-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 3:17 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP: I just got listed on ORDB
What he said is that relay for addresses and no relay are the only
two
options that protect
PROTECTED]'
JR Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP: I just got listed on ORDB
JR What he said is that relay for addresses and no relay are the only
JR two
JR options that protect your mail server from being an open relay--the
JR other
JR options do not. You can use the no relay option if you are using
Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP: I just got listed on ORDB
I have my IMail set to Relay for local hosts only
To make sure that you are not an open relay, you can either use IMail's
Relay for addresses
Message-
From: Bennie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP: I just got listed on ORDB
Scott,
Are you saying that relay for address is not a good idea.. We have
customer that has a static IP address
I have my IMail set to Relay for local hosts only
To make sure that you are not an open relay, you can either use IMail's
Relay for addresses (in which case you would enter a list of safe IP
addresses that your users may come from; anyone not coming from those safe
IPs would need to use SMTP
PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP: I just got listed on ORDB
I just got listed on ORDB !
please see
http://ordb.org/lookup/?host=216.54.53.68
How can this have happened?
I have my IMail set to Relay for local hosts only and I have passed open
relay tests before!
How can I resolve
thanks Scott
Yes, I have the Hijack in place and it is saying 2 got relayed ;)
I have now gone to the No relay option
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/02 10:23AM
I have my IMail set to Relay for local hosts only
To make sure that you are not an open relay, you can either use IMail's
Relay
I know this is slightly off-topic for here, but has anyone
had problems with entering subnet masks in the Relay for
addresses? When I enter individual IP addresses here, the server
works fine, requiring SMTP AUTH for anyone not connection from one of the
listed IP's. However when I enter our
[NOTE: Your mail server [65.204.98.70] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All
Internet hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing
reverse DNS entry will cause your mail to be treated as spam on some
servers, such as AOL.]
Speaking of the 2 got relayed and HiJack. What exactly
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP: I just got listed on ORDB
[NOTE: Your mail server [65.204.98.70] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All
Internet hosts are required
I know this is slightly off-topic for here, but has anyone had problems
with entering subnet masks in the Relay for addresses? When I enter
individual IP addresses here, the server works fine, requiring SMTP AUTH
for anyone not connection from one of the listed IP's. However when I
enter our
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP: I just got listed on ORDB
Along the lines of Hijack, I still occasionally get customers
complaining of mail disappearing when the send
I have the top 64 IP's of a class C, so I was using 216.13.3.192 for both.
If you use 216.13.3.192 as the IP, and 255.255.255.192 as the netmask, it
should work.
A netmask should (except in the most unusual cases, such as if one person
got odd IPs in a given range whereas someone else got
oops. Sorry, that's what I meant. 216.13.3.192 for the IP
and 255.255.255.192 for the netmask, just as you said. When doing so, it
acted as an open relay to any connection.
At 01:17 PM 3/28/2002, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I
have the top 64 IP's of a class C, so I was using 216.13.3.192 for
both.
If
oops. Sorry, that's what I meant. 216.13.3.192 for the IP and
255.255.255.192 for the netmask, just as you said. When doing so, it acted
as an open relay to any connection.
Ah, that's not good. Unless there was an oversight somewhere, that sounds
like a bug in IMail.
I'm running 6.06. Can anyone else running 6.06 confirm this
behavior?
At 01:46 PM 3/28/2002, R. Scott Perry wrote:
oops.
Sorry, that's what I meant. 216.13.3.192 for the IP and 255.255.255.192
for the netmask, just as you said. When doing so, it acted as an open
relay to any connection.
Ah,
I have a
6.06 installation, and I have a combination of differently-sized subnets in my
local address table, and I have never seen this happen. For example, my IMail
server itself sits in a 255.255.255.240 netmask.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
17 matches
Mail list logo
