Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote: No, scanning an unindexed text file with tens of thousands of addresses is NOT faster than indexed LDAP lookups. Our LDAP servers can handle millions of queries per hour. If you index the data, you're just reinventing the wheel. LDAP is a standard and powerf

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote: The other options that involve local text files would certainly work, but performance under load could not exceed that of indexed LDAP lookups. From what I saw, ORF is loaded into memory the first time that it is called, and while AD lookups may be efficient, it

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Matt
:    +1 201 934-9206 http://www.HM-Software.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 03:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Matt
Sandy, I'm aware of your work around for this and I might even attempt to use it at some point.  I'm not comfortable though with the idea of telling others that this is the way to go with integrating a third-party product seeing as how it is a kludge and potentially prone to other issues.  Ips

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
06 http://www.HM-Software.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 02:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing Sandy, I recall checking this

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Matt
CTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 02:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing Sandy, I recall checking this out once before when it was mentioned, probably by you. Somehow I figured that you would pro

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Matt
IL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing Sandy, I recall checking this out once before when it was mentioned, probably by you. Somehow I figured that you would probably be the one that would know :) I do see the piece about ActiveDirectory integration.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
6 http://www.HM-Software.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 02:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing Sandy, I recall checking this out once before wh

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Matt
Sandy, I recall checking this out once before when it was mentioned, probably by you. Somehow I figured that you would probably be the one that would know :) I do see the piece about ActiveDirectory integration. I'm not an AD expert by any means, and I'm wondering if it's plausible to create

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Junkmail] MS SMTP LDAP Routing

2004-02-09 Thread Sanford Whiteman
LDAP routing cannot be used for (and isn't designed for) that purpose. If you're looking to integrate MS SMTP with your userbase, the best bet is ORF from Vamsoft, which offers AD-integrated envelope rejection. --Sandy -- Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologis