RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
And back to my original question. > Is PIDDEBUG still available to use in 2.0.6.x? Yes, it appears to be still available. However, I have noticed something interesting. When a postmaster message is created or processed, including forwards done by Imail, the PID file does not get deleted when fi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> Also, John - DEBUG mode now lists PID's. While that is true (and something I know about) leaving the log in DEBUG mode for several days waiting for it to occur again is not acceptable. John T eServices For You --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-06 Thread R. Scott Perry
> I'm just curious when this bug will be fixed. It was reported months ago. > I've got three more months left on my support contract and don't think I'm > going to renew if it takes six months for the Declude dev team to fix one > bug. Sorry yall, but my confidence is waning. I think it might

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-05 Thread Don Brown
27;t end up in file #13 along with the new manual. MH> Mike H MH> TNWEB MH> -Original Message- MH> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MH> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff MH> (Lists) MH> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 13:50 MH> To: Declude.JunkMail@de

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-05 Thread Michael Hardrick
ay, August 05, 2005 13:50 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG Is PIDDEBUG still available to use in 2.0.6.x? I am seeing a problem where after a couple days I notice there are 15 Declude processes running but not doing anything. This is on the 0xc142 error. The

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
This is a known issue with 2.0.6 - I wrote up my findings at http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24625.html I know that Declude is working on this issue and should be corrected very soon. Also, John - DEBUG mode now lists PID's. Darrell -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-05 Thread Michael Hardrick
I had to go back to ver 1.89 to resolve this issue. --Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spaminator Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 14:14 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG Very distressingly, I&#x

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-05 Thread Spaminator
Very distressingly, I've had the same thing happen to me multiple times, but to a much more significant degree. Just yesterday, I received a client call regarding a lack of email coming in. I checked, and there were *83* Declude processes running, all of which seemed to be doing nothing. Ther

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-05 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John > Tolmachoff (Lists) > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 11:50 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG > > Is PIDDEBUG still available to use in 2.0.6.x? > > I am seeing a problem where after a couple d

[Declude.JunkMail] PIDDEBUG

2005-08-05 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Is PIDDEBUG still available to use in 2.0.6.x? I am seeing a problem where after a couple days I notice there are 15 Declude processes running but not doing anything. This is on the 0xc142 error. There are no Q or D files in limbo. I can not stop the processes, I must restart the server. (This