RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Dan Horne
FWIW, that second link is a story on WhatsUp Pro, not ICS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolf Tombe Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS A goggle

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Wolf Tombe
A goggle search on news related to Ipswitch shows they have gotten two of their press releases printed publicizing the brilliant move by Ipswitch in âGoing Proâ and âTaking on Exchangeâ. Iâm sure the MBAs are delighted with the self- congratulatory free marketing they are getting from these.

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Dan Rapaport
My wild guess is that the "brain trust" at Ipswitch decided they either needed to lower their prices or raise them. I don't blame them for deciding to switch to a higher pricing / less customers business plan. I do blame them for what appears to be a horrid transition. They do have some time t

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Sean Fahey
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS So we have been baited for seven years?? And now the ol' Ipswitch-a-roo??? I know there is a lot of anger, frustration

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread R. Lee Heath
inal Message- JC> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JC> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Lee Heath JC> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:37 AM JC> To: Sean Fahey JC> Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS JC> Funny but sadly true. JC> Definition: &quo

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread John Carter
Fahey Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS Funny but sadly true. Definition: "A sales tactic in which a bargain-priced item is used to attract customers who are then encouraged to purchase a more expensive similar item." This is a punishable legal offense. I do

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread R. Lee Heath
Funny but sadly true. Definition: "A sales tactic in which a bargain-priced item is used to attract customers who are then encouraged to purchase a more expensive similar item." This is a punishable legal offense. I do think there is very clearly a basis for action against Ipswitch here. I do

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Darin Cox
LOL! Darin. - Original Message - From: "Sean Fahey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:09 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS So, you're saying this is an example of "bait and I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Sean Fahey
So, you're saying this is an example of "bait and Ipswitch?" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswit

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Mark E. Smith
> I don't think any of us would be as upset if a year ago > Ipswitch published their intentions to kill off Imail which > would have allowed everyone to come up with migration plans > or upgrade. Exactly. In fact, I find Ipswitch's actions to be completely deceitful. Here is the email from the 8

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Rick Davidson
Great article! Ipswitch wouldnt be the first company destroyed by an MBA, they seem to be so enamoured with their MBA status that they overlook the reason the company was succesful in the first place... I bet the MBAs and Marketing people at Ipswitch ride to and from work in a short bus Rick D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Jim
The only reason to freak out is because Ipswich has pissed off their customer base by not giving people a heads up and slapping us in the fact Well I think a lot of us are concerned because we have invested a lot of money and time into Imail: 1. platform - Windows vs. free Linux alternative 2. ad

RE: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-27 Thread Mark E. Smith
All, We're missing one huge point and that is why purchase support agreements from Ipswitch. Let's review. 1. To get phone support. 2. To get major software updates. Everyone else keeps adding: 3. To get security hotfixes. However, #3 is incorrect: From Ipswitch.com Patches and Upgrades - Regis

Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Joshua Levitsky
Bud Durland wrote: There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement. People have right to be angry & disappointed over it; but traffic on he iMail list almost seems like a knee-jerk reaction: "Good lord that's a lot of money -- I'm buying something else right now". If GM dec

Re[5]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Alex
Jason, I've been using both Mailenable Pro and SmarterMail so I'll give my input and hope it helps. Personally I would love to see Declude in both products and it seems to be viable since both allow third party "hooks" (especially mailenable. sl> Just looking at the screen shot for the sl>

Re: CBL:RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread R. Lee Heath
G>   MG> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MG> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry MG> Simpson MG> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:02 PM MG> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MG> Subject: RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]Declude and Ipswitch ICS MG> Marcus, MG&g

Re[6]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 8:25:58 PM, Mailing wrote: ML> No question that the built in spam and av protection for smartertools is ML> no-where close to Declude. ML> Their antispam is made of blacklists (you can add your own as well) and ML> bayesian which I really like, but that's it. The end

Re: Re[4]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Mailing Lists
ginal Message - From: "sbsi lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:12 PM Subject: Re[4]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS Hey PV, Thanks for the feedback. My issue on changing - j

Re[5]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread R. Lee Heath
Thank you. That is excellent commentary and shows a reality centered focus on the issues at hand. -- Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rleeheath.com - Copy of Original Message(s): - sl> So... I saw this link on the Ipswitch forums and it's a good read - I sl> don't think it's been post

Re[4]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread sbsi lists
Hey PV, Thanks for the feedback. My issue on changing - just like everyone else here - is that Declude Junk/Virus is doing great for us and then moving to a new mail server and just "hoping" it will work as they (the new vendor) say it will ... I don't believe it. Just looking at the scree

Re: Re[2]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Mailing Lists
it will work in a high-volume environment. And I think ME also has an Imail migration util. PV - Original Message - From: "sbsi lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:28 PM Subject: Re[2]: CBL:RE

Re[2]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread sbsi lists
Hi PV, Interested in knowing how the SmarterTools Mail Server works for you -- as well as the MailEnable. I was in the process of testing the SmarterTools Stats program. The whole IPSWITCH is unbelievable in my opinion and I am in the process of installing a mail server in a new e

Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Mailing Lists
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:35 PM Subject: RE: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement. ... Yes I know that my server will not stop working a certain day only because the SA

Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Matt
ge- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bud Durland Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS Markus Gufler wrote: So you're recommendation for the moment is to k

RE: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Kevin Bilbee
IPSwitches part. Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bud Durland > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS > &g

RE: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Markus Gufler
> There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement. > ... Yes I know that my server will not stop working a certain day only because the SA expires. But what if there will happen something like a new MS Update that I must implement but will kill imail functionality. You know t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Matt
Barry Simpson wrote: Our immediate goal is to produce a ‘gateway’ version of Declude that will be downloadable and work within the ‘Windows’ environment. Barry, that's the first time that someone from your company has even indicated an OS that you are working on, and this is informa

RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Kaj Søndergaard Laursen
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry SimpsonSent: 26. oktober 2004 20:02To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS Our immediate goal is to produce a ‘gateway’ version of Declude that

CBL:RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Markus Gufler
this are good news  :-)   thanks Markus     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry SimpsonSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:02 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS Marcus,   We

Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Bud Durland
Markus Gufler wrote: So you're recommendation for the moment is to keep on IMail until you're ready with something else? That's really the most common sense approach, isn't it? There's been an almost hysterical reaction to the ICS announcement. People have right to be angry & disappointed over

RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Barry Simpson
get something out the door that will in effect be MTA independent.   Regards   Barry   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 1:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Markus Gufler
Now the shit is steaming"   Markus       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry SimpsonSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:01 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS By now most of you will have see

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Barry Simpson
By now most of you will have seen the recent announcement by Ipswitch of their product repackaging. Like you, we are disappointed by their decision to effectively impose a price increase to their base product offerings and to burden existing and future customers who appreciate the advantage