RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS

I know I'm not aware, care to expand? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Wind

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Comcast Mail Problem...

Declude/Imail Gurus, We have been seeing a problem, almost exclusively with comcast.net for about three months now. It's one of those intermittent problems that Mail Admins love. This may be a Imail problem, but I thought I'd check here first. Every so often (every couple days, weeks), at random

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter File - Maximum Size?

Thanks for the response. We are already using Sniffer; if a message triggers Sniffer we give the e-mail 60% of our delete weight. This works great, trust me... but I'm sick and tired of seeing w^^o_r-d#s l-!+k^e this in my hold queue.   The problem is, how many ways can you spell a word? How

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter File - Maximum Size?

We are currently debating putting a 300,000 line filter file into our production environment. This filter file would have many different variations of certain "bad" words, words we all see everyday in our spam hold files. This test would specifically be a BODY test.   Examples would be: B-L

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DLA Test Downloaded

Where can we get this program to try it out? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10.59 To: JunkMail Declude Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DLA Test Downloaded There have been many downloads today of my h

[Declude.JunkMail] default file filter?

tomer, who wants to BLOCK a list of e-mail addresses. Can I put a filter entry into their $default$.junkmail that does the opposite of "WHITELISTFILE"? Thanks __________ Aaron Moreau-Cook Acumen Associates, Inc. Network Architect --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ROUTETO & S/F

Thanks Scott, did the trick! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ROUTETO & S/F >We store & forward a client's e-mail for them, and t

[Declude.JunkMail] ROUTETO & S/F

l\spam) I will see a message with 31 points. Any ideas why? Thanks in advance! ______ Aaron Moreau-Cook Acumen Associates, Inc. Network Architect e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images

Rick, Would you mind posting a copy of this file? Thanks much! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images I have had good luck s

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Charter Communications CIDRs?

Dan, Another option for you would be to find out what their AS Numbers are and look through the BGP tables for IP Blocks that are being announced by those AS Numbers. AS Numbers: 22887 22521 22269 20115 19444 19115 16787 22291 19157 You can look up route announcments here (AS Report): http://ww

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] country filter

Help... I implemented this test and now I am getting these errors.. I am running 1.65. 02/10/2003 11:33:39 COUNTRIES CONTAINS0 YT 02/10/2003 11:33:39 Warning: misconfiguration in following line in global.cfg file (CONTAINS is not an ACTION) Thanks -Original Message- From

[Declude.JunkMail] Dealing with Nasty Spams

Declude List, First, let me apologize for the vulgarity of the e-mail I have attached below. Second, has anyone found a effective way to deal with this type of spam? This e-mail apparently was under our HOLD limit of 10, so it was forwarded onto our client (concealed for his protection). I could

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is a BASE64 attachment considered body?

Thanks Scott, my concern is text that is BASE64 encoded to "APPLE" being caught by the check. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declud

[Declude.JunkMail] Is a BASE64 attachment considered body?

All, Would this command below catch APPLE if it was in a BASE64 attachment? Are Attachments considered part of the body. BODY 15 CONTAINS APPLE Thanks --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Correct CONTAINS Syntax

Public thanks to everyone. My brain is feeling small today... so I had to ask what could be perceived as a dumb question! Thanks again, glad everyone here is so helpful! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Childers Sent: Wednesday, Jan

[Declude.JunkMail] Correct CONTAINS Syntax

I'm a bit confused. Which one is the correct syntax? SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER or SUBJECT 3 CONTAINS"You're a WINNER" Thanks, Aaron --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came fro

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Slow IMail IMAPd

Declude List, Sorry for the off topic post, but we are scratching our heads on this. We have migrated a customer of ours who is using IMAP, however performance is very poor compared to I-Mail 6.06. Other customers who use the same server report that POP and SMTP have increased in speed. The slow

[Declude.JunkMail] Spoofed IP's

This is a bit off topic, sorry! Let me start by proclaiming, I hate spam. It gives me headaches to no end, though Declude is preventing it from getting to our customers which makes them happy and makes me happy as well. We have a problem, where SpamCop or someone, will contact us claiming they ha

[Declude.JunkMail] Two Declude Tests?

We already assign weights to SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS, BASE64, etc etc However we would like to do something that may be a bit unique. If a message matches SNIFFER & SPAMHEADERS, we would like to just delete it. Can we combine tests and create a new action off of that? Thanks --- [This E-mai