[Declude.JunkMail] Processing order?

I'm sorry if this has been covered before, but I wasn't having any luck finding it in the list archives. I was wondering if declude junkmail processes mail first or if Imail's control access and killfiles do. Thanks Bart Lackorn STIC.NET --- [This E-mail was scanned for vir

[Declude.JunkMail] Somewhat OT: HiJack and mailing lists

I work for an ISP and we have a few users who like to send out weekly menu updates, inspirational messages, forwarded jokes, etc. Occasionally these users are getting caught by Hijack. Since the stuff they are usually sending is simply crap and not SPAM I'd like to figure out a way for them n

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message getting through

>>This particular user is still getting mail from the domains listed in >>PERMBLACKLIST txt file. The headers show that the mail is indeed failing >>the PERMBLACKLIST test, but for some reason the WEIGHT10 test is not being >>triggered. > >Is the WEIGHT10 test getting triggered when other com

[Declude.JunkMail] Message getting through

T X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: U X-UIDL: 326893399 This email is originally hitting his account at qsl.net which forwards to his account here at stic.net. Is that somehow creating a problem? I've doublechecked to see if his account is using a .junkmail file other than the default,

[Declude.JunkMail] console question (yet again)

ld help to explain the drastic drop in the percentage of mail that the console is listing as SPAM. Anyone have any ideas/theories? Thanks Bart Lackorn STIC.NET --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing

Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

>Note that there is no Date: or Message-ID: header (I removed the headers >that were added by Declude and IMail). The lack of a Date: header breaks >RFC-compliancy (and causes much of the E-mail to get lost). The missing >Message-ID: header is legal, but only allowed under certain circumstan

[Declude.JunkMail]

the Date: header is faulty (or send me a link that would explain it)? Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I'm kinda new to this. Thanks. Bart Lackorn STIC.NET --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkM

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Console question

I've been curious about how messages show up in the Declude Console as they stream through. In the top third of the console window messages are labeled as I, O, IS, OS, IV, or OV (I assume these standing for incoming/outgoing, SPAM, and Virus). Here's my question: If a message shows up as IS o

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

>But if each person has there own public IP address, I can not see how >that person would send say 80 or 100 legitimate e-mails internally >within say 1 hour. >If there are one or two or a few, it is better to just whitelist those >specific IP addresses. These are valid points too. However, th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

-- Original Message -- From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:36:11 -0700 >But wouldn't that defeat the purpose of protecting against some one in >the office sending out bulk junk e-mail, which is

[Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

x27;m trying to figure out a work-around without having to add an ALLOWIP line for every machine. For example, would ALLOWIP 2.2.2 allow anyone with a 2.2.2.xx IP address unlimited SMTP traffic? Thanks Bart Lackorn STIC.NET --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus