> likely that in the future the WHITELIST TO will be able to use less
> resources, so I would recommend using that.
Thanks, will do.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, j
Does anyone know what would be less processor intensive for Declude;
whitelisting a TO address or setting custom actions for the TO address?
The end result for us is the same so it doesn't matter which one I do, I'd
just like to do the one that is less rescource intensive.
Currently, both use abou
Does anyone know what would be less processor intensive for Declude;
whitelisting a TO address or setting custom actions for the TO address?
The end result for us is the same so it doesn't matter which one I do, I'd
just like to do the one that is less rescource intensive.
Thanks
-David
---
[Th
