ienstag, 6. Juni 2006 00:49An:
declude.junkmail@declude.comBetreff: Re: AW: AW: AW:
[Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
Markus,Maybe you could post log snippets from both IMail
and Declude??? In this case a Q file would also be golden.It
kind of sounds like a non-standard character is being sent a
. You will see it go through just as described
by everyone else on this list.
Original Message
> From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:43 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [Declude
eclude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: AW: AW: AW:
[Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
Markus,Maybe you could post log snippets from both IMail
and Declude??? In this case a Q file would also be golden.It
kind of sounds like a non-standard character is being sent and Declude may be
barfing on the
:07
An: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
After seeing this "" in the
smtp logfile it seems not logic to me that there must be something
wrong in the configuration.
The first line of the declude
logfiles says th
(hopefully!!!)
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von MattGesendet:
Montag, 5. Juni 2006 23:48An:
declude.junkmail@declude.comBetreff: Re: AW: AW:
[Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
Markus,How about some debug loggi
that
they are aware of a possible problem and that they are still alive.
(hopefully!!!)
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von MattGesendet:
Montag, 5. Juni 2006 23:48An:
declude.junkmail@declude.comBetreff: Re: AW: AW:
[Declude.JunkMail
L PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von MattGesendet:
Montag, 5. Juni 2006 23:48An:
declude.junkmail@declude.comBetreff: Re: AW: AW: [Declude.JunkMail]
No action taken
Markus,How about some debug logging? It should be
easy to pick out these messages.I fear that maybe something is
different on
Markus,
How about some debug logging? It should be easy to pick out these
messages.
I fear that maybe something is different on your system than some
others. John for instance indicated that adding the actions to his
Global.cfg seems to have fixed the issue, yet you are still seeing the
iss
ck such type of mailfrom adresses.
Markus
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von MattGesendet:
Montag, 5. Juni 2006 23:20An:
declude.junkmail@declude.comBetreff: Re: AW: AW: [Declude.JunkMail]
No action taken
Markus,So based on the null sender, Declud
I'm 100% sure that I have exactly the same two actions defined in both
global.cfg and $default$.junkmail. They are there for several months now and
this server is handling also several gatewayed domains. As I know gatewayed
messages are handled as outgoing.
Markus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Markus,
So based on the null sender, Declude is improperly assuming outgoing
instead of incoming...but you have actions defined in your Global.cfg
that also aren't being triggered?
Maybe the bug that is confusing the type of sender is also responsible
for bypassing the actions?
Matt
Marku
Sorry, I was offline
I have the following actions configured in both global.cfg
and $default$.junkmail
WEIGHT80 SUBJECT [SPAM: %WEIGHT%]
WEIGHT150 HOLD
And yes Matt you're right: There is definitively something
wrong when this message is threated as outgoing because comput.info is a lo
12 matches
Mail list logo
