Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Star
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Removing mails by the subject
Here is an example subject:
(±¤°í)¹éÀü¹é½ÂÁÖ°¡Â÷Æ
Is there a test I can create that goes by the subject. I get tons that say
He Hit Me that are porn etc.
Darryl Koster
~~
Status Technologies Inc. President/Owner
Let Us Help You Get The Status You Deserve!
http
Hi;
Only in the Pro version you can have custom filters.
SUBJECT 10 CONTAINS He hit Me
Hope this helps.
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darryl Koster
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
It absolutely does,
Now does that remove just He hit me or would that also remove help me
mom, he hit me
Darryl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
Never mind, I should listen to my own support sometimes...RTFM.
Reading now.
Darryl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Removing mails
Darryl,
Sunday, March 9, 2003 you wrote:
DK I get tons that say
DK He Hit Me that are porn etc.
I've seen a bunch of those recently but they've failed the following
tests on my system:
OSSOFT, SPAMCOP, WIREHUB-DNSBL, DORKZTL,
SBL, SORBS-HTTP, CN-KR,
NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER,
Of Smart Business
Lists
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Darryl Koster
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Removing mails by the subject
Darryl,
Sunday, March 9, 2003 you wrote:
DK I get tons that say
DK He Hit Me that are porn etc.
I've seen a bunch of those recently but they've failed
Hi Darryl
We catch this spam message with 276% of our hold value.
There are a lot of not content based tests that fail this message. This
should be enough to block it.
Our free tool SPAMCHK makes a lot of content based tests. I do not
reccomend to filter this spam by the subject line he hit me
For those filtering on subject lines: The latest subject line that still uses
the web host frien**REMOVE**d-gree**REMOVE**tings.com
you have a card from
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Good morning,
I have a couple of filter questions for the group today.
What do you do about multiple contiguous spaces in the subject line?
Do you just put the spaces in as if they were an actual text value? Do you
put the spaces in quotes, or would that not work because Declude is
literally
What do you do about multiple contiguous spaces in the subject line?
That is actually included as part of the SPAMHEADERS test.
Do you just put the spaces in as if they were an actual text value? Do
you put the spaces in quotes, or would that not work because Declude is
literally
Title: Message
Hi;
Does negative
weight work with Subject?
Is this
valid?
SUBJECT-20CONTAINSDelivery
failure
I have a feeling
this does not work since mail rejections keep coming to the
SPAM.
Regards,
Kami
I've noticed some spam messages getting through our system lately and some
of them have a definite pattern in the subject.
The subject will typically be something like -
my engine blewHNMTTWG
where there is a phrase and then at least 6 spaces and then some kind of
code. I can't
I've noticed some spam messages getting through our system lately and some
of them have a definite pattern in the subject.
The subject will typically be something like -
my engine blewHNMTTWG
where there is a phrase and then at least 6 spaces and then some kind of
code. I
on 10/7/02 2:45 PM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
The SPAMHEADERS test should detect this.
It did, but I can't weight SPAMHEADERS so that it automatically deletes
those types of messages because SPAMHEADERS would catch/delete a lot of
legitimate e-mail messages.
Since, SPAMHEADERS is already spotting
In 1.57 beta we can use:
WEIGHT15s ROUTETO Admin@%LOCALHOST%
Is using variables also allowed for other actions? E.g.
WEIGHT15SUBJECT [SPAM-%WEIEGHT%]
In reviewing the spam we were trying to see if we can get a quick glance
at the weight that the email had before digging
Is there a way with Declude I can configure to allow these automated
e-mail messages through using the Subject Line and the word Quote but
not change my weighting system? Thanks.
With the filtering in the latest beta release, this can be
accomplished. It would require using the weighting
Hi,
I'm guessing that there were 2 subject headers in there -- a good one
and
a bad one. Do you have the full headers for that E-mail by chance?
here is the header.
After looking at it I suspect that Declude is reporting the string of 9
SPACES behind the word gate
Received: from dsp1000
After looking at it I suspect that Declude is reporting the string of 9
SPACES behind the word gate
Yes, that would do it.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Hi Scott:
07/09/2002 01:10:24 Q703d0e3a00de9b15 Msg failed SPAMHEADERS (This E-mail
has headers consistent with spam [4000400e].).
07/09/2002 01:10:24 Q703d0e3a00de9b15 Subject: gate
According to http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php?code=4000400e the
problem is a bad subject header - what
07/09/2002 01:10:24 Q703d0e3a00de9b15 Msg failed SPAMHEADERS (This E-mail
has headers consistent with spam [4000400e].).
07/09/2002 01:10:24 Q703d0e3a00de9b15 Subject: gate
According to http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php?code=4000400e the
problem is a bad subject header - what is so bad
Hello...
Installed JunkMail on my corporate mailserver (150 employees), and so far,
I've set the SUBJECT text to [Spam]. My boss thinks it should be something
less definate. He suggests [Spam?] in order to give the impression that the
message *may* be spam.
I'm interested in what other
notify via e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/20/02 11:29AM
Hello...
Installed JunkMail on my corporate mailserver (150 employees), and so far,
I've set the SUBJECT text to [Spam]. My boss thinks it should be something
less definate. He suggests [Spam?] in order to give
On domains where the subject is modified, we add UCE~ to indicate Spam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J Porter
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice for SUBJECT text
I had
I've noticed that even Microsoft email is failing the REVDNS test. It's
probably because their server is behind a firewall.
No, that's not it. Even if their mailserver is behind a firewall (in which
case it likely has a private IP), Declude will see the public IP address,
which definitely
We use the subject [SPAM] to indicate that the server thought it was SPAM.
We found that this provokes more user thought than [SPAM??].
1- [SPAM] indicates that some process has actually concluded something about
the email and the user must act in order to correct the problem if it not
SPAM (ie
I'm using the ATTACH action for Weight10, 14, 20,
and 30. Subject = Probable Spam!
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From:
J Porter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice
for SUBJECT text
I had the same
Is there a way to include a space between the word I put in the Subject field and the
original subject field?
Can I put more than one word in the Subject field? Example:
WEIGHT10SUBJECT This message may be junkmail
Currently my configuration looks like this:
WEIGHT10SUBJECT
Is there a way to include a space between the word I put in the Subject
field and the
original subject field?
If you add a space at the end of the line, that should work. For example,
WEIGHT10 SUBJECT SPAM instead of just WEIGHT10 SUBJECT SPAM.
Can I put more than one word in the Subject
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.35 released
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:53:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
We have had junkmail running for a few months now, but am just really
beginning to start using it to its full potential. I have created a
per-user check for my email to check everything and it is set to SUBJECT.
When something is caught it appears it is just putting SPAM in the heading
de.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] X-RBL-Warning: domain: whatever.com
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 07:27:26 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] X-RBL-Warning: domain: whatever.com
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:31:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook
de.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 99% CPU NOT the case with v1.26-interimB
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:07:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:10:17 -0400 002601c147b1$91f87fd0$f4a81f41@taugher
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:14:59 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X
301 - 335 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
