If you are not an ISP get the commtouch ZEROHOUR addin. It will block most
of the GIF attachments. The only downside I have noticed is it will also
trap the chain emails that users love to send to each other.
We added it and I removed some of my less productive tests from declude.
Kevin Bilbee
>
A few days ago I posted an inquiry asking if there was a way to block
GIF attachments ... and several readers discouraged this since GIF
could be part of HTML email.
However, today noticed at least 10 to 15 spam messages that got
through all the tests, that basically were GIF attachments.
SmarterTools just announced a features list for the next release of
SmarterMail. They are releasing SmarterMail 4.x beta on Monday, November 13th.
(They estimate a final release of 4.x around January.)
The new features include greylisting and integration with SpamAssassin.
Check out the offic
Yea, but the last line should only be weight
WEIGH.SPAM.XHIGH weigh
x x 27 0
With this as your last weight all messages with a weight of
27 or higher will trigger this test.
Kevin Bilbee
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Unless, as some prefer, you want to mark the subject in addition to holding.
In that case, the old weight statements fit perfectly instead of the newer
weightrange.
Darin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, Novemb
This is how we have our server setup
SPAM-LOWweightrange x x 8 13
SPAM-MEDweightrange x x 14 24
SPAM-HIGH weight x x 25 0
SPAM-LOWSUBJECT [ SPAM %WEIGHT% ]
SPAM-MEDHOLD
SPAM-
Todd Richards wrote:
Thanks Kevin. This is what I was wondering about, so I will look into how
to implement.
something like this:
WEIGHTRANGE.SPAM.LOW weightrange x x 10 12
&& triggered on a weight of 10 to 12 inclusive
WEIGHTRANGE.SPAM.MID weightrange
Thanks John. I will look at fpReview. Yeah, browsing the mailbox is a bit
slow... :(
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:44 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Ju
Thanks Kevin. This is what I was wondering about, so I will look into how
to implement.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:58 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Ju
That's what I was wondering too, but then I wondered why it would make it to
the WEIGHT60 and get deleted?
I think what Kevin suggested with the weightranges would probably work.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent:
Is it because when it reaches WEIGHT19 and does the ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED],
the message is delivered? Then when it tries to perform the action of WEIGHT32
the message is already gone?
Does Declude allow for multiple instances of the same action where subsequent
actions are performed, or doe
Look at using "weightrange" instead of weight to define your weighted tests. It
simplifies the weighting and makes it clear on what will happen to the message.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Todd Richards
> Sent: Tues
What I do is send those grey ones to HOLD and then use fpReview to directly
view them and take appropriate action. Much faster and easier than using a
mailbox.
John T
eServices For You
"Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood."
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882)
> ---
Hey Everyone -
We are just getting things tuned to the point where we are truly happy with
the results we are seeing. What I am trying to do now is help myself
monitor the "close calls". I was sending everything between "caught" and
"delete" to a spam mailbox so that I could check for any false
14 matches
Mail list logo
