Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ? Name Voting Time

2006-02-15 Thread Don Brown
I second that one, but maybe e-mail instead of mail. Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 10:18:11 PM, Darin Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DC> I'd like to vote for a write-in DC> Declude Mail Security Suite DC> You can add a 4 in there if you want...as in DC> Declude Mail Security Suite 4.0 DC> Da

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ? Name Voting Time

2006-02-15 Thread Darin Cox
I'd like to vote for a write-in Declude Mail Security Suite You can add a 4 in there if you want...as in Declude Mail Security Suite 4.0 Darin. - Original Message - From: "Barry Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:39 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail

[Declude.JunkMail] Fw: [Declude.Virus] ? Name Voting Time

2006-02-15 Thread Imail Admin
First, I vote AGAINST anything with "4" in it. Why 4? You were calling it version 4, but that's a complete misnomer. Currently, it represents the same feature set as the so-called version 3, so there is no reason to call it version 4. In addition, there are three components in it (AVA, JM, HJ),

[Declude.JunkMail] IIS SMTP / IMAIL + Declude Same Box

2006-02-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I am playing around with running IIS Smtp on the same box as my Imail + Declude installation. I had some questions for folks that have already implemented this. 1.) I know that IMAIL 8.15HF2 binds to all IP addresses. I changed the smtp listen port to 26. I installed IIS have it running and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ? Name Voting Time

2006-02-15 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I vote for Declude Pro Suite V4 Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Barry Simpson > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 2:39 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ? Nam

[Declude.JunkMail] ? Name Voting Time

2006-02-15 Thread Barry Simpson
Here are the choices: Please send your votes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] no later than 5pm Eastern Time Friday 17th February. - Declude Quattro - DEC4 - Suite4 - R/4 (release four) - Declude Total - Declude Power Suite 4 - Declude Max4

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinion

2006-02-15 Thread Nick Hayer
X-Note: X-Note: This email was scanned for spam. [Details at http://spamstats.madriveraccess.com] X-Note: This email has been virus scanned by F-Prot,McAfee AV, and ClamAV. X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Country-Chain: X-Hello: X-Note: SMTP Send

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinion

2006-02-15 Thread Matt
I originally only blacklisted some of their IP space that was known to spam and gave the rest of their space a few extra points, but late in 2004 I decided to block everything from them: 69.42.64.0/19Webair Internet Development Inc/webair.com (Spam Host/House) [69.42.64.0 - 69.42.95.25

[Declude.JunkMail] Opinion

2006-02-15 Thread Kevin Bilbee
What is known about this ISP OrgName:Webair Internet Development Inc OrgID: WAIR Address:333 Jericho Tpke Address:Suite 200 City: Jericho StateProv: NY PostalCode: 11753 Country:US We are getting spam from them that is not on IP or URI black lists Kevin Bilbee Netw

[Declude.JunkMail] Doc for SM3-ver3 vs. ver4

2006-02-15 Thread Redbaran28
Is there documentation for “Processing Order” using Smartermail 3 with junkmail ver3 vs. ver4? I have been testing SM3 with ver3 and getting some unexplainable results.   It is in the doc’s for Imail but not SM.   This would really help.   Rick  

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How would I catch email like this?

2006-02-15 Thread mail-lists
Thanks Darrell, Close to 24 hours since I implemented this and haven't had a single message get through Declude+invURIBL! Cavell McDermott Network Administrator Cottonwood Financial 972.753.0822 Office 214.403.4918 Cell http://www.thecashstore.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Left over D*.SM$ files in proc\work

2006-02-15 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Thank Bill,   I will review what I have setup later and get back to you.   Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:52 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Susan Duncan
I’m pretty sure I don’t have the pro version.  Does that mean that I cannot use country filters?   Susan Duncan Web/Communications Officer / Agent des Communications/web Union of Taxation Employees / Syndicat des employées de l'Impôt Tel: 613-235-6704 ext 240 Fax: 613-234-7290 e-mail:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Left over D*.SM$ files in proc\work

2006-02-15 Thread Bill Green dfn Systems
Goran,   I was having the same issue. I seem to have resolved it accidently while working on an ?unrelated? connectivity issue. Since I was not focusing on the orphaned proc/work files as I made changes, I do not know which change resolved this issue. These are the changes I made:   In Queue

[Declude.JunkMail] E-mail size filter

2006-02-15 Thread Kelly Scotto
Title: E-mail size filter Can someone show an example or two on how to filter out e-mail over 12mb. My users Imail mailboxes will except mail over 10mb even though the limit is set at 10mb thus causing a blockage when the try to DL mail. This always results in a call to me. It seems to be the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Scott Fisher
all_list.dat should be in your declude folder. Mine is dated 10/29/2005.   If you have JunkMail pro, you can write the filters.   REMOTEIP 5 CONTAINS . is a trick that I learned from Matt that essentially is always true. The sender's ip address (REMOTEIP) should always have a period in it.  

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Scott Fisher
I do score this way. One of the reasons is I can track whwere the spam is coming from with the log results. I'll score 30 points on a hold of 200. Not too high.   I'll then run those that didn't fail the Filter-country through Matt's MP_Foreign Test ending those that triggered the initial co

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Guhl, Markus \(LDS\)
hi,   it was a "experimental" test (from the time scott was in charge). but it still works (up to 3.0.5.24bb). there is no documentation of this in the manuals but you can search in the archive (http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/).   best regards from germany mfgi.a.gez

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Susan Duncan
I was looking for this in the documentation and didn’t find it in the Junkmail documentation http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/JunkMail/JM_2.0.6.asp   I don’t see anything about country nor remoteip the way you are using it (it’s a variable as far as I can see).  I didn’t see anyth

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread John Carter
Of course, all of this is "your mileage will vary", but Scott's filter might be simpler (therefore better), but I have a country filter (which I got from Scott) which allows me to set the score by the country.   The Global.cfg is FILTER-COUNTRY filter  d:\Decludefilters\filter-country.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Markus Gufler
  Personaly I wouldn't block or assign weights for certain countries. (keep in mind that COUNTRY and COUNTRIES are not the same) But I've seen excellent results by assigning a relative low wheigt for all IP-blacklists and add additional wheight only if the message is not origininating from "

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Scott Fisher
Darn enter key. didn' get to finish my email.   Here are the special coutnry codes: ##  Special Codes## *1 Multi-Regional# *2 Europe# *3 North America# *4 Central/South America# *5 Pacific Rim# *A ARIN Unlisted (North America/South Africa)# *B Public Data Network# *E RIPE Unlisted (Europe, N

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Scott Fisher
The COUNTRY filter is used for searching the last country in the country chain. The COUNTRY filter requires the all_list.dat file. See the end of the document for a link to this file. COUNTRY was introduced in the 1.62.   The COUNTRIES filter is used for searching all countries in the coun

[Declude.JunkMail] adding weight based on x-country-chain

2006-02-15 Thread Susan Duncan
Is there a way to add a weight based on the country?  I do not want to block on country, but the chances of mail coming from somewhere other than Canada or the US is fairly remote, so a weight on country + anything would mean it’s got a high chance of being spam.   I couldn’t find anythin