Below is an overview of what I believe is most relevant to me (in reverse
chronological order), thank you for helping me clarify a troubling situation!:
>I believe the fact that some employers may misuse information to mistreat
>employees is countered by the fact that some employees abuse the t
The recurring theme I'm seeing in this thread is a concern of being
implicated in the misuse of the Declude (or similar) tools to punish someone
wrongly. That's a valid concern.
What's being left unsaid is a concern of previously established tools (such
as high speed internet access and Email) be
All,
As I read your replies, 1984 plays on Showtime (I kid you not!). The main character
just read a printed letter (prehistoric email) and promptly burned it in his desk side
incinerator.
Thank you for your thoughtful, candid, and emphatic responses. If I may wax
philosophic (and Socratic
Dan,
Wednesday, February 26, 2003 you wrote:
DP> I just found out that within a week of starting my my anti spam
DP> service (delivery choice 2), a company fired an employee for
DP> receiving tons of porn via email.
I suppose somehow they knew he subscribed to it. Otherwise
someone just
4:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics
>
> 1. We are providing the data as a necessary service - the decisions about
> how that data is applied are out of our hands. I would hope that they
would
> be used in an enlightened way, and in our
1. We are providing the data as a necessary service - the decisions about
how that data is applied are out of our hands. I would hope that they would
be used in an enlightened way, and in our shop we do that - however the
discretion and the definition of "enlightened" is up to the ultimate "owner"
