I know the SENDERDB ones changed to MXRATE and you have to register (free)
to use the new lists.
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitorin
I'm using most of the ones you mention, and the ones I'm using all work. He's
what I have in my global.config that matches your list:
AHBLip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org * 7 0
DSBLip4rlist.dsbl.org * 8 0
MAILPOLICE-BULK rhsbl
I spent this afternoon cleaning up my global.cfg file and I still have some
tests listed that no longer show up in the latest config file from Declude.
I was wondering which of the following, if any are still active tests?
DSBL , SENDERDB-BLACK, SENDERDB-SUSPICIOUS, MAILPOLICE-BULK,
MAILPOLICE
Declude has indicated to me that the line will be removable for users not
running ZEROHOUR in a future version of Declude. It is currently hard coded to
be displayed in all email headers Declude processes SAME for ZEROHOUR[0] in
tests failed.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From:
For now you cannot get rid of the X-Declude-RefID line
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:54 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP rep
So you are implying that those of us who are not running Commtouch, if we
remove the ZEROHOUR statement from the global.cfg the X-Declude-RefID line in
the headers will go away?
(How to get rid of that line is a question that has been asked here before.)
Original Message
> F
Ensure you running the latest version of Declude 4.x and
that you have ZEROHOUR 14 in the global.cfg
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JeffSent: Wednesday,
November 01, 2006 12:47 PMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FP
Thanks Kevin...
Next question -- How can I have Declude add
the X-Declude-RefID: to the header ??
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Bilbee
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:16
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP
reporti
Hi David;
First, I'd like to thank you for your response, it is the first that I
have had and I really appreciate it.
I realize that the issue is the either accidentally or purposely
malformed messages. I would assume that there is a whole spectrum of
message rfc compliance out there, and e
I agree. That and the fact that RFCs are non-enforceable standards. There
are many cases of RFCs not being followed. We can't just decide which
non-RFC situations to handle and which not. We also cannot force all
non-standard mailers to adapt to our requirements. We must accept mail and
proces
Agreed Andy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:31 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line
Hi David:
Pardon me - but lets not f
Hi David:
Pardon me - but lets not forget that we choose to pay Declude license and
maintenance fees, precisely because of its claim of being superior in
detecting viruses, vulnerabilities and RFC violations that other components
are known to letting through.
When your business model is based on
Herb,
I need to clarify something here. This source of this problem is that these
messages do not conform to the RFC's and are extremely broken and should not
be accepted by the mail server in the first place. That is the source of the
problem, Declude is showing the symptom. Have you approached
S
I have declude setup to block by country using the blackholes dnsbl. It
appears that blackholes is having intermittent problems staying up thus
allowing spam to get through. Does anyone have a work around to block by IP
address by country? Seems like I read somewhere about setting up a private
dns
Hi Chris,
You might also check your Declude logs to make sure no DNS-based tests are
timing out. That extra wait can be a killer for message processing time.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Anton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:16 AM
Subject: Re
Thanks for the feedback! I will definatly make some updates to our config and
also run on debug level. I probably should update to the new Sniffer and run
both declude and message sniffer in persistent mode. -Chris
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe
When upgrading from Declude 2.x or prior you need to run the New install
rather than the upgrade. 2.x and prior is the single application version
whereas the new version is the decludeproc service.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
I was about to ask that myself. Also, the procedure for
reporting spam that is not caught...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff PereiraSent:
Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 AMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting
for ZE
Hi -Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting FP results that are failing the ZEROHOUR test ?jeff
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://
19 matches
Mail list logo
