OTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:29 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist to a recipient
Corby,
If you have Declude Virus Pro, you can set up per-user configurations
which are explained in the manual (htt
ssage.
just an idea...
Markus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:29 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelist to a recipient
Corby,If you have Declude Virus Pro, you c
Title: Whitelist to a recipient
Corby,
If you have Declude Virus Pro, you can set up per-user configurations
which are explained in the manual
(http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp). You should also
take note that multiple recipient spams can still be deleted when they
are also re
Title: Whitelist to a recipient
We have a recipient on our system that doesn't want spam filtering. Simple enough, I added a WHITELIST TO in global.cfg file.
This appears to have the consequence of whitelisting spam that is also addressed to others. He gets his spam, but so does everyone
Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Calvert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 4:38 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist to a local user
> Hi all,
>
> I added WHI
I added WHITELIST TO in my Global.cfg but it seems to have backfired on me.
I have a couple of users that want all emails to come to them unfiltered. I
added them in the Global.cfg as mentioned.
However we just had a message that was bcc'd to several others and it got
through to all because one
Hi all,
I added WHITELIST TO in my Global.cfg but it seems to have backfired on me.
I have a couple of users that want all emails to come to them unfiltered. I
added them in the Global.cfg as mentioned.
However we just had a message that was bcc'd to several others and it got
through to all bec
If I use this option will it whitelist all incoming to a particular user or
is this for outgoing mail only?
It will whitelist all E-mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It will
work both with incoming E-mail (where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a local
E-mail address) as well as outgoing E-mail (where [E
If I use this option will it whitelist all incoming to a particular user or
is this for outgoing mail only?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [E
sweet!
that will work perfectly
thanks man!
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: "System Administrator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Declu
on 4/9/04 1:32 PM, Rick Davidson wrote:
> Is it possible to make it so that if a whitelisted TO address is included
> with many recipients that only that one particular address is whitelisted
> and not everyone in the To field?
>
> Whitelist To [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> recieve an email to [EMAIL PR
Is it possible to make it so that if a whitelisted TO address is included
with many recipients that only that one particular address is whitelisted
and not everyone in the To field?
Whitelist To [EMAIL PROTECTED]
recieve an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
> likely that in the future the WHITELIST TO will be able to use less
> resources, so I would recommend using that.
Thanks, will do.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, j
Does anyone know what would be less processor intensive for Declude;
whitelisting a TO address or setting custom actions for the TO address?
The end result for us is the same so it doesn't matter which one I do, I'd
just like to do the one that is less rescource intensive.
Currently, both use abou
Does anyone know what would be less processor intensive for Declude;
whitelisting a TO address or setting custom actions for the TO address?
The end result for us is the same so it doesn't matter which one I do, I'd
just like to do the one that is less rescource intensive.
Thanks
-David
---
[Th
> the spool are sent out (using "Send One" in the IMail Administrator),
IMail
> will still call Declude -- but in these cases, Declude sees that IMail is
> processing an E-mail that has already been processed (based on what IMail
> tells Declude), and Declude stops the scan there.
Thanks for the
> No, it will not -- Declude will automatically ignore any E-mail that has
> already been scanned.
Does it look at headers and not re-scan or is Declude called in the process
before Imail writes the Q file?
Neither, actually. :)
When an E-mail arrives, IMail places it in the spool directory,
> No, it will not -- Declude will automatically ignore any E-mail that has
> already been scanned.
Does it look at headers and not re-scan or is Declude called in the process
before Imail writes the Q file?
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)
I have a user that I need to deliver 1000 held spam messages to. The user
is on a "Store and Forward" domain.
If I just copy the Q/D's back into the spool folder will not Declude Pro
just stop them again?
No, it will not -- Declude will automatically ignore any E-mail that has
already been sc
They only get scanned once, so copy away.
So even with Pro, all I need to do is drop them back in the Spool folder and
they'll get automatically delivered? This worked with Standard but I
thought we ran into a problem when we tried this with Pro since it does
outbound filtering as well.
Thanks
an
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist TO
>
> I have a user that I need to deliver 1000 held spam messages to. The user
> is on a "Store and Forward" domain.
> If I just copy the Q/D's ba
I have a user that I need to deliver 1000 held spam messages to. The user
is on a "Store and Forward" domain.
If I just copy the Q/D's back into the spool folder will not Declude Pro
just stop them again?
I assume I need to temporarily add a Whitelist To. Do I do this in
global.cfg for this user
Title: Nachricht
Hi
I've a question about WHITELIST
TO entries. The Messages with the folloving headers gets blocked by
Declude. Received: from
lxtris.tris.meles.net [213.192.34.108] by mail.zcom.it (SMTPD32-6.06)
id AAF739A8009E; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:15:19 +0200Received: by
lxtris.tris.mel
> Have you checked to make sure there are no spaces or extra
> characters at
> the end of the "WHITELIST" line?
Checked. There are no spaces or extra characters.
I've also tried to set
WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with no result
I've also tried to s
> Are you using Declude JunkMail Pro? Declude JunkMail
> Standard does not
> have per-user settings. You could instead use "WHITELIST TODOMAIN
> @mail.riedmann.it".
Bingo! We use the standard version.
I thougt "per user settings" are settings like "per domain settings" in
special subdirectori
> Have you checked to make sure there are no spaces or extra
> characters at
> the end of the "WHITELIST" line?
Checked. There are no spaces or extra characters.
Are you using Declude JunkMail Pro? Declude JunkMail Standard does not
have per-user settings. You could instead use "WHITELIST T
26 matches
Mail list logo
