[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

Title: Whitelist Auth Looks like all our users are failing the cmdspace test. From the manual it seems I can use the Whitelist Auth to bypass this test for our users only. Can somebody show an example if this, I am not sure how to set it up. Kelly Scotto Assistant

[Declude.JunkMail] image spam

fyi - I just found these 2 plugins for spamassassin http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin http://antispam.imp.ch/patches/patch-ocrtext That will ocr the gifs, etc. These should help SA be even more effective within Declude.. -Nick --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version control and announcements.

I sure feel this way - not only the releases that are not mentioned but also the bugs that are described that go unanswered. I would guess these are some of the reasons this list is so dead now. oh yea - I started w/ver 1.28 :) -Nick John Shacklett wrote: Hi. Following along with the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] image spam

You might also want to look at using the SARE rules at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm, particularly the SARE Stock rules (70_sare_stocks.cf). Also, a couple of Fred's rule sets at http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm (88_FVGT_rawbody.cf 99_FVGT_meta.cf) can be quite helpful,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version control and announcements.

I think one of the underlying issues is that Declude isn't following a common version numbering scheme. Essentially they are using Major-dot-Minor-dot-Interim numbering, but they are doing alphas and betas as interim numbers that are never actually 'released'. This give the impression that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] image spam

Thanks Bill. I have been using the SARE stock rules but the others I was unaware of - as well as the update script! -Nick Bill Landry wrote: You might also want to look at using the SARE rules at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm, particularly the SARE Stock rules (70_sare_stocks.cf).

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] image spam

For what it's worth, SARE has their own download script (I'm not familiar with the sa-update script Bill mentioned) called RulesDuJour which is a bash shell script: http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour And that page contains a howto link for us Windows users who are running CygWin:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] image spam

RulesDeJour is a script for pulling down the non-official SARE rules sets. The sa-update script is used to pull down official SA rule updates (updating the default rule sets that come with SA). Bill - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] image spam

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin http://antispam.imp.ch/patches/patch-ocrtext That will ocr the gifs, etc. These should help SA be even more effective within Declude.. In keeping with the increased CPU demands of such tests, the new version of SPAMC32 will contain the

[Declude.JunkMail] 4.2.3 and an increase in passing spam

I installed 4.2.3 last night, and have seen an increase in spam not being caught. Some, which are blatant in their wording, are even coming in below a weight of 5. I've check my cfg and $junkmail files and all are in order. Is this just a coincidence or are others experiencing this too? ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2.3 and an increase in passing spam

Have you checked the logs? John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:24 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2.3 and an increase in passing spam

Yes, and nothing out of the ordinary. It almost looks like 3/4 run through the full battery of tests, and the rest just skip right on through. They are mainly pharma spam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday,