Title: Message
Hi,
I'm trying to detect
mails weight = 15 that did NOT fail "Sniffer".
I
have:
Global.cfg:
SNIFFER
external nonzero "D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.exe
?"40SNIFFER-SNAKEexternal
052"D:\IMAIL\Sniffer\Win32\.exe
?"10SNIFFER-SCAMS external
Andy,
That's not how MINWEIGHT works. MINWEIGHT is used for a filter so that
it doesn't subtract any more than the value that you give it, generally
a negative number unless you get fancy and apply scoring tests first.
The only way to do this currently would be to create an external test
to
I'm trying to detect mails weight = 15 that did NOT fail Sniffer.
In NOTSNIFFEDfilter.txt
MINWEIGHT 15
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER
REMOTEIP 0 CONTAINS .
The problem here is that the MINWEIGHT option in a filter determines a
minimum weight at which filter processing will stop. This is a
-Original Message-From: Andy Schmidt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004
3:03 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Detect "Test NOT Failed"
Hi,
I'm trying to
detect mails weight = 15 that did NOT fail "Sniffer".
I
nt: Monday, May 31, 2004 06:18
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Detect "Test NOT
Failed"Andy,That's not how MINWEIGHT works.
MINWEIGHT is used for a filter so that it doesn't subtract any more than the
value that you give it, generally a negative number u
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 06:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect "Test NOT Failed"
Andy,
That's not how MINWEIGHT works. MINWEIGHT is used for a filter so that
it doesn't subtract any more than the value that you give it, generall
Of Colbeck, AndrewSent: Monday, May 31, 2004 06:32
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Detect "Test NOT Failed"
fgrep "Total weight = " dec0531.log |
fgrep -v "SNIFFER" | gawk "$NF =20"
result.txt
sample
contents of r
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed
M Andy,
M That's not how MINWEIGHT works. MINWEIGHT is used for a filter
M so thatit doesn't subtract any more than the value that you give
M it, generallya negative number unless you get fancy and apply
M
Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 09:15 PM
To: Matt
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed
I'm just curious
Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 09:15 PM
To: Matt
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Detect Test NOT Failed
I'm just
That's the way to do it
Nope - it was a failure. The WEIGHTRANGE doesn't get processed by Declude
until the end. So when the FITLER is running, the WEIGHTRANGE hasn't been
set yet - apparently.
So, Scott... We're back to needing SKIPIFWEIGHTLESS!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201
Andy,
I'm a big proponent of a skip if less than or more than setup, however
I would like to see this in the Global.cfg so that the filter files
don't even need to be opened and read if the proper weights have been
tripped, thus saving a bunch of processing. This could be done with
two
Of MattSent: Monday, May 31, 2004 11:08
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Detect "Test NOT
Failed"Andy,I'm a big proponent of a skip if less
than or more than setup, however I would like to see this in the Global.cfg so
that the filter files don't even need to
13 matches
Mail list logo
