[Declude.JunkMail] RE: Various Greeting Card messages

Has anyone found (or come up with) an effect filter for all of the greeting card messages floating around. I have been playing with them, but in doing so, I end up blocking legitimate cards. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Davud --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Valid Senders - Best Declude Practices

About a year ago, I wrote a C++ (no external dependencies) external-plus (whitelist/blacklist) add-in for Declude that supports the following: 1. Whitelist / Blacklist at company level. 2. Whitelist / Blacklist at user level (has support for aliases via redirection) 3. Whitelist /

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Where do I enter my serial number

Gary, The code gets placed in the Declude.cfg The format is: CODEX---- David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 1:20 PM To:

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: Availability of 5xxSink 0.5.00, IIS SMTP event sink for text-file recipient validation

You may want to take a look at Xwall by DataEnter (http://www.dataenter.co.at/products/xwall.htm) It supports user validation with a text file of via LDAP, greylisting, RBL / SBS/ SURBL, Bayes, SPF, CCS, Sender ID to name a few. We purchased the product for greylisting and it reduced our mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFPass - good or bad?

I use SPFFail to add weight to test to a message, but like you I have also seen spammers creating SPF records, which in turn allows them to get lower score with SPFPass. As a result, we no long find that SPFPass is a useful in detecting spam. David Kornitz / Cornerstone Computer Solutions,

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Application Errors

Is anyone else seeing an error like this in there system log? Event Type:InformationEvent Source:Application ErrorEvent Category:(100)Event ID:1004Date:2/2/2005Time:7:50:32 AMUser:N/AComputer:NS2Description:Reporting queued error: faulting application Declude.exe, version 0.0.0.0,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Application Errors

I have found a couple of them and have forwarded them to support. Thanks From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:19 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Application

[Declude.JunkMail] Log Levels

I working a routing to process the log files for declude. The ultimate goal is to produce statitics and graphs based on the information from the log files. I checked the manual and the descripiton for the various log formats is vague. WARN (This is in the current global.cfg, but I see no

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem with subject line in version 2.0

I ave the same problem and have reverted to the previous 2.0 version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:58 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem with subject line in version 2.0

, then that means the released version predates the beta version. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornitz, David Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 6:21 PM

[Declude.JunkMail] Off Topic: Contracts for spam/virus filtering

We are in the process of creating a contract for spam/virus filtering service that we offer to our customers. Does anyone have an example of such a contract that they would be willing to share? Thanks in advance. David --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

[Declude.JunkMail] 100 Point scale / DNS

First Question: I know this issue has been discussed in the past, but I would like to make sure I understand the discussions: 1. We are contemplating revising the scoring to a 100 point scale 2. I assume that when the conversion is made that initially you select the value for 100

[Declude.JunkMail] Virus Scanners Missing Viruses.

I have the following config for Virus Scanning: #McAfee Command Line SCANFILE1 Z:\IMail\NAI\SCAN.EXE /ALL /NOMEM /NOBEEP /NOBREAK /UNZIP /SILENT /NODDA /REPORT report.txt VIRUSCODE1 13 REPORT1 Found #CAI v7 SCANFILE2e:\Progra~1\CA\sHARED~1\ScanEn~1\inocmd32.exe -ARC -VER

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Error #183

would search the IMail SMTP log file for 435810aa00d01c07. If you find that two incoming E-mails both use the same spool file name, it's an IMail bug causing the problem. -Scott At 05:30 PM 3/31/2004, Kornitz, David wrote: Below is a log for a single email

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Logs / Whitelisting

1. I've been reviewing the log files and what is the meaning of the following log entries: 03/30/2004 00:08:28 Q0ecf080d00fe32c8 L2 Message OK 03/30/2004 18:30:27 Q111b18cd00a62426 L1 Message OK 2. How can you disable or adjust the score for disabling Bypassing whitelisting? Bypassing

[Declude.JunkMail] Error #183

Below is a log for a single email, the last line indicates that ther was an error # 183. I have checked and these files are still sitting in the spool directory, Virus scanning is excluding the following directories z:\IMAIL Z:\IMAIL\SPOOL Z:\IMAIL\SPOOL\VIRUS Any ideas as to other possible

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Error #183

. Matt Kornitz, David wrote: Below is a log for a single email, the last line indicates that ther was an error # 183. I have checked and these files are still sitting in the spool directory, Virus scanning is excluding the following directories z:\IMAIL Z:\IMAIL\SPOOL Z:\IMAIL\SPOOL\VIRUS Any

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammers bypassing gateways?

Matt, I've seen the same problem and the suggestion we have made to our customers is to reconfigure their firewall (or proxy server/smtp server), such that they only accept SMTP traffic from our mail servers. This does not stop spam initially, but over a period of time, the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User Whitelisting Options

Here's the problems I have run into setting up an External Plus Test: 1. Declude only uses tests the external plus test 1 time for each message. a. Using %ALLRECIPS% can cause problems when there is a larger number of recipients. Some of the parameters may not be passed

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User Whitelisting Options

KD I have written an external test that at the domain level allows KD the administrator decide whether the domain or user level KD has priority when whitelisting or blacklisting. What's your logic in that? The idea is the following: A specific company has certain organization that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

Kami, That's for the suggestion, but most of the mail I am filtering is for businesses accounts. These accounts do not have Mailboxes on the Imail server and therefore this option does not work. What we are in the process of doing is writing a front-end for declude using

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

Scott, Since each recipient can receive a different score how are the messages handled? 1) What happens when a messages is whitelisted for one individual and blacklisted for another? or you could also run into circumstances based on user preferences were one hit a hold value, one

[Declude.JunkMail] Legitimate AOL Messages being tagged as spam

I've been watching email go thru the system and all messages from AOL.COM are being tagged as spam. The following tests for each email are failed: BADSENDERS:5 NOABUSE:2 NOPOSTMASTER:1 nNON_ENGLISH:3 . Total weight = 11.Does anyone else have this problem? or have a suggestion as possible