With reference to the problem reported regarding the detection of
attachments in email, please be advised that we are looking into this issue
today.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail cam
iday, October 28, 2005 7:55 AM
Subject: FW: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the body on 3.05.10
David,
Just for follow-up.
As I posted earlier we reverted back to 2.6 from 3.6.11 and 99% of these
"headers in the body" messages are gone.
-Original Message-
From:
tober 25, 2005 4:54 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the body on
> 3.05.10
>
> David,
> Thanks for the explanation!
>
> However, I have yet to see a message with SMTP headers in the body if
> I remove Declude and s
We are preparing to test an algorithm to eliminate
the problem whereby headers were inserted into the body of a message or at the
end of the message. If you have any examples of emails like these, please send
them as attachments to support at declude.com. We would like to run as many as
pos
We are preparing to test an algorithm to eliminate
the problem whereby headers were inserted into the body of a message or at the
end of the message. If you have any examples of emails like these, please send
them as attachments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. We would like to run
as many as possible
Behalf Of David Barker
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:27 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the
> body on 3.05.10
>
> In every instance that we have observed so far the headers in
> the body are caused by broken
At 02:47 PM 10/25/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Something changed at the time the new architecture came out. Either folks
>started using a lot of new / broken clients, or Declude became more
>sensitive.
In my opinion a lot of broken clients started happening. Whereas I beta
tested the new version on my
, 2005 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the body on 3.05.10
Something changed at the time the new architecture came out. Either folks
started using a lot of new / broken clients, or Declude became more
sensitive.
I say that based upon observation. We NEVER noticed the
that said we are looking into providing a solution for this
problem.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 9:07 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] He
solution for this
problem.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 9:07 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the body on 3.05.10
This
so they never make it to users.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 6:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the body on 3.05.10
Ever since I went t
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 (on Friday) I've been receiving
hundreds of complaints of spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the
messages but it's moving the SMTP headers to the body of the
email. This results in user's Outlook rules not firing on the
subject
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 I've been receiving hundreds of complaints of
spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the messages but it's
moving the SMTP headers to the body of the email. This results in user's
Outlook rules not firing on the subject line keywor
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 (on Friday) I've been receiving hundreds of
complaints of spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the messages but it's
moving the SMTP headers to the body of the email. This results in user's
Outlook rules not firing on the subject
eavily
weighted spam, so they never make it to users.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 6:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the body on 3
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 (now on 3.05.11) I've been receiving hundreds
of complaints of spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the messages but it's
moving the SMTP headers to the body of the email. This results in user's
Outlook rules not firing on the su
Why would the following headers not fail the test for spamcop
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [217.34.209.231]
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: AHBL, NOABUSE [8]
Unfortunately, Spamcop no longer gives out the details that they used
to. If the E-mail was sent within the past 39 hours, it should have
Why would the following headers not fail the test for spamcop
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="2F8D2F.E89E_C9CBF._F.F3"
X-Priority: 1
X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: "Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [217.34.209.231]
X-Note: This E-
Bernie,
The DSN failure means that your server isn't set up to receive messages
sent from <> senders (null senders). There's a checkbox for this in
IMail's SMTP configuration menu. You also might want to go to
rfc-ignorant.org and see what you need to do in order to get out of
their list, bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
B> To: "Bennie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
B> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:49 PM
B> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers
>> Remove your OSRELAY test OSRELAY is DEAD and is blacklisting the
>> entire world so for your own sake stop using it
er 09, 2003 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers
> Remove your OSRELAY test OSRELAY is DEAD and is blacklisting the
> entire world so for your own sake stop using it.
>
> REVDNS you might have it REVDNS'ed but whomever provided you with the
> IPs have not delegated it to
Remove your OSRELAY test OSRELAY is DEAD and is blacklisting the
entire world so for your own sake stop using it.
REVDNS you might have it REVDNS'ed but whomever provided you with the
IPs have not delegated it to you yet.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=12.35.63.10&type=A
Details:
m
Hello guys,
i have this in my header of an email i sent to myself. I turned off declude
to test because my emails were not going out...
X-RBL-Warning: OSRELAY: Please stop using relays.osirusoft.com
X-RBL-Warning: DSN: Not supporting null originator (DSN)
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was s
:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] headers indicate both failed
> and not failed
>
>
>
> >Can anyone tell me what is happening with the following headers? It
> >indicates that tests failed yet at the end it says that test
> failed
Can anyone tell me what is happening with the following headers? It
indicates that tests failed yet at the end it says that test failed is NOINE
Received: from mail.escapees.com [207.70.132.66] by intown.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.00) id A46EE000D0; Fri, 30 May 2003 03:12:46 -0400
Received: from
Can anyone tell me what is happening with the following headers? It
indicates that tests failed yet at the end it says that test failed is NOINE
thanks
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by intown.net
(SMTP32) id A062012F3; Fri, 30 May 2003 03:12:59 -0400
Received: from mail.escapees.com [207.70.132.66
I am using the copyto function to route a copy of any message that fails
the sniffer test to my email box.
If the message is a false positive I then insert the false positive
message into another email and send it off to the folks at sniffer.
What we found today is that for some reason headers are
>It seems like that the HEADERS tag does not trigger on Recipients.
It checks the headers only -- which may or may not include the recipients,
depending on whether they were in the To:, Cc: or Bcc: (if in the Bcc:,
they won't be listed in the headers). Note that Declude JunkMail will scan
th
Title: Message
Hi;
It seems like that
the HEADERS tag does not trigger on Recipients. Or may be it does but in
this case it was not (somehow) detected.
The X-Note:
Recipient(s): shows two emails (materials & material) that are listed
in our filter file with scores of 10. This SPAM shou
I've noticed Outlook 2000 puts the HEADER information on the first line of
the email with no return. Example:
REVDNS Hello Paul,
When I go to my web based email I see:
REVDNS
Hello Paul,
I realize this is an Outlook 2000 issue, but is there a workaround?
Any recommendations for good IMAP mail c
>You gave me the same advice in on 9/6/2001 14:29, After that I downloaded
>1.25a from your site and installed it.
>
>The last mail with the broken headers I posted was received when 1.25a was
>already installed.
If you go to a command prompt and type "declude -diag", does it show 1.25a
there?
You gave me the same advice in on 9/6/2001 14:29, After that I downloaded
1.25a from your site and installed it.
The last mail with the broken headers I posted was received when 1.25a was
already installed.
Is the version on your site an interim version?
Regards,
Terrence Koeman
-Original
32 matches
Mail list logo
