyone have a response to my question???
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 9:40 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
FYI
I finally nailed down some proof that IPFILE does
check multiple hops.
222.140.230.131 is not in the IPFile
205.158.62.0/24 is in the IPFile.
Received: from 1031C128 [222.140.230.131] by
imail.Farmprogress.com (SMTPD-8.22) id A60D251940; Tue, 24 Jan 2006
23:01:01 -0600Return-Path:
You are correct...i missed the version referenced; I see john has posted the
correct variable to look for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guhl, Markus (LDS)
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 10:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
A google search yields:
SBC Prodigy refers to Prodigy Communications L.P., part of the SBC family
of Internet Companies.
If you are looking at spamdomains... the SBC family just isn't something
that works well with spamdomains. not enough spamdomain options.
- Original Message -
Apparently according to the HOPHIGH parameter as you initially posted
also.
Matt
Scott Fisher wrote:
FYI
I finally nailed down some proof
that IPFILE does check multiple hops.
222.140.230.131 is not in the IPFile
205.158.62.0/24 is in the IPFile.
Received:
Hi
Everyone,
A
couple of weeks ago I posted a message regarding our SMTP Gateway. Several users
responded and have been using the beta version with no major issues. I
appreciate the responses. We now have the Alligate SMTP Gateway available
for evaluation for anyone that is interested. We
Guhl, Markus (LDS) wrote:
hi randy,
since we use imail 7.15 we do not have somethimg like Queuemgr. the funny thing
is, that something like that never happend with declude 2.x. it started at the
very second we changed to 3.0.5.x.
my declude.cfg settings are
THREADS 13
CONCATENATELOGS ON
I can't believe what is apparently permissible on this list. Has no
one realized that this product is a commercial competitor to IMail or
SmarterMail, with no relevance to Declude? Don't try that mail is
stopped before Declude has to deal with it attempt at association. It
is what it
Sandy I thought the same and I'm sure many here too. But I preffered
ignoring this spam message and withut commenting with the hope to prevent an
unnecessary load to a list who's job is to provide support for declude
products and nothing else.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Has no
one realized that this product is a commercial competitor to IMail or
SmarterMail, with no relevance to Declude?
I missed the post. .I actually had to look in my deleted emails to find
the email to which you were referring.. Obviously you are right - I
Sandy, I agree with you.
That fact that I was going to be silent has to do with my perception of the
users on this list, as compared to other lists that I participate on that I
am well know to posts rants.
The fact of the matter is I was one of the ones heavily (to my knowledge)
involved in
Judging by the responses, I suppose that it is inappropriate, at least
without approaching Barry about promoting this product here. I don't
however believe that the intentions were to snipe customers away from
Declude, but instead to provide a value-added solution to those of us
that require
Plans for a gateway version of Declude are still alive.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
I don't however believe that the intentions were to snipe customers
away from Declude,
No? Not to get some people out of the Declude upgrade path, so they
could spend their limited budgets elsewhere? Not to upsell a gateway
solution that takes the heat off a Declude infrastructure?
The
I felt the same way too, Sandy. As one who has endured the ire of some on
this list for my occasional and somewhat commercial posts for iPlus Info
Browser, which by the way, is not a competitor in any way to either IMail or
Declude, I feel especially qualified to say, Wow! That's blatant
hi john,
we did not changed those settings when we changed from declude 2.x to 3.0.5.23
(queue timer is 20 and tries before returning to sender is also 20) but those
queueruns did not even start. also a *.fwd should be processed right away (at
least this was my expirience when will still used
19 matches
Mail list logo
